Fifth and Sixth Graders' Involvement and Participation in Cooperative Small Groups in Mathematics

This study examined 48 fifth- and sixth-grade students' responses in cooperative small groups in mathematics. Students' attending and participating behavior was observed in small-group and whole-class settings in 1 fifth-grade and 5 sixth-grade classes in 3 schools. Findings showed that students generally spent more time on-task, and especially more quality time on-task, in groups than in the whole-class setting. Students were also more active participants in groups. Boys showed more initiating behavior in cooperative small groups than did girls. Low achievers were more passive than high achievers in cooperative small groups.

[1]  A study of intermediate grade students' involvement and participation in cooperative small groups in Mathematics , 1992 .

[2]  N. Webb.  Student Interaction and Learning in Small Groups , 1982 .

[3]  N. Noddings.  Theoretical and Practical Concerns about Small Groups in Mathematics , 1989, The Elementary School Journal.

[4]  Ross Taylor.  The Potential of Small-Group Mathematics Instruction in Grades Four Through Six , 1989, The Elementary School Journal.

[5]  Michelle Perry,et al.  Problem Assignment and Learning Outcomes in Nine Fourth-Grade Mathematics Classes , 1988, The Elementary School Journal.

[6]  T. Good,et al.  Student Passivity: A Study of Question Asking in K-12 Classrooms. , 1987 .

[7]  Robert E. Slavin,et al.  Effects of Student Teams and Peer Tutoring on Academic Achievement and Time On-Task. , 1980 .

[8]  Robert E. Slavin,et al.  Student Teams and Achievement Divisions. , 1978 .

[9]  Andrew C. Porter,et al.  A Curriculum out of Balance , 1989 .

[10]  K. Williams,et al.  Many Hands Make Light the Work: The Causes and Consequences of Social Loafing , 1979 .

[11]  Neil Davidson.  Small-Group Learning and Teaching in Mathematics , 1985 .

[12]  James R. Flanders.  How Much of the Content in Mathematics Textbooks Is New , 1987 .

[13]  Suzanne Ziegler,et al.  The Effectiveness of Cooperative Learning Teams for Increasing Cross-ethnic Friendship: Additional Evidence , 1981 .

[14]  P. Peterson,et al.  Students’ Cognitions and Time on Task During Mathematics Instruction , 1984 .

[15]  E. Mandinach,et al.  The role of cognitive engagement in classroom learning and motivation , 1983 .

[16]  A. Bandura.  Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. , 1982 .

[17]  N. Webb.  Group composition, group interaction, and achievement in cooperative small groups. , 1982 .

[18]  Elizabeth G. Cohen,et al.  Can Classrooms Learn , 1989 .

[19]  A. Tesser,et al.  A self‐evaluation maintenance approach to school behavior , 1982 .

[20]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Effects of Cooperative and Individualistic Learning Experiences on Interethnic Interaction. , 1981 .

[21]  Ray R. Buss,et al.  Students' aptitudes and their reports of cognitive processes during direct instruction , 1981 .

[22]  Thomas L. Good,et al.  Looking in Classrooms , 1973 .

[23]  Penelope L. Peterson,et al.  Effective Teaching, Student Engagement in Classroom Activities, and Sex-Related Differences in Learning Mathematics , 1985 .