Bi-level model for operational scheduling of a distribution company that supplies electric vehicle parking lots

Abstract Nowadays, the presence of renewable energy resources (RERs), electric vehicle (EV) penetration, and the implementation of demand response (DR) programs are the main affecting factors in the operational scheduling of a distribution company (DISCO). By the new market participants such as parking lot (PL) owners in the DISCO, a bi-level framework can be created for modeling the distribution network. Therefore, in this paper, a new bi-level model is suggested for DISCO’s operational scheduling that involves technical and environmental terms in the objective function. The maximization of the profit of the DISCO owner and the PL owner are the objective functions in each level. These purposes depend on the customers’ load, the power purchased from the upstream network, the power exchanged with the PL owner (for the upper-level) and the power exchanged with the DISCO owner, as well as the EV owners (for the lower-level). Linearization of the model is carried out by applying the Karush–Kuhn–Tucker (KKT) condition and Fortuny-Amat and McCarl linearization approach. Furthermore, EVs’ and RERs’ uncertainties, as well as DR programs are modeled. Also, three types of risk are described including risk-seeker, risk-neutral, and risk-averse (with conditional value-at-risk (CVaR) index). For evaluation of the proposed model, it is applied to the IEEE 15-bus test system. Results show that by charging/discharging schedule of EVs and critical peak pricing program, the DISCO owner gains more profit. Also, the sensitivity analysis allows determining that the EV penetration, nominal power of RERs and customer involvement in the DR program directly affect the DISCO owner’s profit.

[1]  Shuang Gao,et al.  Transient Stability Analysis of SMES for Smart Grid With Vehicle-to-Grid Operation , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[2]  M. Hadi Amini,et al.  A Decentralized Trading Algorithm for an Electricity Market with Generation Uncertainty , 2017, ArXiv.

[3]  Hongming Yang,et al.  Electric vehicle charging stations layout research based on bi-level programming , 2015, 2015 5th International Conference on Electric Utility Deregulation and Restructuring and Power Technologies (DRPT).

[4]  Mahmoud-Reza Haghifam,et al.  Risk-based reconfiguration of active electric distribution networks , 2016 .

[5]  P Frías,et al.  Assessment of the Impact of Plug-in Electric Vehicles on Distribution Networks , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[6]  E. F. El-Saadany,et al.  Uncoordinated charging impacts of electric vehicles on electric distribution grids: Normal and fast charging comparison , 2012, 2012 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting.

[7]  Chresten Træholt,et al.  EV Charging Facilities and Their Application in LV Feeders With Photovoltaics , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[8]  Yong Wang,et al.  Risk management and participation planning of electric vehicles in smart grids for demand response , 2016 .

[9]  Mohammad A. S. Masoum,et al.  Power quality of smart grids with Plug-in Electric Vehicles considering battery charging profile , 2010, 2010 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference Europe (ISGT Europe).

[10]  M. P. Moghaddam,et al.  Demand response modeling considering Interruptible/Curtailable loads and capacity market programs , 2010 .

[11]  M. Hadi Amini,et al.  Simultaneous allocation of electric vehicles’ parking lots and distributed renewable resources in smart power distribution networks , 2017 .

[12]  S. Martin,et al.  Demand-side management in smart grid operation considering electric vehicles load shifting and vehicle-to-grid support , 2015 .

[13]  Abdullah Abusorrah,et al.  A game theoretic approach to risk-based optimal bidding strategies for electric vehicle aggregators in electricity markets with variable wind energy resources , 2016 .

[14]  Zhipeng Liu,et al.  Optimal Siting and Sizing of Distributed Generators in Distribution Systems Considering Uncertainties , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[15]  Anastasios G. Bakirtzis,et al.  Optimal Offering Strategy of a Virtual Power Plant: A Stochastic Bi-Level Approach , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[16]  M. Parsa Moghaddam,et al.  Modeling and prioritizing demand response programs in power markets , 2010 .

[17]  Ilan Momber,et al.  Risk Averse Scheduling by a PEV Aggregator Under Uncertainty , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[18]  Vigna Kumaran Ramachandaramurthy,et al.  A review on the state-of-the-art technologies of electric vehicle, its impacts and prospects , 2015 .

[19]  Mahmoud-Reza Haghifam,et al.  Modelling hierarchical decision making framework for operation of active distribution grids , 2015 .

[20]  Silvano Martello,et al.  Decision Making under Uncertainty in Electricity Markets , 2015, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[21]  Mohammad A. S. Masoum,et al.  Voltage profile and THD distortion of residential network with high penetration of Plug-in Electrical Vehicles , 2010, 2010 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference Europe (ISGT Europe).

