Semantic representation of monogenean haptoral Bar image annotation

BackgroundDigitised monogenean images are usually stored in file system directories in an unstructured manner. In this paper we propose a semantic representation of these images in the form of a Monogenean Haptoral Bar Image (MHBI) ontology, which are annotated with taxonomic classification, diagnostic hard part and image properties. The data we used are basically of the monogenean species found in fish, thus we built a simple Fish ontology to demonstrate how the host (fish) ontology can be linked to the MHBI ontology. This will enable linking of information from the monogenean ontology to the host species found in the fish ontology without changing the underlying schema for either of the ontologies.ResultsIn this paper, we utilized the Taxonomic Data Working Group Life Sciences Identifier (TDWG LSID) vocabulary to represent our data and defined a new vocabulary which is specific for annotating monogenean haptoral bar images to develop the MHBI ontology and a merged MHBI-Fish ontologies. These ontologies are successfully evaluated using five criteria which are clarity, coherence, extendibility, ontology commitment and encoding bias.ConclusionsIn this paper, we show that unstructured data can be represented in a structured form using semantics. In the process, we have come up with a new vocabulary for annotating the monogenean images with textual information. The proposed monogenean image ontology will form the basis of a monogenean knowledge base to assist researchers in retrieving information for their analysis.

[1]  Arpah Abu THE USE OF INFORMATION CLASSIFICATION IN FACE RECOGNITION AND IDENTIFICATION USING EIGENFACES , 2007 .

[2]  L. H. S. Lim,et al.  Bravohollisia Bychowsky & Nagibina, 1970 and Caballeria Bychowsky & Nagibina, 1970 (Monogenea: Ancyrocephalidae) from Pomadasys hasta (Bloch) (Pomadasyidae), with the description of a new attachment mechanism , 1995, Systematic Parasitology.

[3]  Thomas R. Gruber,et al.  Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing? , 1995, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[4]  Robert K. Colwell,et al.  Biota: The Biodiversity Database Manager , 1996 .

[5]  Jia Liu,et al.  XML-Based Data Model and Architecture for a Knowledge-Based Grid-Enabled Problem-Solving Environment for High-Throughput Biological Imaging , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[6]  Amandeep S. Sidhu,et al.  Biodiversity image retrieval framework for monogeneans , 2013 .

[7]  Hong Cui,et al.  Semantic annotation of morphological descriptions: an overall strategy , 2010, BMC Bioinformatics.

[8]  Steffen Staab,et al.  Programming the Semantic Web , 2014, ESWC.

[9]  Douglas A. Creager,et al.  The Open Microscopy Environment (OME) Data Model and XML file: open tools for informatics and quantitative analysis in biological imaging , 2005, Genome Biology.

[10]  Deborah L. McGuinness,et al.  OWL Web ontology language overview , 2004 .

[11]  Deborah L. McGuinness,et al.  Owl web ontology language guide , 2003 .

[12]  Tharam S. Dillon,et al.  Protein ontology: vocabulary for protein data , 2005, Third International Conference on Information Technology and Applications (ICITA'05).

[13]  Arpah A. Sarinder K. K. S. Lim,et al.  A Database Management System (DBMS) for Monogenean Taxonomy , 2010 .

[14]  Colin Evans,et al.  Programming the Semantic Web , 2009 .

[15]  David Taniar,et al.  Strategic Advancements in Utilizing Data Mining and Warehousing Technologies: New Concepts and Developments , 2009, Strategic Advancements in Utilizing Data Mining and Warehousing Technologies.