Microbial single-strand annealing proteins enable CRISPR gene-editing tools with improved knock-in efficiencies and reduced off-target effects

Abstract Several existing technologies enable short genomic alterations including generating indels and short nucleotide variants, however, engineering more significant genomic changes is more challenging due to reduced efficiency and precision. Here, we developed RecT Editor via Designer-Cas9-Initiated Targeting (REDIT), which leverages phage single-stranded DNA-annealing proteins (SSAP) RecT for mammalian genome engineering. Relative to Cas9-mediated homology-directed repair (HDR), REDIT yielded up to a 5-fold increase of efficiency to insert kilobase-scale exogenous sequences at defined genomic regions. We validated our REDIT approach using different formats and lengths of knock-in templates. We further demonstrated that REDIT tools using Cas9 nickase have efficient gene-editing activities and reduced off-target errors, measured using a combination of targeted sequencing, genome-wide indel, and insertion mapping assays. Our experiments inhibiting repair enzyme activities suggested that REDIT has the potential to overcome limitations of endogenous DNA repair steps. Finally, our REDIT method is applicable across cell types including human stem cells, and is generalizable to different Cas9 enzymes.

[1]  Paula M. Cannon,et al.  Rational Selection of CRISPR-Cas9 Guide RNAs for Homology-Directed Genome Editing. , 2020, Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy.

[2]  David R. Liu,et al.  Genome editing with CRISPR–Cas nucleases, base editors, transposases and prime editors , 2020, Nature Biotechnology.

[3]  Wei Yan,et al.  Efficient genome editing by CRISPR-Mb3Cas12a in mice , 2020, Journal of Cell Science.

[4]  F. Zhang,et al.  CRISPR-Based Therapeutic Genome Editing: Strategies and In Vivo Delivery by AAV Vectors , 2020, Cell.

[5]  Mo Li,et al.  Improving the efficiency of precise genome editing with site-specific Cas9-oligonucleotide conjugates , 2020, Science Advances.

[6]  Chun Jimmie Ye,et al.  Pooled Knockin Targeting for Genome Engineering of Cellular Immunotherapies , 2020, Cell.

[7]  W. Goessling,et al.  Synthetic CRISPR/Cas9 reagents facilitate genome editing and homology directed repair , 2020, Nucleic acids research.

[8]  Muhammad Nazeer Abbasi,et al.  Recombineering for Genetic Engineering of Natural Product Biosynthetic Pathways. , 2020, Trends in biotechnology.

[9]  Christopher J. Gregg,et al.  Improved bacterial recombineering by parallelized protein discovery , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  Charles D. Yeh,et al.  Advances in genome editing through control of DNA repair pathways , 2019, Nature Cell Biology.

[11]  N. Perrimon,et al.  An efficient CRISPR-based strategy to insert small and large fragments of DNA using short homology arms , 2019, bioRxiv.

[12]  D. Egli,et al.  Stimulation of CRISPR-mediated homology-directed repair by an engineered RAD18 variant , 2019, Nature Communications.

[13]  P. Andreassen,et al.  CRISPR-Cas9 fusion to dominant-negative 53BP1 enhances HDR and inhibits NHEJ specifically at Cas9 target sites , 2019, Nature Communications.

[14]  Daesik Kim,et al.  Evaluating and Enhancing Target Specificity of Gene-Editing Nucleases and Deaminases. , 2019, Annual review of biochemistry.

[15]  C. Gersbach,et al.  The next generation of CRISPR–Cas technologies and applications , 2019, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[16]  David R. Liu,et al.  Development of hRad51–Cas9 nickase fusions that mediate HDR without double-stranded breaks , 2019, Nature Communications.

[17]  K. Rajewsky,et al.  Enhancement of Precise Gene Editing by the Association of Cas9 With Homologous Recombination Factors , 2019, Front. Genet..

[18]  Matthew C. Canver,et al.  CRISPResso2 provides accurate and rapid genome editing sequence analysis , 2019, Nature Biotechnology.