[22]  Mohamed A. El-Sharkawi,et al.  Optimal Scheduling of Vehicle-to-Grid Energy and Ancillary Services , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[23]  David B. Richardson,et al.  Electric vehicles and the electric grid: A review of modeling approaches, Impacts, and renewable energy integration , 2013 .

[24]  Mehdi Abapour,et al.  Optimal planning of plug-in hybrid electric vehicle charging station in distribution network considering demand response programs and uncertainties , 2016 .

[25]  Z. Tan,et al.  Application of CVaR risk aversion approach in the dynamical scheduling optimization model for virtual power plant connected with wind-photovoltaic-energy storage system with uncertainties and demand response , 2017 .

[26]  Zhiwei Xu,et al.  Risk-Averse Optimal Bidding Strategy for Demand-Side Resource Aggregators in Day-Ahead Electricity Markets Under Uncertainty , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[27]  G.R. Yousefi,et al.  Demand Response model considering EDRP and TOU programs , 2008, 2008 IEEE/PES Transmission and Distribution Conference and Exposition.

[28]  Marc A. Rosen,et al.  Intelligent optimization to integrate a plug-in hybrid electric vehicle smart parking lot with renewable energy resources and enhance grid characteristics , 2014 .

[29]  Ahad Kazemi,et al.  Risk-based planning of distribution substation considering technical and economic uncertainties , 2016 .

[30]  Joao P. S. Catalao,et al.  Risk-Based Bi-Level Model for Simultaneous Profit Maximization of a Smart Distribution Company and Electric Vehicle Parking Lot Owner , 2017 .

[31]  Shahram Jadid,et al.  Multi-objective scheduling of electric vehicles in smart distribution system , 2014 .

[32]  Zhenpo Wang,et al.  Grid Power Peak Shaving and Valley Filling Using Vehicle-to-Grid Systems , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[33]  Behnam Mohammadi-Ivatloo,et al.  Stochastic risk-constrained scheduling of smart energy hub in the presence of wind power and demand response , 2017 .

[34]  Jian Liu,et al.  Electric vehicle charging infrastructure assignment and power grid impacts assessment in Beijing , 2012 .

[35]  Li Zhang,et al.  Impacts of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles on a residential transformer using stochastic and empirical analysis , 2014 .

[36]  Zhao Yang Dong,et al.  CVaR-Constrained Optimal Bidding of Electric Vehicle Aggregators in Day-Ahead and Real-Time Markets , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[37]  Yonghua Song,et al.  Stochastic Bi-level Trading Model for an Active Distribution Company with DGs and Interruptible Loads , 2017 .

[38]  João P. S. Catalão,et al.  Optimal Behavior of Electric Vehicle Parking Lots as Demand Response Aggregation Agents , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[39]  Miadreza Shafie-Khah,et al.  A Decentralized Renewable Generation Management and Demand Response in Power Distribution Networks , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy.

[40]  Zhongfu Tan,et al.  A bi-level stochastic scheduling optimization model for a virtual power plant connected to a wind–photovoltaic–energy storage system considering the uncertainty and demand response , 2016 .

[41]  Miadreza Shafie-Khah,et al.  An Innovative Two-Level Model for Electric Vehicle Parking Lots in Distribution Systems With Renewable Energy , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[42]  Joao P. S. Catalao,et al.  Operational scheduling of a smart distribution system considering electric vehicles parking lot: A bi-level approach , 2019, International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems.

[43]  Pierluigi Siano,et al.  Risk-based planning of the distribution network structure considering uncertainties in demand and cost of energy , 2017 .

[44]  Ramteen Sioshansi,et al.  Plug-in hybrid electric vehicles can be clean and economical in dirty power systems , 2011 .

[45]  Mahmoud-Reza Haghifam,et al.  A Flexible Distribution System Expansion Planning Model: A Dynamic Bi-Level Approach , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[46]  Shahab Bahrami,et al.  Game Theoretic Based Charging Strategy for Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[47]  Ranjit Roy,et al.  Impact of wind uncertainty, plug-in-electric vehicles and demand response program on transmission network expansion planning , 2016 .

[48]  J. Driesen,et al.  The Impact of Charging Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles on a Residential Distribution Grid , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[49]  A. Jimenez,et al.  Voltage unbalance analysis of distribution systems using a three-phase power flow ans a Genetic Algorithm for PEV fleets scheduling , 2012, 2012 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting.

[50]  Leehter Yao,et al.  A Real-Time Charging Scheme for Demand Response in Electric Vehicle Parking Station , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[51]  Ganesh K. Venayagamoorthy,et al.  Wide area control for improving stability of a power system with plug-in electric vehicles , 2010 .