Chemogenomics in drug discovery.

Chemogenomics is a new strategy in drug discovery which, in principle, searches for all molecules that are capable of interacting with any biological target. Because of the almost infinite number of drug-like organic molecules, this is an impossible task. Therefore chemogenomics has been defined as the investigation of classes of compounds (libraries) against families of functionally related proteins. In this definition, chemogenomics deals with the systematic analysis of chemical-biological interactions. Congeneric series of chemical analogs are probes to investigate their action on specific target classes, e.g., GPCRs, kinases, phosphodiesterases, ion channels, serine proteases, and others. Whereas such a strategy developed in pharmaceutical industry almost 20 years ago, it is now more systematically applied in the search for target- and subtype-specific ligands. The term "privileged structures" has been defined for scaffolds, such as the benzodiazepines, which very often produce biologically active analogs in a target family, in this case in the class of G-protein-coupled receptors. The SOSA approach is a strategy to modify the selectivity of biologically active compounds, generating new drug candidates from the side activities of therapeutically used drugs.

[1]  Hugo Kubinyi,et al.  Chemogenomics in Drug Discovery: A Medicinal Chemistry Perspective , 2004 .

[2]  R. Willette,et al.  Identification and in vivo efficacy of small-molecule antagonists of integrin αvβ3 (the vitronectin receptor) , 2000 .

[3]  G. Müller,et al.  Medicinal chemistry of target family-directed masterkeys. , 2003, Drug discovery today.

[4]  Gerhard Müller,et al.  Target Family‐Directed Masterkeys in Chemogenomics , 2005 .

[5]  A. Hopkins,et al.  Navigating chemical space for biology and medicine , 2004, Nature.

[6]  Peter G. Schultz,et al.  Synthetic small molecules that control stem cell fate , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  B. Shoichet,et al.  A specific mechanism of nonspecific inhibition. , 2003, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[8]  R. Hilgenfeld,et al.  Utility of homology models in the drug discovery process , 2004, Drug Discovery Today.

[9]  C. Wermuth Selective optimization of side activities: another way for drug discovery. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[10]  F. Bymaster,et al.  Antagonism by olanzapine of dopamine D1, serotonin2, muscarinic, histamine H1 and α 1-adrenergic receptors in vitro , 1999, Schizophrenia Research.

[11]  C. Wermuth,et al.  5-HT3 antagonists derived from aminopyridazine-type muscarinic M1 agonists. , 1998, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[12]  R G Smith,et al.  Rapid identification of subtype-selective agonists of the somatostatin receptor through combinatorial chemistry. , 1998, Science.

[13]  Peteris Prusis,et al.  Proteochemometrics: A Tool for Modeling the Molecular Interaction Space , 2005 .

[14]  H. Kubinyi,et al.  3D QSAR in drug design. , 2002 .

[15]  K. Bleicher,et al.  Chemogenomics: bridging a drug discovery gap. , 2002, Current medicinal chemistry.

[16]  Gerd Folkers,et al.  Ligand-protein interactions and molecular similarity , 1998 .

[17]  S. Schreiber PERSPECTIVE: THE SMALL-MOLECULE APPROACH TO BIOLOGYChemical genetics and diversity-oriented organic synthesis make possible the systematic exploration of biology , 2003 .

[18]  B. Stockwell Exploring biology with small organic molecules , 2004, Nature.

[19]  A. Hillisch,et al.  Protein structure-based design, synthesis strategy and in vitro pharmacological characterization of estrogen receptor alpha and beta selective compounds. , 2004, Ernst Schering Research Foundation workshop.

[20]  Koh Jt,et al.  A subtype-selective thyromimetic designed to bind a mutant thyroid hormone receptor implicated in resistance to thyroid hormone. , 2001 .

[21]  Hugo Kubinyi,et al.  Similarity and Dissimilarity: A Medicinal Chemist’s View , 2002 .

