Visual learning with reduced adaptation is eccentricity-specific

Visual learning is known to be specific to the trained target location, showing little transfer to untrained locations. Recently, learning was shown to transfer across equal-eccentricity retinal-locations when sensory adaptation due to repetitive stimulation was minimized. It was suggested that learning transfers to previously untrained locations when the learned representation is location invariant, with sensory adaptation introducing location-dependent representations, thus preventing transfer. Spatial invariance may also fail when the trained and tested locations are at different distance from the center of gaze (different retinal eccentricities), due to differences in the corresponding low-level cortical representations (e.g. allocated cortical area decreases with eccentricity). Thus, if learning improves performance by better classifying target-dependent early visual representations, generalization is predicted to fail when locations of different retinal eccentricities are trained and tested in the absence sensory adaptation. Here, using the texture discrimination task, we show specificity of learning across different retinal eccentricities (4–8°) using reduced adaptation training. The existence of generalization across equal-eccentricity locations but not across different eccentricities demonstrates that learning accesses visual representations preceding location independent representations, with specificity of learning explained by inhomogeneous sensory representation.

[1]  Jonathan Winawer,et al.  Imaging retinotopic maps in the human brain , 2011, Vision Research.

[2]  A Pantle,et al.  Size-Detecting Mechanisms in Human Vision , 1968, Science.

[3]  Dov Sagi,et al.  Target-selective tilt aftereffect during texture learning , 2016, Vision Research.

[4]  D Sagi,et al.  Where practice makes perfect in texture discrimination: evidence for primary visual cortex plasticity. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  S. Dumoulin,et al.  The Relationship between Cortical Magnification Factor and Population Receptive Field Size in Human Visual Cortex: Constancies in Cortical Architecture , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  Wu Li,et al.  Perceptual learning beyond retinotopic reference frame , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  S. Klein,et al.  Rule-Based Learning Explains Visual Perceptual Learning and Its Specificity and Transfer , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  S. Hochstein,et al.  Attentional control of early perceptual learning. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  Dov Sagi,et al.  Perceptual learning in autism: over-specificity and possible remedies , 2015, Nature Neuroscience.

[10]  Dov Sagi,et al.  Two‐stage model in perceptual learning: toward a unified theory , 2014, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[11]  S. Klein,et al.  Vernier perceptual learning transfers to completely untrained retinal locations after double training: a "piggybacking" effect. , 2014, Journal of vision.

[12]  S. Klein,et al.  Complete Transfer of Perceptual Learning across Retinal Locations Enabled by Double Training , 2008, Current Biology.

[13]  E. Mercado,et al.  Commentary: Perceptual learning in autism: over-specificity and possible remedies , 2016, Front. Integr. Neurosci..

[14]  D. Sagi,et al.  Benefits of efficient consolidation: Short training enables long-term resistance to perceptual adaptation induced by intensive testing , 2008, Vision Research.

[15]  Robert O. Duncan,et al.  Cortical Magnification within Human Primary Visual Cortex Correlates with Acuity Thresholds , 2003, Neuron.

[16]  Dov Sagi,et al.  A dissociation between consolidated perceptual learning and sensory adaptation in vision , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[17]  T Poggio,et al.  Fast perceptual learning in visual hyperacuity. , 1991, Science.

[18]  J. Mollon,et al.  Three remarks on perceptual learning. , 1996, Spatial vision.

[19]  Barbara Anne Dosher,et al.  Modeling mechanisms of perceptual learning with augmented Hebbian re-weighting , 2010, Vision Research.

[20]  Uri Polat,et al.  Gains following perceptual learning are closely linked to the initial visual acuity , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[21]  Robert Pepperell,et al.  The Perceived Size and Shape of Objects in Peripheral Vision , 2016, i-Perception.

[22]  D. Sagi,et al.  Effects of trial repetition in texture discrimination , 2007, Vision Research.

[23]  D. Sagi,et al.  Effects of spatiotemporal consistencies on visual learning dynamics and transfer , 2015, Vision Research.

[24]  B. Dosher,et al.  Mechanisms of perceptual learning , 1999, Vision Research.

[25]  B. Dosher,et al.  Visual Perceptual Learning and Models. , 2017, Annual review of vision science.

[26]  J. Rovamo,et al.  Visual resolution, contrast sensitivity, and the cortical magnification factor , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[27]  Misha Tsodyks,et al.  Perceptual learning in contrast discrimination: the effect of contrast uncertainty. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[28]  Masako Tamaki,et al.  Overlearning hyper-stabilizes a skill by rapidly making neurochemical processing inhibitory-dominant , 2017, Nature Neuroscience.

[29]  D. Heeger,et al.  Response: Commentary: Perceptual learning in autism: over-specificity and possible remedies , 2016, Front. Integr. Neurosci..

[30]  A. Dale,et al.  From retinotopy to recognition: fMRI in human visual cortex , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[31]  E. Zohary,et al.  The coordinate frame of pop-out learning , 2008, Vision Research.

[32]  A. Karni,et al.  The time course of learning a visual skill , 1993, Nature.

[33]  C. Curcio,et al.  Topography of ganglion cells in human retina , 1990, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[34]  S. Klein,et al.  Perceptual learning of contrast discrimination , 2010 .

[35]  J. Horton,et al.  The representation of the visual field in human striate cortex. A revision of the classic Holmes map. , 1991, Archives of ophthalmology.

[36]  L. Kehrer Central performance drop on perceptual segregation tasks. , 1989, Spatial vision.

[37]  D. Sagi Perceptual learning in Vision Research , 2011, Vision Research.

[38]  M. Carrasco,et al.  The locus of attentional effects in texture segmentation , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[39]  Adrian T. Lee,et al.  fMRI of human visual cortex , 1994, Nature.

[40]  Dov Sagi,et al.  The psychophysics of texture segmentation , 1995 .

[41]  Daphna Weinshall,et al.  Mechanisms of generalization in perceptual learning , 1998, Vision Research.

[42]  Mark W. Greenlee,et al.  Interactions among spatial frequency and orientation channels adapted concurrently , 1988, Vision Research.

[43]  M Fahle,et al.  Interobserver variance in perceptual performance and learning. , 1996, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[44]  S. Hochstein,et al.  Task difficulty and the specificity of perceptual learning , 1997, Nature.

[45]  Dov Sagi,et al.  A link between perceptual learning, adaptation and sleep , 2006, Vision Research.

[46]  Dennis M. Levi,et al.  Decoupling location specificity from perceptual learning of orientation discrimination , 2010, Vision Research.

[47]  Uri Polat,et al.  Collinear facilitation and suppression at the periphery , 2011, Vision Research.

[48]  Miguel P Eckstein,et al.  Template changes with perceptual learning are driven by feature informativeness. , 2014, Journal of vision.

[49]  R. Sekuler,et al.  A specific and enduring improvement in visual motion discrimination. , 1982, Science.

[50]  D. Sagi,et al.  Generalized Perceptual Learning in the Absence of Sensory Adaptation , 2012, Current Biology.

[51]  M. Webster Adaptation and visual coding. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[52]  Thomas E. Gorman,et al.  Perceptual Learning Generalization from Sequential Perceptual Training as a Change in Learning Rate , 2017, Current Biology.

[53]  L. R. Newsome,et al.  Visual angle and apparent size of objects in peripheral vision , 1972 .

[54]  R. Henson,et al.  Multiple levels of visual object constancy revealed by event-related fMRI of repetition priming , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[55]  Dov Sagi,et al.  Eccentricity effects on lateral interactions , 2005, Vision Research.