Dynamical model of binary asteroid systems through patched three-body problems

The paper presents a strategy for trajectory design in the proximity of a binary asteroid pair. A novel patched approach has been used to design trajectories in the binary system, which is modeled by means of two different three-body systems. The model introduces some degrees of freedom with respect to a classical two-body approach and it is intended to model to higher accuracy the peculiar dynamical properties of such irregular and low gravity field bodies, while keeping the advantages of having a full analytical formulation and low computational cost required. The neighborhood of the asteroid couple is split into two regions of influence where two different three-body problems describe the dynamics of the spacecraft. These regions have been identified by introducing the concept of surface of equivalence (SOE), a three-dimensional surface that serves as boundary between the regions of influence of each dynamical model. A case of study is presented, in terms of potential scenario that may benefit of such an approach in solving its mission analysis. Cost-effective solutions to land a vehicle on the surface of a low gravity body are selected by generating Poincaré maps on the SOE, seeking intersections between stable and unstable manifolds of the two patched three-body systems.

[1]  A. McEwen,et al.  Galileo Encounter with 951 Gaspra: First Pictures of an Asteroid , 1992, Science.

[2]  DJ SCHEERES,et al.  Stability of Relative Equilibria in the Full Two‐Body Problem , 2004, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[3]  D. D. Mueller,et al.  Fundamentals of Astrodynamics , 1971 .

[4]  D. Scheeres.  Dynamics about Uniformly Rotating Triaxial Ellipsoids: Applications to Asteroids , 1994 .

[5]  A. Maciejewski,et al.  Unrestricted Planar Problem of a Symmetric Body and a Point Mass. Triangular Libration Points and Their Stability , 1999 .

[6]  J. Marsden,et al.  Dynamical Systems, the Three-Body Problem and Space Mission Design , 2009 .

[7]  S. Ostro,et al.  Radar Observations of Asteroid 2063 Bacchus , 1999 .

[8]  E. Dejong,et al.  Dynamics of Orbits Close to Asteroid 4179 Toutatis , 1998 .

[9]  D. Campbell,et al.  Binary Asteroids in the Near-Earth Object Population , 2002, Science.

[10]  S. D. Howard,et al.  Extreme elongation of asteroid 1620 Geographos from radar images , 1995, Nature.

[11]  AIDA: Test of Asteroid Deflection by Spacecraft Impact , 2013 .

[12]  A. McEwen,et al.  First Images of Asteroid 243 Ida , 1994, Science.

[13]  Jerrold E. Marsden,et al.  Parking a Spacecraft near an Asteroid Pair , 2006 .

[14]  V. Szebehely,et al.  Theory of Orbits: The Restricted Problem of Three Bodies , 1967 .

[15]  Shane D. Ross,et al.  Connecting orbits and invariant manifolds in the spatial restricted three-body problem , 2004 .

[16]  D. Scheeres,et al.  General dynamics in the Restricted Full Three Body Problem , 2006 .

[17]  Trojan Asteroid 624 Hektor: Constraints on Surface Composition , 2000 .

[18]  Zuber,et al.  The shape of 433 eros from the NEAR-shoemaker laser rangefinder , 2000, Science.

[19]  Daniel J. Scheeres,et al.  The Restricted Hill Full 4-Body Problem: application to spacecraft motion about binary asteroids , 2005 .

[20]  S. Ostro,et al.  Radar observations of asteroid 216 kleopatra , 2000, Science.

[21]  D. Scheeres,et al.  Exterior gravitation of a polyhedron derived and compared with harmonic and mascon gravitation representations of asteroid 4769 Castalia , 1996 .

[22]  Radar Image of Asteroid 1989 PB , 1990, Science.

[23]  Steven J. Ostro,et al.  Asteroid 4179 Toutatis: 1996 Radar Observations , 1999 .