Hierarchical modelling of tropical convective systems using explicit and parametrized approaches

Cloud systems observed during 1–7 September of GATE are examined in a hierarchical approach, namely: a two-dimensional cloud-resolving simulation using a 2 km grid length; two- and three-dimensional simulations using the Kain-Fritsch convective parametrization and 10, 15 and 25 km grid lengths; and coarse-grid simulations without any convective parametrization. All simulations are forced by the same objectively analysed time-varying large-scale advection of temperature and moisture. The domain-mean winds are relaxed to the observed wind profiles. Both the cloud-resolving modelling and the lower-resolution modelling with parametrized convection realize the three observed cloud system categories (squall line, non-squall cluster and scattered convection) and transitions among them. In particular, the well-organized fast-moving squall-type cloud system observed on 4 September is realized in a three-dimensional experiment with parametrized convection. In contrast, the lower-resolution modelling without any convective parametrization fails to produce the squall-type convective system during the weakly forced period but successfully represents the non-squall cluster during strong forcing. This lack of success is mostly attributed to convective triggering and the absence of resolved downdraught-enhanced surface fluxes. These issues are not as critical during strong large-scale forcing. The observed evolutions of temperature, water vapour mixing ratio, precipitation and surface moisture flux are realized in all simulations. A common deficiency is the overprediction of upper-level relative humidity. The simulation with parametrized convection features a comparatively large low-level water vapour mixing ratio, a surface and upper-level cold temperature bias and a mid-tropospheric warm bias. This is mainly attributed to deficiencies in how the Kain-Fritsch scheme represents convective mass flux, detrainment and entrainment by cumulus congestus.

[1]  M. Moncrieff,et al.  The dynamics and simulation of tropical cumulonimbus and squall lines , 1976 .

[2]  Da‐Lin Zhang,et al.  Numerical Simulation of the Meso-β Scale Structure and Evolution of the 1977 Johnstown Flood. Part II: Inertially Stable Warm-Core Vortex and the Mesoscale Convective Complex , 1987 .

[3]  W. Skamarock,et al.  The resolution dependence of explicitly modeled convective systems , 1997 .

[4]  W. Tao,et al.  GEWEX Cloud System Study (GCSS) Working Group 4: Precipitating Convective Cloud Systems , 1997 .

[5]  Piotr K. Smolarkiewicz,et al.  Two-Time-Level Semi-Lagrangian Modeling of Precipitating Clouds , 1996 .

[6]  Wojciech W. Grabowski,et al.  Cloud-Resolving Modeling of Tropical Cloud Systems during Phase III of GATE. Part I: Two-Dimensional Experiments. , 1996 .

[7]  J. Michael Fritsch,et al.  Numerical Simulation of the Meso-β Scale Structure and Evolution of the 1977 Johnstown Flood. Part I: Model Description and Verification , 1986 .

[8]  R. Houze,et al.  The Structure and Evolution of Convection in a Tropical Cloud Cluster , 1979 .

[9]  Len G. Margolin,et al.  On Forward-in-Time Differencing for Fluids: an Eulerian/Semi-Lagrangian Non-Hydrostatic Model for Stratified Flows , 1997 .

[10]  Akio Arakawa,et al.  Semiprognostic Tests of the Arakawa-Schubert Cumulus Parameterization Using Simulated Data , 1992 .

[11]  Wojciech W. Grabowski,et al.  A parameterization of cloud microphysics for long-term cloud-resolving modeling of tropical convection , 1999 .

[12]  David A. Randall,et al.  Explicit Simulation of Cumulus Ensembles with the GATE Phase III Data: Comparison with Observations , 1996 .

[13]  Da‐Lin Zhang,et al.  A comparison of explicit and implicit predictions of convective and stratiform precipitating weather systems with a meso‐β‐scale numerical model , 1988 .

[14]  D. Gregory,et al.  A numerical study of the parametrization of deep tropical convection , 1989 .

[15]  Isaac M. Held,et al.  Radiative-convective equilibrium with explicit two-dimensional moist convection , 1993 .

[16]  The Use of Cloud-Resolving Simulations of Mesoscale Convective Systems to Build a Mesoscale Parameterization Scheme , 1998 .

[17]  Kazuo Saito,et al.  Hydrostatic and Non-Hydrostatic Simulations of Moist Convection: Applicability of the Hydrostatic Ap , 1995 .

[18]  D. Gregory,et al.  Parametrization of momentum transport by convection. I: Theory and cloud modelling results , 1997 .

[19]  W. Tao,et al.  Response of Deep Tropical Cumulus Clouds to Mesoscale Processes , 1980 .

[20]  Robert A. Houze,et al.  Structure and Dynamics of a Tropical Squall–Line System , 1977 .

[21]  Shuyi S. Chen,et al.  Three-Dimensional Week-Long Simulations of TOGA COARE Convective Systems Using the MM5 Mesoscale Model , 1999 .

[22]  Wojciech W. Grabowski,et al.  Cloud-resolving modeling of cloud systems during Phase III of GATE. Part II: Effects of resolution and the third spatial dimension , 1998 .

[23]  Xiaoqing Wu,et al.  Long-Term Behavior of Cloud Systems in TOGA COARE and Their Interactions with Radiative and Surface Processes. Part I: Two-Dimensional Modeling Study , 1998 .

[24]  D. Stensrud,et al.  Mesoscale Convective Systems in Weakly Forced Large-Scale Environments. Part III: Numerical Simulations and Implications for Operational Forecasting , 1994 .

[25]  M. Lemone,et al.  Vertical velocity in oceanic convection off tropical Australia , 1994 .

[26]  David B. Parsons,et al.  Numerical Simulation of an Intense Squall Line during 10–11 June 1985 PRE-STORM. Part I: Model Verification , 1989 .

[27]  Mitchell W. Moncrieff,et al.  Organized convective systems in the tropical western pacific as a process in general circulation models: A toga coare case‐study , 1997 .