Towards an AI-powered Future that Works for Vocational Workers

The future of work is speculated to undergo profound change with increased automation. Predictable jobs are projected to face high susceptibility to technological developments. Many economies in Global South are built around outsourcing and manual labour, facing a risk of job insecurity. In this paper, we examine the perceptions and practices around automated futures of work among a population that is highly vulnerable to algorithms and robots entering rule-based and manual domains: vocational technicians. We present results from participatory action research with 38 vocational technician students of low socio-economic status in Bangalore, India. Our findings show that technicians were unfamiliar with the growth of automation, but upon learning about it, articulated an emic vision for a future of work in-line with their value systems. Participants felt excluded by current technological platforms for skilling and job-seeking. We present opportunities for technology industry and policy makers to build a future of work for vulnerable communities.

[1]  J. Pal.  Computers and the promise of development , 2008 .

[2]  Andrea Forte,et al.  Hustling online: understanding consolidated facebook use in an informal settlement in Nairobi , 2013, CHI.

[3]  Jill Palzkill Woelfer,et al.  U-District Job Co-op: constructing a future vision for homeless young people and employment , 2017, Inf. Technol. People.

[4]  Klaus F. Zimmermann,et al.  A Roadmap to Vocational Education and Training Systems Around the World , 2013, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[5]  A. Manning,et al.  Lousy and Lovely Jobs: The Rising Polarization of Work in Britain , 2007, The Review of Economics and Statistics.

[6]  Kentaro Toyama,et al.  The Unexpected Entry and Exodus of Women in Computing and HCI in India , 2018, CHI.

[7]  Michael A. Osborne,et al.  The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? , 2017 .

[8]  Redwan Alqasemi,et al.  Vocational Rehabilitation of Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder with Virtual Reality , 2017, ACM Trans. Access. Comput..

[9]  Joyojeet Pal,et al.  Computers and the Promise of Development: Aspiration, Neoliberalism and 'Technolity' in India's ICTD enterprise , 2008 .

[10]  L. Winner.  Upon Opening the Black Box and Finding It Empty: Social Constructivism and the Philosophy of Technology , 1993 .

[11]  P. Biernacki,et al.  Snowball Sampling: Problems and Techniques of Chain Referral Sampling , 1981 .

[12]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Standing Out from the Crowd: Emotional Labor, Body Labor, and Temporal Labor in Ridesharing , 2016, CSCW.

[13]  Mary Hallward-Driemeier,et al.  Trouble in the Making?: The Future of Manufacturing-Led Development , 2017 .

[14]  Neha Kumar,et al.  Facebook for self-empowerment? A study of Facebook adoption in urban India , 2014, New Media Soc..

[15]  Sorelle A. Friedler,et al.  Hiring by Algorithm: Predicting and Preventing Disparate Impact , 2016 .

[16]  JarrahiMohammad Hossein,et al.  The Gig Economy and Information Infrastructure , 2017 .

[17]  K. Lum,et al.  To predict and serve? , 2016 .

[18]  Aaron D. Shaw,et al.  Social desirability bias and self-reports of motivation: a study of amazon mechanical turk in the US and India , 2012, CHI.

[19]  Nithya Sambasivan,et al.  Imagined Connectivities: Synthesized Conceptions of Public Wi-Fi in Urban India , 2017, CHI.

[20]  A. Lahiri,et al.  Breaking the Caste Barrier: Intergenerational Mobility in India , 2013 .

[21]  Anupam Chander.  The Racist Algorithm , 2016 .

[22]  Tawanna Dillahunt,et al.  Navigating the Job Search as a Low-Resourced Job Seeker , 2018, CHI.

[23]  Timnit Gebru,et al.  Gender Shades: Intersectional Accuracy Disparities in Commercial Gender Classification , 2018, FAT.

