Ecological stress and sex evolution in soil microfungi

The elucidation of the origin and maintenance of sex is a major unsolved problem in evolutionary biology. A number of hypotheses have been elaborated, but the scarcity of empirical data limits further progress. During recent years, the general inclination has changed towards pluralistic models of sex evolution, due partly to an increased diversity of studied organisms. Fungi are among the most promising organisms for testing sexual causation, as demonstrated in recent laboratory experiments. However, reconciling theory and evidence necessitates critical field observations. Here, we report new estimates of the distribution of morphologically sexual and asexual soil microfungi in nature, which indicate a remarkable trend towards increased sexuality with increasing climatic stress.

[1]  S. Otto,et al.  Evolution of sex: Resolving the paradox of sex and recombination , 2002, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[2]  W. Rice.  Evolution of sex: Experimental tests of the adaptive significance of sexual recombination , 2002, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[3]  E. Nevo,et al.  Inherited differences in crossing over and gene conversion frequencies between wild strains of Sordaria fimicola from "Evolution Canyon". , 2001, Genetics.

[4]  N. Barton,et al.  SELECTION FOR RECOMBINATION IN SMALL POPULATIONS , 2001, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[5]  E Nevo,et al.  Evolution of genome–phenome diversity under environmental stress , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  F. Rouxel,et al.  Detection and Isolation of Soil Fungi , 2000 .

[7]  S. Otto,et al.  The evolution of recombination in a heterogeneous environment. , 2000, Genetics.

[8]  A. Burt.  PERSPECTIVE: SEX, RECOMBINATION, AND THE EFFICACY OF SELECTION—WAS WEISMANN RIGHT? , 2000, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[9]  Birky.  An even broader perspective on sex and recombination , 1999 .

[10]  Read,et al.  A pluralist approach to sex and recombination , 1999 .

[11]  Jw Taylor,et al.  THE EVOLUTION OF ASEXUAL FUNGI: Reproduction, Speciation and Classification. , 1999, Annual review of phytopathology.

[12]  A. Korol.  Selection for Adaptive Traits as a Factor of Recombination Evolution: Evidence from Natural and Experimental Populations (A Review) , 1999 .

[13]  B. Charlesworth,et al.  Why sex and recombination? , 1998, Science.

[14]  D. Greig,et al.  The effect of sex on adaptation to high temperature in heterozygous and homozygous yeast , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[15]  M. Feldman,et al.  Migration versus mutation in the evolution of recombination under multilocus selection. , 1998, Genetical research.

[16]  E. Nevo,et al.  Inherited and environmentally induced differences in mutation frequencies between wild strains of Sordaria fimicola from "Evolution Canyon". , 1998, Genetics.

[17]  D. Geiser,et al.  Cryptic speciation and recombination in the aflatoxin-producing fungus Aspergillus flavus. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  N. Barton,et al.  The evolution of recombination: removing the limits to natural selection. , 1997, Genetics.

[19]  G. Bell,et al.  The advantage of sex in evolving yeast populations , 1997, Nature.

[20]  M. G. Kidwell,et al.  Transposable elements as sources of variation in animals and plants. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  J. Deacon.  Modern mycology. 3rd ed. , 1997 .

[22]  A. Burt,et al.  Molecular markers reveal cryptic sex in the human pathogen Coccidioides immitis. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  C. Wills,et al.  Significant competitive advantage conferred by meiosis and syngamy in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  A. Korol,et al.  Increased recombination frequencies resulting from directional selection for geotaxis in Drosophila , 1994, Heredity.

[25]  A. Kondrashov,et al.  Classification of hypotheses on the advantage of amphimixis. , 1993, The Journal of heredity.

[26]  Korol' Ab,et al.  Efficiency of feedback selection for recombination in Drosophila , 1990 .

[27]  A. Korol,et al.  [Efficiency of feedback selection for recombination in Drosophila]. , 1990, Genetika.

[28]  Eviatar Nevo,et al.  Genetic parallelism of protein polymorphism in nature: ecological test of the neutral theory of molecular evolution , 1988 .

[29]  J. Ellis,et al.  Microfungi on Land Plants. , 1986 .

[30]  J. Ellis,et al.  Microfungi on Land Plants: An Identification Handbook , 1985 .

[31]  R. Ben-Shlomo,et al.  The Evolutionary Significance of Genetic Diversity: Ecological, Demographic and Life History Correlates , 1984 .

[32]  G. Bell,et al.  A Big Book on Sex@@@The Masterpiece of Nature: The Evolution and Genetics of Sexuality. , 1983 .

[33]  S. Levin.  Lectu re Notes in Biomathematics , 1983 .

[34]  C. Rodell,et al.  Genetic recombination and directional selection for DDT resistance in Drosophila melanogaster , 1982, Nature.

[35]  J. Webster,et al.  Fungal Ecology , 1995, Springer Netherlands.

[36]  P. Feldman.  Evolution of sex , 1975, Nature.

[37]  D. Griffin,et al.  Ecology of Soil Fungi , 1973 .

[38]  K. F. Baker,et al.  Occurrence of Dormant Ascospores in Soil , 1963, Nature.

[39]  P. H. Gregory,et al.  Ecology of Soil Fungi , 1961, Nature.

[40]  W. Brown.  Reproduction in Fungi , 1958, Nature.

[41]  R. Wensley.  MICROBIOLOGICAL STUDIES OF THE ACTION OF SOME SELECTED SOIL FUMIGANTS , 1953 .

[42]  G. Eloff.  The Effect of Temperature on Crossing-Over , 1932 .

[43]  H. H. Plough.  The effect of temperature on crossingover in Drosophila , 1917 .