Are older adults networked individuals? Insights from East Yorkers’ network structure, relational autonomy, and digital media use

ABSTRACT Networked individualism is a critical concept about the transition of the societal shift from geographically bounded local groups to the contemporary network society comprised of sparse, permeable, and dynamic communication networks. An underlying assumption about networked individuals thus far in the literature is that they are at a younger age. There are fears that older adults have been left behind in this transition to networked individualism. In this study, we are the first to inquire to what extent ‒ and in what ways ‒ are older adults networked individuals. Using in-depth interviews with 41 older adults living in the East York area of Toronto, we used a combination of quantitative coding, thematic analysis, and individual profiling to analyze their social network structure, relational autonomy, and digital media use. Our findings render a rather complex and nuanced picture, showing three types of older adults along the spectrum of networked individualism: networked individuals, socially connected but not networked individuals, and socially constrained individuals. Although most participants are socially connected, those who are networked individuals actively manage and navigate multiple, diverse, and non-redundant social networks. Digital media use is neither necessary nor sufficient in qualifying a person as a networked individual as the great majority of East Yorkers ‒ even if not networked individuals ‒ integrate digital media into their everyday lives.

[1]  David Fishlock,et al.  Alone or Together , 1967 .

[2]  B. Wellman The Community Question: The Intimate Networks of East Yorkers , 1979, American Journal of Sociology.

[3]  B. Wellman,et al.  Networks, Neighborhoods, and Communities , 1979 .

[4]  B. Wellman,et al.  Different Strokes from Different Folks: Community Ties and Social Support , 1990, American Journal of Sociology.

[5]  Masao Nobe,et al.  The Community Question , 1991 .

[6]  Barry Wellman,et al.  Little Boxes, Glocalization, and Networked Individualism , 2001, Digital Cities.

[7]  B. Wellman Physical Place and Cyberplace: The Rise of Personalized Networking , 2001 .

[8]  Pramod K. Nayar,et al.  The Internet in everyday life , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[9]  S. Page Never say die , 2006 .

[10]  Tracy L. M. Kennedy,et al.  Connected Lives: The Project1 , 2006 .

[11]  B. Wellman,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Personal Relationships: Personal Relationships: On and Off the Internet , 2006 .

[12]  Barry Wellman,et al.  Strength of Internet Ties, The , 2006 .

[13]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[14]  Tracy L. M. Kennedy,et al.  The Networked Household , 2007 .

[15]  Never say die? , 2008, Clinical medicine.

[16]  Eszter Hargittai,et al.  Digital Inequality , 2008, Commun. Res..

[17]  Jeffrey Boase,et al.  PERSONAL NETWORKS AND THE PERSONAL COMMUNICATION SYSTEM , 2008 .

[18]  E. Cornwell,et al.  Social Disconnectedness, Perceived Isolation, and Health among Older Adults∗ , 2009, Journal of health and social behavior.

[19]  B. Wellman,et al.  Social Connectivity in America: Changes in Adult Friendship Network Size From 2002 to 2007 , 2010 .

[20]  Keith N. Hampton,et al.  How new media affords network diversity: Direct and mediated access to social capital through participation in local social settings , 2011, New Media Soc..

[21]  R. Centor,et al.  Different Strokes for Different Folks , 2012 .

[22]  B. Hanratty,et al.  Loneliness, isolation and the health of older adults: do we need a new research agenda? , 2012, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[23]  S. Cotten,et al.  Impact of Internet Use on Loneliness and Contact with Others Among Older Adults: Cross-Sectional Analysis , 2013, Journal of medical Internet research.

[24]  Rafael Wittek,et al.  Structural Holes , 2014, Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining.

[25]  Anabel Quan-Haase,et al.  Revisiting the digital divide in Canada: the impact of demographic factors on access to the internet, level of online activity, and social networking site usage , 2014 .

[26]  Laurel Tarulli,et al.  The Danger of a Single Story , 2014 .

[27]  Timothy B. Smith,et al.  Loneliness and Social Isolation as Risk Factors for Mortality , 2015, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[28]  Niall McCrae,et al.  Community question. , 2015, Nursing management.

[29]  Shreya Atrey,et al.  The Danger of a Single Story , 2016 .

[30]  J. Brill All the Lonely People , 2016 .

[31]  Keith N. Hampton Persistent and Pervasive Community , 2016 .

[32]  Ronald S. Burt,et al.  Social network and temporal discounting , 2017, Network Science.

[33]  E. Hargittai,et al.  Old Dogs, New Clicks: Digital Inequality in Skills and Uses among Older Adults , 2017 .

[34]  B. Wellman,et al.  Connected seniors: how older adults in East York exchange social support online and offline , 2017 .

[35]  Your smartphone is making you stupid, antisocial and unhealthy. So why can’t you put it down? - The Globe and Mail , 2018 .

[36]  B. Wellman,et al.  Weaving family connections on-and offline: the turn to networked individualism , 2018, Connecting Families?.