[24]  Bill Tomlinson,et al.  Who are the crowdworkers?: shifting demographics in mechanical turk , 2010, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[25]  Aya Okada.  Skills Development for Youth in India : Challenges and Opportunities (SPECIAL ISSUE : Youth, Education, and Work) , 2012 .

[26]  Richard Mateosian,et al.  Future of work , 2018, The Future of the Economy.

[27]  Dirk Heylen,et al.  Storytelling as a Creative Activity in the Classroom , 2017, Creativity & Cognition.

[28]  Stephen Cave,et al.  Portrayals and perceptions of AI and why they matter , 2018 .

[29]  Ryan K. L. Ko,et al.  Jobs lost, jobs gained: What the future of work will mean for jobs, skills, and wages , 2017 .

[30]  Min Kyung Lee.  Algorithmic Mediation in Group Decisions: Fairness Perceptions of Algorithmically Mediated vs. Discussion-Based Social Division , 2017, CSCW.

[31]  Barry A. T. Brown,et al.  Designing for Labour: Uber and the On-Demand Mobile Workforce , 2016, CHI.

[32]  Paul D. Clough,et al.  Competent Men and Warm Women: Gender Stereotypes and Backlash in Image Search Results , 2017, CHI.

[33]  Kentaro Toyama,et al.  From needs to aspirations in information technology for development , 2018, Inf. Technol. Dev..

[34]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Fairness and Abstraction in Sociotechnical Systems , 2019, FAT.

[35]  Allan Dafoe,et al.  Artificial Intelligence: American Attitudes and Trends , 2019, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[36]  Naveena Karusala,et al.  Aspirations-based design , 2019, ICTD.

[37]  Joyojeet Pal,et al.  Assistive technology and the employment of people with vision impairments in India , 2012, ICTD.

[38]  Meredith Ringel Morris,et al.  Accessible Crowdwork?: Understanding the Value in and Challenge of Microtask Employment for People with Disabilities , 2015, CSCW.

[39]  David R. Thomas,et al.  A General Inductive Approach for Analyzing Qualitative Evaluation Data , 2006 .

[40]  Mridula.  Educational statistics at a glance , 1987 .

[41]  David Beer,et al.  Power through the algorithm? Participatory web cultures and the technological unconscious , 2009, New Media Soc..

[42]  Ifeoma Ajunwa,et al.  The Paradox of Automation as Anti-Bias Intervention , 2016 .

[43]  Allison Woodruff,et al.  A Qualitative Exploration of Perceptions of Algorithmic Fairness , 2018, CHI.

[44]  David García,et al.  Bias in Online Freelance Marketplaces: Evidence from TaskRabbit and Fiverr , 2017, CSCW.

[45]  S. Sarkar.  Aspirations and Contestations: ICT Training and Subjectivities Among Marginalized Youth , 2018 .

[46]  Nimmi Rangaswamy,et al.  Scaling Classroom IT Skill Tutoring: A Case Study from India , 2018, CHI.

[47]  Gary Marsden,et al.  Exploring Mobile-only Internet Use: Results of a Training Study in Urban South Africa , 2011 .

[48]  R. Unnikrishnan,et al.  Vocational education technology: rural India , 2010, A2CWiC '10.

[49]  Hamid R. Ekbia,et al.  Heteromation and its (dis)contents: The invisible division of labor between humans and machines , 2014, First Monday.

[50]  A. Adams,et al.  Skills development in Sub-Saharan Africa , 2004 .

[51]  Tawanna Dillahunt,et al.  Support for Social and Cultural Capital Development in Real-time Ridesharing Services , 2018, CHI.

[52]  Jason Lam,et al.  Designing Future Employment Applications for Underserved Job Seekers: A Speed Dating Study , 2018, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[53]  Karen Schrier.  Using augmented reality games to teach 21st century skills , 2006, SIGGRAPH '06.

[54]  Tawanna Dillahunt,et al.  Do Massive Open Online Course Platforms Support Employability? , 2016, CSCW.