Nucleosome-mediated cooperativity between transcription factors

Cooperative binding of transcription factors (TFs) to promoters and other regulatory regions is essential for precise gene expression. The classical model of cooperativity requires direct interactions between TFs, thus constraining the arrangement of TF sites in regulatory regions. Recent genomic and functional studies, however, demonstrate a great deal of flexibility in such arrangements with variable distances, numbers of sites, and identities of TF sites located in cis-regulatory regions. Such flexibility is inconsistent with cooperativity by direct interactions between TFs. Here, we demonstrate that strong cooperativity among noninteracting TFs can be achieved by their competition with nucleosomes. We find that the mechanism of nucleosome-mediated cooperativity is analogous to cooperativity in another multimolecular complex: hemoglobin. This surprising analogy provides deep insights, with parallels between the heterotropic regulation of hemoglobin (e.g., the Bohr effect) and the roles of nucleosome-positioning sequences and chromatin modifications in gene expression. Nucleosome-mediated cooperativity is consistent with several experimental studies, is equally applicable to repressors and activators, allows substantial flexibility in and modularity of regulatory regions, and provides a rationale for a broad range of genomic and evolutionary observations. Striking parallels between cooperativity in hemoglobin and in transcriptional regulation point to a general mechanism that can be used in various biological systems.

[1]  Irene K. Moore,et al.  High Nucleosome Occupancy Is Encoded at Human Regulatory Sequences , 2010, PloS one.

[2]  Timothy R. Hughes,et al.  G+C content dominates intrinsic nucleosome occupancy , 2009, BMC Bioinformatics.

[3]  A. Hartemink,et al.  An ensemble model of competitive multi-factor binding of the genome. , 2009, Genome research.

[4]  L. Mirny,et al.  Different gene regulation strategies revealed by analysis of binding motifs. , 2009, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[5]  Alexandre V. Morozov,et al.  Using DNA mechanics to predict in vitro nucleosome positions and formation energies , 2009, Nucleic acids research.

[6]  Eran Segal,et al.  Incorporating Nucleosomes into Thermodynamic Models of Transcription Regulation , 2009, RECOMB.

[7]  Irene K. Moore,et al.  The DNA-encoded nucleosome organization of a eukaryotic genome , 2009, Nature.

[8]  Kwang-Hwi Cho,et al.  BIOPHYSICS AND COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY , 2009 .

[9]  E. O’Shea,et al.  A quantitative model of transcription factor–activated gene expression , 2008, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[10]  Steven M. Johnson,et al.  A high-resolution, nucleosome position map of C. elegans reveals a lack of universal sequence-dictated positioning. , 2008, Genome research.

[11]  J. Langowski,et al.  Spontaneous access to DNA target sites in folded chromatin fibers. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.

[12]  Venky N. Iyer,et al.  Sepsid even-skipped Enhancers Are Functionally Conserved in Drosophila Despite Lack of Sequence Conservation , 2008, PLoS genetics.

[13]  Stephan C. Schuster,et al.  Nucleosome organization in the Drosophila genome , 2008, Nature.

[14]  E. O’Shea,et al.  Chromatin decouples promoter threshold from dynamic range , 2008, Nature.

[15]  Kim Sneppen,et al.  Ultrasensitive gene regulation by positive feedback loops in nucleosome modification , 2008, Molecular systems biology.

[16]  J. Stamatoyannopoulos,et al.  Interaction of the Glucocorticoid Receptor with the Chromatin Landscape , 2008, Molecular cell.

[17]  M. Levine,et al.  A systems view of Drosophila segmentation , 2008, Genome Biology.

[18]  A. Erkine,et al.  Different Requirements of the SWI/SNF Complex for Robust Nucleosome Displacement at Promoters of Heat Shock Factor and Msn2- and Msn4-Regulated Heat Shock Genes , 2007, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[19]  R. Morse.  Transcription factor access to promoter elements , 2007, Journal of cellular biochemistry.