[19]  F. Bushman,et al.  iGUIDE: an improved pipeline for analyzing CRISPR cleavage specificity , 2019, Genome Biology.

[20]  Silvio C. E. Tosatto,et al.  The Pfam protein families database in 2019 , 2018, Nucleic Acids Res..

[21]  Gregory McAllister,et al.  p53 inhibits CRISPR–Cas9 engineering in human pluripotent stem cells , 2018, Nature Medicine.

[22]  J. Rossant,et al.  Efficient generation of targeted large insertions by microinjection into two-cell-stage mouse embryos , 2018, Nature Biotechnology.

[23]  J. Taipale,et al.  CRISPR–Cas9 genome editing induces a p53-mediated DNA damage response , 2018, Nature Medicine.

[24]  Natasa Savic,et al.  Covalent linkage of the DNA repair template to the CRISPR-Cas9 nuclease enhances homology-directed repair , 2018, eLife.

[25]  J. Concordet,et al.  CtIP fusion to Cas9 enhances transgene integration by homology-dependent repair , 2018, Nature Communications.

[26]  Michel Sadelain,et al.  Gene therapy comes of age , 2018, Science.

[27]  Navnath S. Gavande,et al.  Modulating DNA Repair Pathways to Improve Precision Genome Engineering. , 2017, ACS chemical biology.

[28]  Krishanu Saha,et al.  Assembly of CRISPR ribonucleoproteins with biotinylated oligonucleotides via an RNA aptamer for precise gene editing , 2017, Nature Communications.

[29]  D. Durocher,et al.  Inhibition of 53BP1 favors homology-dependent DNA repair and increases CRISPR-Cas9 genome-editing efficiency , 2017, Nature Biotechnology.

[30]  Richard L. Frock,et al.  Ectopic expression of RAD52 and dn53BP1 improves homology-directed repair during CRISPR–Cas9 genome editing , 2017, Nature Biomedical Engineering.

[31]  Dominique Rasoloson,et al.  Precision genome editing using synthesis-dependent repair of Cas9-induced DNA breaks , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  Knut Stieger,et al.  Optimizing the DNA Donor Template for Homology-Directed Repair of Double-Strand Breaks , 2017, Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids.

[33]  Jing Xu,et al.  Efficient precise knockin with a double cut HDR donor after CRISPR/Cas9-mediated double-stranded DNA cleavage , 2017, Genome Biology.

[34]  S. Warming,et al.  Efficient mapping of transgene integration sites and local structural changes in Cre transgenic mice using targeted locus amplification , 2017, Nucleic acids research.

[35]  N. Costantino,et al.  Examining a DNA Replication Requirement for Bacteriophage λ Red- and Rac Prophage RecET-Promoted Recombination in Escherichia coli , 2016, mBio.

[36]  E. Stanley,et al.  A Cas9 Variant for Efficient Generation of Indel-Free Knockin or Gene-Corrected Human Pluripotent Stem Cells , 2016, Stem cell reports.

[37]  James E Haber,et al.  The democratization of gene editing: Insights from site-specific cleavage and double-strand break repair. , 2016, DNA repair.

[38]  J. Joung,et al.  Defining and improving the genome-wide specificities of CRISPR–Cas9 nucleases , 2016, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[39]  Jean-Paul Concordet,et al.  Improved Genome Editing Efficiency and Flexibility Using Modified Oligonucleotides with TALEN and CRISPR-Cas9 Nucleases. , 2016, Cell reports.

[40]  Lynda Chin,et al.  Post-translational Regulation of Cas9 during G1 Enhances Homology-Directed Repair. , 2016, Cell reports.

[41]  Y. E. Chen,et al.  RS-1 enhances CRISPR/Cas9- and TALEN-mediated knock-in efficiency , 2016, Nature Communications.

[42]  Jacob E Corn,et al.  Enhancing homology-directed genome editing by catalytically active and inactive CRISPR-Cas9 using asymmetric donor DNA , 2016, Nature Biotechnology.

