A participative approach to develop sustainability indicators for dehesa agroforestry farms.

This paper provides a list of specific indicators that will allow the managers of dehesa farms to assess their sustainability in an easy and reliable way. To this end a Delphi analysis has been carried out with a group of experts in agroforestry systems and sustainability. A total of 30 experts from public institutions, farming, research bodies, environmental and rural development associations, agricultural organizations and companies took part in the study which intended to design a set of sustainability indicators adapted to dehesa agroforestry systems. The experts scored 83 original indicators related to the basic pillars of sustainability (environmental, social and economic) through a two-round procedure. Finally, 24 indicators were selected based on their importance and the consensus achieved. From an environmental point of view, and in line with its significance for dehesa ecosystems, it has been observed that "Stocking rate" is the indicator with greater relevance. Within the economic pillar, "Farm profitability" is the most important indicator, while regarding the technical indicators "Percentage of animal diet based on grazing" is the one that got the highest score. Finally, the "Degree of job satisfaction" and the "Generational renewal" were the most relevant labor indicators. It is considered that the Delphi approach used in this research settles some of the flaws of other sustainability models, such as the adaptation to the system to be studied and the involvement of stakeholders in the design.

[1]  A. S. M. Ayanz.  La dehesa española: orígen, tipología, características y gestión , 1994 .

[2]  P. Gaspar,et al.  A qualitative approach to study social perceptions and public policies in dehesa agroforestry systems , 2016 .

[3]  L. Jacxsens,et al.  Towards strategies to adapt to pressures on safety of fresh produce due to climate change , 2015 .

[4]  Sergio Rubio,et al.  Innovations and trends in meat consumption: an application of the Delphi method in Spain. , 2012, Meat science.

[5]  J. Landeta.  Current validity of the Delphi method in social sciences , 2006 .

[6]  J. A. Sánchez,et al.  Development of sustainability reports for farming operations in the Basque Country using the Delphi method , 2015 .

[7]  H. Steinfeld,et al.  Livestock's Long Shadow , 2006 .

[8]  D. Ferraro,et al.  Ecosystem Services Provided by Agroecosystems: A Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment of this Relationship in the Pampa Region, Argentina , 2014, Environmental Management.

[9]  F. Alcon,et al.  Forecasting deficit irrigation adoption using a mixed stakeholder assessment methodology , 2014 .

[10]  Young Jin Lee,et al.  Sustainable management of forest in view of media attention to REDD + policy, opportunity and impact in Cambodia , 2017 .

[11]  Francisco J. Mesías,et al.  Sheep farms in the Spanish rangelands (dehesas): Typologies according to livestock management and economic indicators , 2008 .

[12]  Jon Barrutia,et al.  People consultation to construct the future: A Delphi application , 2011 .

[13]  F. A. Ruiz,et al.  Characterization and typification of small ruminant farms providing fuelbreak grazing services for wildfire prevention in Andalusia (Spain). , 2016, The Science of the total environment.

[14]  A. Olaizola,et al.  Perspectivas de una carne de calidad diferenciada: análisis exploratorio para la carne de vacuno Serrana de Teruel , 2012 .

[15]  P. Gaspar,et al.  Economic and management characterization of dehesa farms: implications for their sustainability , 2007, Agroforestry Systems.

[16]  R. Arjmandi,et al.  Sustainability indicators for municipalities of megacities: Integrating health, safety and environmental performance , 2017 .

[17]  Hermann Lotze-Campen,et al.  Simulating and delineating future land change trajectories across Europe , 2018, Regional Environmental Change.

[18]  D. J. Pilbeam,et al.  Silvoarable Systems in Europe – Past, Present and Future Prospects , 2006, Agroforestry Systems.

[19]  N. Dalkey,et al.  An Experimental Application of the Delphi Method to the Use of Experts , 1963 .

[20]  M. Schelhaas,et al.  A theoretical framework to assess the impacts of forest management on the recreational value of European forests , 2011 .

[21]  F. Jia,et al.  Technological innovation in agricultural co-operatives in China: Implications for agro-food innovation policies , 2017 .

[22]  Gene Rowe,et al.  The views of key stakeholders on an evolving food risk governance framework: Results from a Delphi study , 2009 .

[23]  A. J. Escribano,et al.  The role of the level of intensification, productive orientation and self-reliance in extensive beef cattle farms , 2016 .

[24]  J. Martínez-Paz,et al.  What weight should be assigned to future environmental impacts? A probabilistic cost benefit analysis using recent advances on discounting. , 2011, The Science of the total environment.

[25]  Roberto Ruiz,et al.  An integrated sustainability assessment of mediterranean sheep farms with different degrees of intensification , 2012 .

[26]  A. Horrillo,et al.  Is there a future for organic production in high ecological value ecosystems , 2016 .

[27]  Philip J. Jones,et al.  Assessing the potential economic benefits to farmers from various GM crops becoming available in the European Union by 2025: Results from an expert survey , 2017 .

[28]  Roberto Ruiz,et al.  Sustainability of pasture-based livestock farming systems in the European Mediterranean context: Synergies and trade-offs , 2011 .

[29]  E. Jónsdóttir,et al.  Soil indicators for sustainable development: A transdisciplinary approach for indicator development using expert stakeholders , 2016 .

[30]  Murray Turoff,et al.  Delphi: A brief look backward and forward , 2011 .

[31]  S. Rambal,et al.  The dehesa system of southern Spain and Portugal as a natural ecosystem mimic , 1999, Agroforestry Systems.

[32]  Anne Vanasse,et al.  Development of agri-environmental indicators to assess dairy farm sustainability in Quebec, Eastern Canada , 2012 .