[20]  Ronald W. Davis,et al.  A high-resolution atlas of nucleosome occupancy in yeast , 2007, Nature Genetics.

[21]  William Stafford Noble,et al.  Nucleosome positioning signals in genomic DNA. , 2007, Genome research.

[22]  Robert F. Murphy,et al.  Automated image analysis of protein localization in budding yeast , 2007, ISMB/ECCB.

[23]  S. Harrison,et al.  An Atomic Model of the Interferon-β Enhanceosome , 2007, Cell.

[24]  S. Henikoff,et al.  Histone Replacement Marks the Boundaries of cis-Regulatory Domains , 2007, Science.

[25]  Nir Friedman,et al.  Dynamics of Replication-Independent Histone Turnover in Budding Yeast , 2007, Science.

[26]  Bing Li,et al.  The Role of Chromatin during Transcription , 2007, Cell.

[27]  S. Quake,et al.  A Systems Approach to Measuring the Binding Energy Landscapes of Transcription Factors , 2007, Science.

[28]  Rob Phillips,et al.  Biological consequences of tightly bent DNA: the other life of a macromolecular celebrity. , 2006, Biopolymers.

[29]  I. Albert,et al.  Nucleosome positions predicted through comparative genomics , 2006, Nature Genetics.

[30]  Irene K. Moore,et al.  A genomic code for nucleosome positioning , 2006, Nature.

[31]  David A. Nix,et al.  Large-Scale Turnover of Functional Transcription Factor Binding Sites in Drosophila , 2006, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[32]  William Stafford Noble,et al.  Genome-scale mapping of DNase I sensitivity in vivo using tiling DNA microarrays , 2006, Nature Methods.

[33]  Monica L. Skoge,et al.  Receptor-receptor coupling in bacterial chemotaxis: evidence for strongly coupled clusters. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[34]  Leonor Saiz,et al.  DNA looping: the consequences and its control. , 2006, Current opinion in structural biology.

[35]  E. Davidson.  The Regulatory Genome: Gene Regulatory Networks In Development And Evolution , 2006 .

[36]  Michael Q. Zhang,et al.  A clustering property of highly-degenerate transcription factor binding sites in the mammalian genome , 2006, Nucleic acids research.

[37]  John Reinitz,et al.  Bicoid cooperative DNA binding is critical for embryonic patterning in Drosophila. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  宁北芳,et al.  疟原虫var基因转换速率变化导致抗原变异[英]／Paul H, Robert P, Christodoulou Z, et al//Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A , 2005 .

[39]  Kevin Struhl,et al.  Intrinsic histone-DNA interactions and low nucleosome density are important for preferential accessibility of promoter regions in yeast. , 2005, Molecular cell.

[40]  J. Changeux,et al.  Allosteric Mechanisms of Signal Transduction , 2005, Science.

[41]  A. Fersht,et al.  Comparative binding of p53 to its promoter and DNA recognition elements. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[42]  Archana Dhasarathy,et al.  Promoter Occupancy Is a Major Determinant of Chromatin Remodeling Enzyme Requirements , 2005, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[43]  David N Arnosti,et al.  Transcriptional enhancers: Intelligent enhanceosomes or flexible billboards? , 2005, Journal of cellular biochemistry.

[44]  Terence Hwa,et al.  Transcriptional regulation by the numbers: models. , 2005, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[45]  C. Bustamante,et al.  Rapid spontaneous accessibility of nucleosomal DNA , 2005, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[46]  J. Stamatoyannopoulos,et al.  Discovery of functional noncoding elements by digital analysis of chromatin structure. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[47]  J. Fak,et al.  Transcriptional Control in the Segmentation Gene Network of Drosophila , 2004, PLoS biology.

[48]  S. Schreiber,et al.  Global nucleosome occupancy in yeast , 2004, Genome Biology.

[49]  S. Salzberg,et al.  Computational identification of developmental enhancers: conservation and function of transcription factor binding-site clusters in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila pseudoobscura , 2004, Genome Biology.