[43]  Tetsushi Sakuma,et al.  MMEJ-assisted gene knock-in using TALENs and CRISPR-Cas9 with the PITCh systems , 2015, Nature Protocols.

[44]  D. Segal,et al.  How specific is CRISPR/Cas9 really? , 2015, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[45]  Wenyan Jiang,et al.  CRISPR-Cas: New Tools for Genetic Manipulations from Bacterial Immunity Systems. , 2015, Annual review of microbiology.

[46]  Graham Dellaire,et al.  Nuclear domain ‘knock-in’ screen for the evaluation and identification of small molecule enhancers of CRISPR-based genome editing , 2015, Nucleic acids research.

[47]  J. Pelletier,et al.  Pharmacological inhibition of DNA-PK stimulates Cas9-mediated genome editing , 2015, Genome Medicine.

[48]  Israel Steinfeld,et al.  Chemically modified guide RNAs enhance CRISPR-Cas genome editing in human primary cells , 2015, Nature Biotechnology.

[49]  Danwei Huangfu,et al.  A CRISPR/Cas-Mediated Selection-free Knockin Strategy in Human Embryonic Stem Cells , 2015, Stem cell reports.

[50]  James D. Winkler,et al.  Bacterial Recombineering: Genome Engineering via Phage-Based Homologous Recombination. , 2015, ACS synthetic biology.

[51]  Natalia N. Ivanova,et al.  Increasing the efficiency of homology-directed repair for CRISPR-Cas9-induced precise gene editing in mammalian cells , 2015, Nature Biotechnology.

[52]  David A. Scott,et al.  In vivo genome editing using Staphylococcus aureus Cas9 , 2015, Nature.

[53]  Tetsushi Sakuma,et al.  Precise in-frame integration of exogenous DNA mediated by CRISPR/Cas9 system in zebrafish , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[54]  Hidde L Ploegh,et al.  Inhibition of non-homologous end joining increases the efficiency of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated precise [TM: inserted] genome editing , 2015, Nature Biotechnology.

[55]  Steven Lin,et al.  Enhanced homology-directed human genome engineering by controlled timing of CRISPR/Cas9 delivery , 2014, eLife.

[56]  Martin J. Aryee,et al.  GUIDE-Seq enables genome-wide profiling of off-target cleavage by CRISPR-Cas nucleases , 2014, Nature Biotechnology.

[57]  J. Doudna,et al.  The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9 , 2014, Science.

[58]  Tetsushi Sakuma,et al.  Microhomology-mediated end-joining-dependent integration of donor DNA in cells and animals using TALENs and CRISPR/Cas9 , 2014, Nature Communications.

[59]  Ronald D. Vale,et al.  A Protein-Tagging System for Signal Amplification in Gene Expression and Fluorescence Imaging , 2014, Cell.

[60]  Dana Carroll,et al.  Genome engineering with targetable nucleases. , 2014, Annual review of biochemistry.

[61]  E. Lander,et al.  Development and Applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for Genome Engineering , 2014, Cell.

[62]  Gang Bao,et al.  CRISPR/Cas9 systems have off-target activity with insertions or deletions between target DNA and guide RNA sequences , 2014, Nucleic acids research.

[63]  H. Kim,et al.  A guide to genome engineering with programmable nucleases , 2014, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[64]  Jeffry D. Sander,et al.  CRISPR-Cas systems for editing, regulating and targeting genomes , 2014, Nature Biotechnology.

[65]  Jennifer A. Doudna,et al.  DNA interrogation by the CRISPR RNA-guided endonuclease Cas9 , 2014, Nature.

[66]  David A. Scott,et al.  Genome engineering using the CRISPR-Cas9 system , 2013, Nature Protocols.

[67]  David A. Scott,et al.  Double Nicking by RNA-Guided CRISPR Cas9 for Enhanced Genome Editing Specificity , 2013, Cell.

