De-noising ghost imaging via principal components analysis and compandor

Abstract Improving the ghost imaging quality and speed remains a challenging task. Here, we propose an optimization algorithm model to the ghost imaging by employing principal components analysis and companding technique. By choosing appropriate parameters of the principal components and the companding function, the ghost image quality is enhanced. A good agreement between the simulation and the experiment result is obtained. In addition, we demonstrate the method with a complicated sample compared with the other five existing algorithms, indicating its advantages for wide range of applications. At last, a criteria function is firstly proposed and built to optimize the parameters for better reconstruction result without the prior information of the object. This optimization model may offer a promising implementation of de-noising ghost imaging.

[1]  Shih,et al.  Optical imaging by means of two-photon quantum entanglement. , 1995, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[2]  Jeffrey H. Shapiro,et al.  Computational ghost imaging , 2008, 2009 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics and 2009 Conference on Quantum electronics and Laser Science Conference.

[3]  Marc Teboulle,et al.  A Fast Iterative Shrinkage-Thresholding Algorithm for Linear Inverse Problems , 2009, SIAM J. Imaging Sci..

[4]  Ling-An Wu,et al.  Correlated two-photon imaging with true thermal light. , 2005, Optics letters.

[5]  J. Shapiro,et al.  Normalized ghost imaging , 2012, 1212.5041.

[6]  Jeffrey H. Shapiro,et al.  The physics of ghost imaging , 2012, Quantum Information Processing.

[7]  A. Gatti,et al.  Differential ghost imaging. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[8]  A Gatti,et al.  Entangled imaging and wave-particle duality: from the microscopic to the macroscopic realm. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[9]  H. Hotelling Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components. , 1933 .

[10]  M. Loève Fundamental Limit Theorems of Probability Theory , 1950 .

[11]  J. Astola,et al.  Compressive sensing computational ghost imaging. , 2012, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[12]  Kari Karhunen,et al.  Über lineare Methoden in der Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung , 1947 .

[13]  Sub-wavelength interference in macroscopic observation , 2004 .

[14]  Karl Pearson F.R.S. LIII. On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space , 1901 .

[15]  Ling-An Wu,et al.  Iterative denoising of ghost imaging. , 2014, Optics express.

[16]  Shensheng Han,et al.  Incoherent coincidence imaging and its applicability in X-ray diffraction. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[17]  Vijander Singh,et al.  Image Compression Using PCA and Improved Technique with MLP Neural Network , 2010, 2010 International Conference on Advances in Recent Technologies in Communication and Computing.

[18]  Vijayan K. Asari,et al.  An improved face recognition technique based on modular PCA approach , 2004, Pattern Recognit. Lett..