Interobserver variations in the delineation of target volumes and organs at risk and their impact on dose distribution in intensity-modulated radiation therapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE This study aimed to (a) assess the differences in the delineation of target volumes and organs-at-risk (OARs) by different physicians designing an intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) and (b) analyze the impact of these differences on the treatment plan optimization. MATERIALS AND METHODS The planning target volumes (PTVs) and OARs for radiotherapy were manually delineated from computed tomography images of a patient with NPC, and a standard delineation was determined using the STAPLE algorithm of ABAS software. IMRT was designed using one standard plan and 10 individual plans based on the same constraints and field conditions. The maximum/minimum ratio (MMR) of the PTV and OAR volumes and the coefficient of variation (CV) for the different groups were evaluated and compared to the volume of the standard contour. RESULTS Significant differences were seen in the PTVs of the nasopharynx (PTVnx), neck lymph node (PTVnd) and the OARs manually delineated by different physicians. Compared to the standard plan, the mean dose-related parameters of various OARs in different individual plans were not significantly different, while that of most organs in different individual plans were reduced. However, a significant difference in the dose at each organ was noted in different individual plans. CONCLUSION Significant differences were noted in the PTV and OAR delineations by different physicians in radiotherapy of NPC, and their dosimetric parameters were significantly different from the standard planned parameters. Therefore, multicenter trials should pay attention to the impact of these differences on the clinical evaluation.

[1]  J. Staffurth,et al.  Improving radiotherapy quality assurance in clinical trials: assessment of target volume delineation of the pre-accrual benchmark case. , 2013, The British journal of radiology.

[2]  Joshua D. Lawson,et al.  Evaluation of automatic atlas-based lymph node segmentation for head-and-neck cancer. , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[3]  William M. Wells,et al.  Simultaneous truth and performance level estimation (STAPLE): an algorithm for the validation of image segmentation , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[4]  Blake Hannaford,et al.  Evaluation of segmentation methods on head and neck CT: Auto‐segmentation challenge 2015 , 2017, Medical physics.

[5]  Chong Zhao,et al.  Local control, survival, and late toxicities of locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated by simultaneous modulated accelerated radiotherapy combined with cisplatin concurrent chemotherapy , 2011, Cancer.

[6]  Quynh-Thu Le,et al.  Delineation of the neck node levels for head and neck tumors: a 2013 update. DAHANCA, EORTC, HKNPCSG, NCIC CTG, NCRI, RTOG, TROG consensus guidelines. , 2014, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[7]  L. Holloway,et al.  Uncertainties in volume delineation in radiation oncology: A systematic review and recommendations for future studies. , 2016, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[8]  Maarten L P Dirkx,et al.  Does atlas-based autosegmentation of neck levels require subsequent manual contour editing to avoid risk of severe target underdosage? A dosimetric analysis. , 2011, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[9]  Karin Haustermans,et al.  Radiation Therapy Oncology Group consensus panel guidelines for the delineation of the clinical target volume in the postoperative treatment of pancreatic head cancer. , 2012, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[10]  Primoz Petric,et al.  Uncertainties in target volume delineation in radiotherapy – are they relevant and what can we do about them? , 2016, Radiology and oncology.

[11]  Mary Feng,et al.  Normal tissue anatomy for oropharyngeal cancer: contouring variability and its impact on optimization. , 2012, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[12]  W. Tomé,et al.  Variations in the contouring of organs at risk: test case from a patient with oropharyngeal cancer. , 2012, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  N. Yue,et al.  Advantage of PET/CT in Target Delineation of MRI-negative Cervical Lymph Nodes In Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Planning for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma , 2017, Journal of Cancer.

[14]  Li Tee Tan,et al.  Challenges for Quality Assurance of Target Volume Delineation in Clinical Trials , 2017, Front. Oncol..

[15]  Brian O'Sullivan,et al.  International guideline for the delineation of the clinical target volumes (CTV) for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. , 2017, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[16]  Shichuan Zhang,et al.  Tumor volume is an independent prognostic indicator of local control in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy , 2013, Radiation oncology.

[17]  C. Terhaard,et al.  GTV delineation in supraglottic laryngeal carcinoma: interobserver agreement of CT versus CT-MR delineation , 2015, Radiation oncology.

[18]  Karin Haustermans,et al.  International consensus guidelines on Clinical Target Volume delineation in rectal cancer. , 2016, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[19]  Pietro Mancosu,et al.  Dosimetric impact of inter-observer variability for 3D conformal radiotherapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy: the rectal tumor target definition case , 2013, Radiation oncology.

[20]  Rick Chappell,et al.  Primary tumor volume of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: prognostic significance for local control. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[21]  Mustafa Cengiz,et al.  The role of delineation education programs for improving interobserver variability in target volume delineation in gastric cancer. , 2017, The British journal of radiology.

[22]  M. Philippens,et al.  Inter-observer agreement in GTV delineation of bone metastases on CT and impact of MR imaging: A multicenter study. , 2017, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[23]  Issam El Naqa,et al.  Consensus guidelines for delineation of clinical target volume for intensity-modulated pelvic radiotherapy for the definitive treatment of cervix cancer. , 2011, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[24]  Simon K. Warfield,et al.  A Logarithmic Opinion Pool Based STAPLE Algorithm for the Fusion of Segmentations With Associated Reliability Weights , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[25]  John Staffurth,et al.  Consensus Guidelines and Contouring Atlas for Pelvic Node Delineation in Prostate and Pelvic Node Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy. , 2015, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[26]  F. Fang,et al.  Long‐term late toxicities and quality of life for survivors of nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with intensity‐modulated radiotherapy versus non–intensity‐modulated radiotherapy , 2016, Head & neck.

[27]  A. Schwahofer,et al.  Long term results of postoperative Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) in the treatment of Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC) located in the oropharynx or oral cavity , 2015, Radiation Oncology.

[28]  Mechthild Krause,et al.  ESTRO consensus guideline on target volume delineation for elective radiation therapy of early stage breast cancer. , 2015, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[29]  J. Quivey,et al.  Long-term disease-specific and cognitive quality of life after intensity-modulated radiation therapy: a cross-sectional survey of nasopharyngeal carcinoma survivors , 2016, Radiation Oncology.

[30]  A Noel,et al.  Evaluation of the Block Matching deformable registration algorithm in the field of head-and-neck adaptive radiotherapy. , 2014, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[31]  Ying Sun,et al.  Multi-subject atlas-based auto-segmentation reduces interobserver variation and improves dosimetric parameter consistency for organs at risk in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A multi-institution clinical study. , 2015, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[32]  P. Brown,et al.  Consensus guidelines for postoperative stereotactic body radiation therapy for spinal metastases: results of an international survey. , 2017, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.