Training wrist extensor function and detecting unwanted movement strategies in an EMG-controlled visuomotor task

Stroke patients often suffer from severe upper limb paresis. Rehabilitation treatment typically targets motor impairments as early as possible, however, muscular contractions, particularly in the wrist and fingers, are often too weak to produce overt movements, making the initial phase of rehabilitation training difficult. Here we propose a new training tool whereby electromyographic (EMG) activity is measured in the wrist extensors and serves as a proxy of voluntary corticomotor drive. We used the Myo armband to develop a proportional EMG controller which allowed volunteers to perform a simple visuomotor task by modulating wrist extensor activity. In this preliminary study six healthy participants practiced the task for one session (144 trials), which resulted in a significant reduction of the average trial time required to move and hold a cursor in different target zones (p < 0.001, ANOVA), indicating skill learning. Additionally, we implemented an EMG based classifier to distinguish between the desired movement strategy and unwanted alternatives. Validation of the classifier indicated that accuracy for detecting rest, wrist extension and unwanted strategies was 92.5 + 6.9% (M + SD) across all participants. When performing the motor task the classification algorithm flagged 4.3 + 3.5% of the trials as ‘unwanted strategies’, even in healthy subjects. We also report initial feedback from a survey submitted to two chronic stroke patients to inquire about feasibility and acceptance of the general setup by patients.

[1]  F. Nouri,et al.  The effectiveness of EMG biofeedback in the treatment of arm function after stroke. , 1989, International disability studies.

[2]  Reza Langari,et al.  A Performance Comparison of EMG Classification Methods for Hand and Finger Motion , 2014 .

[3]  Todd A. Kuiken,et al.  Dual Window Pattern Recognition Classifier for Improved Partial-Hand Prosthesis Control , 2016, Front. Neurosci..

[4]  Jonathon W. Sensinger,et al.  Does EMG control lead to distinct motor adaptation? , 2014, Front. Neurosci..

[5]  J. Krakauer,et al.  Human sensorimotor learning: adaptation, skill, and beyond , 2011, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[6]  Dario Farina,et al.  The Extraction of Neural Information from the Surface EMG for the Control of Upper-Limb Prostheses: Emerging Avenues and Challenges , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[7]  S L Wolf,et al.  Electromyographic biofeedback applications to the hemiplegic patient. Changes in upper extremity neuromuscular and functional status. , 1983, Physical therapy.

[8]  E M Badley,et al.  Handicap in stroke survivors. , 1999, Disability and rehabilitation.

[9]  Tanja Schultz,et al.  Recognizing Hand and Finger Gestures with IMU based Motion and EMG based Muscle Activity Sensing , 2015, BIOSIGNALS.

[10]  Stuart N. Baker,et al.  Changes in descending motor pathway connectivity after corticospinal tract lesion in macaque monkey , 2012, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[11]  P. Langhorne,et al.  Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review , 2009, The Lancet Neurology.

[12]  Kelvin E. Jones,et al.  Sources of signal-dependent noise during isometric force production. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  Ahmet Alkan,et al.  Identification of EMG signals using discriminant analysis and SVM classifier , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[14]  S. Khosrawi,et al.  Effect of Neurofeedback and Electromyographic-Biofeedback Therapy on Improving Hand Function in Stroke Patients , 2014, Topics in stroke rehabilitation.

[15]  Olaf Gefeller,et al.  Epidemiology of Ischemic Stroke Subtypes According to TOAST Criteria: Incidence, Recurrence, and Long-Term Survival in Ischemic Stroke Subtypes: A Population-Based Study , 2001, Stroke.

[16]  J. Moreland,et al.  Efficacy of electromyographic biofeedback compared with conventional physical therapy for upper-extremity function in patients following stroke: a research overview and meta-analysis. , 1994, Physical therapy.

[17]  Kongqiao Wang,et al.  A Framework for Hand Gesture Recognition Based on Accelerometer and EMG Sensors , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[18]  Jonathon W. Sensinger,et al.  EMG Versus Torque Control of Human–Machine Systems: Equalizing Control Signal Variability Does not Equalize Error or Uncertainty , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[19]  O. Stavdahl,et al.  Control of Upper Limb Prostheses: Terminology and Proportional Myoelectric Control—A Review , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[20]  E. V. Wegen,et al.  EPOS Study Upper-Limb Function in Hospital Stroke Units : The Accuracy of Physical Therapists ' Early Predictions of , 2013 .

[21]  J. Krakauer,et al.  The interaction between training and plasticity in the poststroke brain. , 2013, Current opinion in neurology.

[22]  S. Micera,et al.  EMG-based pattern recognition approach in post stroke robot-aided rehabilitation: a feasibility study , 2013, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[23]  O. Armagan,et al.  Electromyographic Biofeedback in the Treatment of the Hemiplegic Hand: A Placebo-Controlled Study , 2003, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[24]  Robert Teasell,et al.  Rehabilitation of Individuals With Severe Stroke: Synthesis of Best Evidence and Challenges in Implementation , 2012, Topics in stroke rehabilitation.

[25]  V. Feigin,et al.  Worldwide stroke incidence and early case fatality reported in 56 population-based studies: a systematic review , 2009, The Lancet Neurology.

[26]  L. Cohen,et al.  Decoding upper limb residual muscle activity in severe chronic stroke , 2014, Annals of clinical and translational neurology.

[27]  Sang Wook Lee,et al.  Subject-Specific Myoelectric Pattern Classification of Functional Hand Movements for Stroke Survivors , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[28]  D. Nozaki,et al.  Adaptation to Visual Feedback Delay Influences Visuomotor Learning , 2012, PloS one.