[68]  C. Barbas,et al.  ZFN, TALEN, and CRISPR/Cas-based methods for genome engineering. , 2013, Trends in biotechnology.

[69]  J. Keith Joung,et al.  High frequency off-target mutagenesis induced by CRISPR-Cas nucleases in human cells , 2013, Nature Biotechnology.

[70]  James E. DiCarlo,et al.  RNA-Guided Human Genome Engineering via Cas9 , 2013, Science.

[71]  Le Cong,et al.  Multiplex Genome Engineering Using CRISPR/Cas Systems , 2013, Science.

[72]  Harris H. Wang,et al.  Genome-scale engineering for systems and synthetic biology , 2013, Molecular systems biology.

[73]  A. De,et al.  An Inhibitor of Nonhomologous End-Joining Abrogates Double-Strand Break Repair and Impedes Cancer Progression , 2012, Cell.

[74]  Zhengwei Zhu,et al.  CD-HIT: accelerated for clustering the next-generation sequencing data , 2012, Bioinform..

[75]  J. Doudna,et al.  A Programmable Dual-RNA–Guided DNA Endonuclease in Adaptive Bacterial Immunity , 2012, Science.

[76]  Jeremy M. Stark,et al.  RI-1: a chemical inhibitor of RAD51 that disrupts homologous recombination in human cells , 2012, Nucleic acids research.

[77]  S. Diamond,et al.  Identification of specific inhibitors of human RAD51 recombinase using high-throughput screening. , 2011, ACS chemical biology.

[78]  G. Church,et al.  Lambda Red Recombineering in Escherichia coli Occurs Through a Fully Single-Stranded Intermediate , 2010, Genetics.

[79]  E. Rebar,et al.  Genome editing with engineered zinc finger nucleases , 2010, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[80]  Paramvir S. Dehal,et al.  FastTree 2 – Approximately Maximum-Likelihood Trees for Large Alignments , 2010, PloS one.

[81]  R. Guérois,et al.  Detection of novel recombinases in bacteriophage genomes unveils Rad52, Rad51 and Gp2.5 remote homologs , 2010, Nucleic acids research.

[82]  D. Carroll,et al.  Genetic Analysis of Zinc-Finger Nuclease-Induced Gene Targeting in Drosophila , 2009, Genetics.

[83]  J. Gall,et al.  Efficient gene targeting in Drosophila by direct embryo injection with zinc-finger nucleases , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[84]  Hanno Glimm,et al.  High-resolution insertion-site analysis by linear amplification–mediated PCR (LAM-PCR) , 2007, Nature Methods.

[85]  Dana Carroll,et al.  Induction and repair of zinc-finger nuclease-targeted double-strand breaks in Caenorhabditis elegans somatic cells , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[86]  Jeffrey C. Miller,et al.  Highly efficient endogenous human gene correction using designed zinc-finger nucleases , 2005, Nature.

[87]  Robert C. Edgar,et al.  MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. , 2004, Nucleic acids research.

[88]  E. Koonin,et al.  Classification and evolutionary history of the single-strand annealing proteins, RecT, Redβ, ERF and RAD52 , 2002, BMC Genomics.

[89]  R. Kolodner,et al.  DNA Strand Invasion Promoted by Escherichia coli RecT Protein* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[90]  Thomas L. Madden,et al.  Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. , 1997, Nucleic acids research.

[91]  C. Goolsby,et al.  Reducing cellular autofluorescence in flow cytometry: an in situ method. , 1997, Cytometry.

[92]  E. Kmiec,et al.  Beta protein of bacteriophage lambda promotes renaturation of DNA. , 1981, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[93]  D. Court,et al.  Genetic engineering using homologous recombination. , 2002, Annual review of genetics.

[94]  A. Stewart,et al.  RecE/RecT and Redalpha/Redbeta initiate double-stranded break repair by specifically interacting with their respective partners. , 2000, Genes & development.