[50]  J. Lieb,et al.  Evidence for nucleosome depletion at active regulatory regions genome-wide , 2004, Nature Genetics.

[51]  J. Widom,et al.  Nucleosomes facilitate their own invasion , 2004, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[52]  Tom Misteli,et al.  Global Nature of Dynamic Protein-Chromatin Interactions In Vivo: Three-Dimensional Genome Scanning and Dynamic Interaction Networks of Chromatin Proteins , 2004, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[53]  Johannes Berg,et al.  Adaptive evolution of transcription factor binding sites , 2003, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[54]  Saurabh Sinha,et al.  A probabilistic method to detect regulatory modules , 2003, ISMB.

[55]  R. Morse.  Getting into chromatin: how do transcription factors get past the histones? , 2003, Biochemistry and cell biology = Biochimie et biologie cellulaire.

[56]  J. Widom,et al.  Collaborative Competition Mechanism for Gene Activation In Vivo , 2003, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[57]  Anna G. Nazina,et al.  Extraction of functional binding sites from unique regulatory regions: the Drosophila early developmental enhancers. , 2002, Genome research.

[58]  J. Widom,et al.  Effects of histone acetylation on the equilibrium accessibility of nucleosomal DNA target sites. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[59]  J. Widom,et al.  Sequence and position-dependence of the equilibrium accessibility of nucleosomal DNA target sites. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[60]  Q Gao,et al.  Targeting gene expression to the head: the Drosophila orthodenticle gene is a direct target of the Bicoid morphogen. , 1998, Development.

[61]  R. L. Baldwin,et al.  Alternative models for describing the acid unfolding of the apomyoglobin folding intermediate. , 1998, Biochemistry.

[62]  Karsten Melcher,et al.  Evidence for two modes of cooperative DNA binding in vivo that do not involve direct protein–protein interactions , 1998, Current Biology.

[63]  M. Borodovsky,et al.  Nucleosome DNA sequence pattern revealed by multiple alignment of experimentally mapped sequences. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[64]  J. Widom,et al.  A model for the cooperative binding of eukaryotic regulatory proteins to nucleosomal target sites. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[65]  M. Levine,et al.  The eve stripe 2 enhancer employs multiple modes of transcriptional synergy. , 1996, Development.

[66]  J. Widom,et al.  Mechanism of protein access to specific DNA sequences in chromatin: a dynamic equilibrium model for gene regulation. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[67]  T. Kodadek,et al.  A single GAL4 dimer can maximally activate transcription under physiological conditions. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[68]  V. Iyer,et al.  Poly(dA:dT), a ubiquitous promoter element that stimulates transcription via its intrinsic DNA structure. , 1995, The EMBO journal.

[69]  C C Adams,et al.  Binding of disparate transcriptional activators to nucleosomal DNA is inherently cooperative , 1995, Molecular and cellular biology.

[70]  D. S. Gross,et al.  A critical role for heat shock transcription factor in establishing a nucleosome‐free region over the TATA‐initiation site of the yeast HSP82 heat shock gene. , 1993, The EMBO journal.

[71]  K. Struhl,et al.  Synergistic transcriptional enhancement does not depend on the number of acidic activation domains bound to the promoter. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[72]  W. Schaffner,et al.  Synergistic activation of transcription by multiple binding sites for NF-kappa B even in absence of co-operative factor binding to DNA. , 1990, Journal of molecular biology.

[73]  Michael Carey,et al.  How different eukaryotic transcriptional activators can cooperate promiscuously , 1990, Nature.

[74]  E. Trifonov,et al.  The pitch of chromatin DNA is reflected in its nucleotide sequence. , 1980, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[75]  J. Changeux,et al.  ON THE NATURE OF ALLOSTERIC TRANSITIONS: A PLAUSIBLE MODEL. , 1965, Journal of molecular biology.

[76]  F. Ransom.  A contribution to the study of muscle‐enzymes , 1910, The Journal of physiology.

[77]  A. Hill,et al.  The possible effects of the aggregation of the molecules of haemoglobin on its dissociation curves , 1910 .