Conversations in conservation: revealing and dealing with language differences in environmental conflicts

1. Applied ecology aims to translate research into policy recommendations. However, conflicts frequently develop if these recommendations propose a contentious course of action. A first step towards addressing such conflicts is to attempt to understand the values underpinning stakeholder viewpoints. 2. We develop a computer-aided Content Analysis to analyse the language surrounding environmental conflicts for insights into stakeholder values. Using the conflict arising over proposals to cull hedgehogs Erinaceus europaeus on several Scottish islands, we show how different stakeholder groups frame the problem in different ways. 3. Stakeholder groups supporting different courses of action (culling vs. translocating hedgehogs) use different arguments, the former emphasizing conservation and biodiversity, the latter focusing on animal welfare. Our method results in a graphical representation of this failure to agree on a common way to frame the issue. 4. Including texts obtained from media sources illustrates how the media can exacerbate environmental conflicts through the issues they emphasize and the vocabulary they use. 5. Synthesis and applications. Our method provides a simple means to quantify levels of stakeholder disagreement concerning potentially contentious environmental issues. Our results provide a starting point for the development of a quantitative, graphical tool for managers, where repeated analysis will aid in monitoring and managing conflicts. In addition, we provide a clear example of the role of societal attitudes influencing the effective implementation of ecological advice, which should encourage ecologists to become more aware of the social environment into which policy recommendations are to be launched and to ensure that their advice does not ignore important stakeholder values.

[1]  D. Lach,et al.  Advocacy and Credibility of Ecological Scientists in Resource Decisionmaking: A Regional Study , 2003 .

[2]  D. Bengston,et al.  Conflict Over Natural Resource Management: A Social Indicator Based on Analysis of Online News Media Text , 1999 .

[3]  Stephen James Ormerod,et al.  The uptake of applied ecology , 2002 .

[4]  Jelte van Andel,et al.  Rethinking the interface between ecology and society. The case of the cockle controversy in the Dutch Wadden Sea , 2007 .

[5]  R. Green,et al.  The importance of the introduced hedgehog (Erinaceus europaeus) as a predator of the eggs of waders (Charadrii) on machair in South Uist, Scotland , 2000 .

[6]  Chris S. Elphick,et al.  Using a stochastic model to examine the ecological, economic and ethical consequences of population control in a charismatic invasive species: mute swans in North America , 2007 .

[7]  R. Clark,et al.  Roles of research scientists in natural resource decision-making , 2001 .

[8]  D. Bengston,et al.  Attitudes Toward Ecosystem Management in the United States, 1992-1998 , 2001 .

[9]  Tarla Rai Peterson,et al.  Cultural conflict and the endangered florida key deer , 2002 .

[10]  Mark W. Brunson,et al.  A Framework for Understanding Social Science Contributions to Ecosystem Management , 1998 .

[11]  D. Jackson.  Experimental removal of introduced hedgehogs improves wader nest success in the Western Isles, Scotland , 2001 .

[12]  D. Macdonald,et al.  Non-lethal control of wildlife: using chemical repellents as feeding deterrents for the European badger Meles meles , 2005 .

[13]  B. Minteer,et al.  Why we need an “ecological ethics” , 2005 .

[14]  Alison R. Holt.  Biodiversity definitions vary within the discipline , 2006, Nature.

[15]  D. Ehrenfeld.  CONSERVATION AND THE RIGHTS OF ANIMALS , 1991 .

[16]  Mark D. West.  Applications of computer content analysis , 2001 .

[17]  B. Larson.  The war of the roses: demilitarizing invasion biology , 2005 .

[18]  J. P. Collins,et al.  Ecological Ethics: Building a New Tool Kit for Ecologists and Biodiversity Managers , 2005 .

[19]  D. Flaspohler,et al.  Application of Conservation Biology Research to Management , 2000, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[20]  O. Holsti.  Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities , 1969 .

[21]  R. Weber.  Basic Content Analysis , 1986 .

[22]  Mark D. West.  Theory, method, and practice in computer content analysis , 2001 .

[23]  Dan Perry,et al.  Improving Interactions between Animal Rights Groups and Conservation Biologists , 2008, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[24]  Stephen M. Redpath,et al.  Using Decision Modeling with Stakeholders to Reduce Human–Wildlife Conflict: a Raptor–Grouse Case Study , 2004 .

[25]  Robert E. Wright,et al.  Valuing the diversity of biodiversity , 2006 .

[26]  Randy Hodson,et al.  Analyzing Documentary Accounts , 1999 .

[27]  A. Gray.  Ecology and government policies: the GM crop debate* , 2004 .

[28]  Robert M. Entman,et al.  Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm , 1993 .