Finite element analysis of the effect of cantilever and implant length on stress distribution in an implant-supported fixed prosthesis.

This study investigated the stress distribution at the bone/implant interface with a three-dimensional finite element stress analysis by using three different cantilever and implant lengths in an implant-supported fixed partial denture. Simulation models were created as a bilateral distal cantilever fixed partial denture supported with six implants embedded in a model of the mandibular bone. Nine different simulation models had three different cantilevers (7, 14, and 28 mm) and implant lengths (7, 15, and 20 mm). Vertical forces of 75 N and horizontal forces of 25 N were applied to the distal end of the cantilever. Analysis of the von Mises stresses for the bone/implant interfaces revealed that the maximum stresses occurred at the most distal bone/ implant interface located on the loaded side and significantly increased with the length of the cantilever. However, there was no statistically significant change associated with the length of implants.

[1]  B Rangert,et al.  Forces and moments on Branemark implants. , 1989, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[2]  R Skalak,et al.  Biomechanical considerations in osseointegrated prostheses. , 1983, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[3]  H Weber,et al.  Biomechanical aspects of two different implant-prosthetic concepts for edentulous maxillae. , 1995, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[4]  Lily T. Garcia,et al.  Osseointegration and Occlusal Rehabilitation , 1989 .

[5]  D Siegele,et al.  Numerical investigations of the influence of implant shape on stress distribution in the jaw bone. , 1989, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[6]  A. Burstein,et al.  The elastic and ultimate properties of compact bone tissue. , 1975, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  A Harrison,et al.  Stress analysis techniques in complete dentures. , 1994, Journal of dentistry.

[8]  U. Lekholm,et al.  A new self-tapping Brånemark implant: clinical and radiographic evaluation. , 1992, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[9]  D Pipko,et al.  Three-dimensional finite element stress analysis in and around the Screw-Vent implant. , 1991, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[10]  M R Rieger,et al.  Finite element analysis of six endosseous implants. , 1990, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[11]  A A Caputo,et al.  Effect of cantilever length on stress transfer by implant-supported prostheses. , 1994, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[12]  G L Kinzel,et al.  A finite element survey of eleven endosseous implants. , 1990, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[13]  I Lewinstein,et al.  Finite element analysis of a new system (IL) for supporting an implant-retained cantilever prosthesis. , 1995, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[14]  T. Jemt Failures and complications in 391 consecutively inserted fixed prostheses supported by Brånemark implants in edentulous jaws: a study of treatment from the time of prosthesis placement to the first annual checkup. , 1992, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[15]  J. Kuiper,et al.  Stress distribution around dental implants: influence of superstructure, length of implants, and height of mandible. , 1992, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[16]  D Lundgren,et al.  Influence of number and distribution of occlusal cantilever contacts on closing and chewing forces in dentitions with implant-supported fixed prostheses occluding with complete dentures. , 1989, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[17]  P I Brånemark,et al.  A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. , 1981, International journal of oral surgery.

[18]  T Jemt,et al.  Early failures in 4,641 consecutively placed Brånemark dental implants: a study from stage 1 surgery to the connection of completed prostheses. , 1991, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[19]  L. Borchers,et al.  Three-dimensional Stress Distribution Around a Dental Implant at Different Stages of Interface Development , 1983, Journal of dental research.

[20]  C. de Putter,et al.  Stress-absorbing elements in dental implants. , 1990, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.