[22]  T. Scanlan,et al.  Selective thyromimetics: tissue-selective thyroid hormone analogs. , 2001, Current opinion in drug discovery & development.

[23]  R. Fletterick,et al.  Structure-based design and synthesis of a thyroid hormone receptor (TR) antagonist. , 2002, Endocrinology.

[24]  Brian K Shoichet,et al.  Kinase inhibitors: not just for kinases anymore. , 2003, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[25]  C. E. Peishoff,et al.  Discovery of Potent Nonpeptide Vitronectin Receptor (αVβ3) Antagonists , 1997 .

[26]  María L. López-Rodríguez,et al.  Comparative receptor mapping of serotoninergic 5-HT3 and 5-HT4 binding sites* , 1997, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[27]  S. Schreiber,et al.  Target-oriented and diversity-oriented organic synthesis in drug discovery. , 2000, Science.

[28]  B. Shoichet,et al.  Identification and prediction of promiscuous aggregating inhibitors among known drugs. , 2003, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[29]  B. Shoichet,et al.  A common mechanism underlying promiscuous inhibitors from virtual and high-throughput screening. , 2002, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[30]  Peter G. Schultz,et al.  A chemical switch for inhibitor-sensitive alleles of any protein kinase , 2000, Nature.

[31]  Edgar Jacoby,et al.  Chemogenomics knowledge-based strategies in drug discovery. , 2003, Drug news & perspectives.

[32]  Alex Matter,et al.  Glivec (STI571, imatinib), a rationally developed, targeted anticancer drug , 2002, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[33]  Philip Seeman,et al.  Radioreceptor Binding Profile of the Atypical Antipsychotic Olanzapine , 1996, Neuropsychopharmacology.

[34]  W. Michne,et al.  The Value of Chemical Genetics in Drug Discovery , 2005 .

[35]  Stuart L. Schreiber,et al.  Stereoselective Synthesis of over Two Million Compounds Having Structural Features Both Reminiscent of Natural Products and Compatible with Miniaturized Cell-Based Assays , 1998 .

[36]  C. Wermuth The Sosa approach: An alternative to high-throughput screening , 2001 .

[37]  T. Petcher,et al.  An opioid benzodiazepine , 1982, Nature.

[38]  W. Sneader Drug prototypes and their exploitation , 1996 .

[39]  C. E. Peishoff,et al.  Potent, selective, orally active 3-oxo-1,4-benzodiazepine GPIIb/IIIa integrin antagonists. , 1996, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[40]  H. Kubinyi Drug Discovery from Side Effects , 2005 .

[41]  Gisbert Schneider,et al.  Navigation in Chemical Space: Ligand‐Based Design of Focused Compound Libraries , 2005 .

[42]  S. Haggarty,et al.  Small molecule inhibitor of mitotic spindle bipolarity identified in a phenotype-based screen. , 1999, Science.

[43]  Hirosato Kondo,et al.  Design and synthesis of dual inhibitors for matrix metalloproteinase and cathepsin. , 2002, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters.

[44]  Alexander Hillisch,et al.  Dissecting Physiological Roles of Estrogen Receptor α and β with Potent Selective Ligands from Structure-Based Design , 2004 .

[45]  M. Murcko,et al.  Chemogenomic approaches to drug discovery. , 2001, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[46]  J. Robl,et al.  Dual metalloprotease inhibitors.v. Utilization of bicyclic azepinonethiazolidines and azepinonetetrahydrothiazines in constrained peptidomimetics of mercaptoacyl dipeptides , 1995 .

[47]  Arthur A. Patchett,et al.  Chapter 26. Privileged structures — An update , 2000 .

[48]  A. Maureen Rouhi MOVING BEYOND NATURAL PRODUCTS , 2003 .

[49]  B. E. Evans,et al.  Methods for drug discovery: development of potent, selective, orally effective cholecystokinin antagonists. , 1988, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[50]  T. Insel,et al.  NIH Molecular Libraries Initiative , 2004, Science.