Block-sparse reconstruction and imaging for lamb wave structural health monitoring

A frequently investigated paradigm for monitoring the integrity of plate-like structures is a spatially-distributed array of piezoelectric transducers, with each array element capable of both transmitting and receiving ultrasonic guided waves. This configuration is relatively inexpensive and allows interrogation of defects from multiple directions over a relatively large area. Typically, full sets of pairwise transducer signals are acquired by exciting one transducer at a time in a round-robin fashion. Many algorithms that operate on such data use differential signals that are created by subtracting prerecorded baseline signals, leaving only signal differences introduced by scatterers. Analysis methods such as delay-and-sum imaging operate on these signals to detect and locate point-like defects, but such algorithms have limited performance and suffer when potential scatterers have high directionality or unknown phase-shifting behavior. Signal envelopes are commonly used to mitigate the effects of unknown phase shifts, but this further reduces performance. The block-sparse technique presented here uses a different principle to locate damage: each pixel is assumed to have a corresponding multidimensional linear scattering model, allowing any possible amplitude and phase shift for each transducer pair should a scatterer be present. By assuming that the differential signals are linear combinations of a sparse subset of these models, it is possible to split such signals into location-based components. Results are presented here for three experiments using aluminum and composite plates, each with a different type of scatterer. The scatterers in these images have smaller spot sizes than delay-and-sum imaging, and the images themselves have fewer artifacts. Although a propagation model is required, block-sparse imaging performs well even with a small number of transducers or without access to dispersion curves.

[1]  Yonina C. Eldar,et al.  Robust Recovery of Signals From a Structured Union of Subspaces , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[2]  Andrea Montanari,et al.  Message-passing algorithms for compressed sensing , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  S. Yuan,et al.  High spatial resolution imaging for structural health monitoring based on virtual time reversal , 2011 .

[4]  Paul D. Wilcox,et al.  Maximum-likelihood estimation of damage location in guided-wave structural health monitoring , 2011, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[5]  Michael A. Saunders,et al.  Atomic Decomposition by Basis Pursuit , 1998, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[6]  James S. Hall,et al.  Minimum variance ultrasonic imaging applied to an in situ sparse guided wave array , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[7]  Deanna Needell,et al.  CoSaMP: Iterative signal recovery from incomplete and inaccurate samples , 2008, ArXiv.

[8]  V. Giurgiutiu Tuned Lamb Wave Excitation and Detection with Piezoelectric Wafer Active Sensors for Structural Health Monitoring , 2005 .

[9]  David L Donoho,et al.  Compressed sensing , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[10]  E. Candès,et al.  Stable signal recovery from incomplete and inaccurate measurements , 2005, math/0503066.

[11]  Stéphane Mallat,et al.  Matching pursuits with time-frequency dictionaries , 1993, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[12]  Jochen Moll,et al.  Efficient temperature compensation strategies for guided wave structural health monitoring. , 2010, Ultrasonics.

[13]  Chun H. Wang,et al.  A synthetic time-reversal imaging method for structural health monitoring , 2004 .

[14]  Sang Jun Lee,et al.  Chirp excitation of ultrasonic guided waves. , 2013, Ultrasonics.

[15]  Philippe Micheau,et al.  Dispersion-based imaging for structural health monitoring using sparse and compact arrays , 2011 .

[16]  Jennifer E. Michaels,et al.  Block-sparse Lamb wave structural health monitoring using generic scattering models , 2014 .

[17]  Jennifer E. Michaels,et al.  Multi-path guided wave imaging for in situ monitoring of complex structures , 2013 .

[18]  Y. C. Pati,et al.  Orthogonal matching pursuit: recursive function approximation with applications to wavelet decomposition , 1993, Proceedings of 27th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers.

[19]  Ross M. Levine,et al.  Model-based imaging of damage with Lamb waves via sparse reconstruction. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  Yonina C. Eldar,et al.  Block-Sparse Signals: Uncertainty Relations and Efficient Recovery , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.