Enhancing Digital Simulated Laboratory Assessments: a Test of Pre-Laboratory Activities with the Learning Error and Formative Feedback Model

Digitally simulated laboratory assessments (DSLAs) may be used to measure competencies such as problem solving and scientific inquiry because they provide an environment that allows the process of learning to be captured. These assessments provide many benefits that are superior to traditional hands-on laboratory tasks; as such, it is important to investigate different ways to maximize the potential of DSLAs in increasing student learning. This study investigated two enhancements—a pre-laboratory activity (PLA) and a learning error intervention (LEI)—that are hypothesized to enhance the use of DSLAs as an educational tool. The results indicate students who were administered the PLA reported statistically lower levels of test anxiety when compared to their peers who did not receive the activity. Furthermore, students who received the LEI scored statistically higher scores on the more difficult problems administered during and after the DSLA. These findings provide preliminary evidence that both a PLA and LEI may be beneficial in improving students’ performance on a DSLA. Understanding the benefits of these enhancements may help educators better utilize DSLAs in the classroom to improve student science achievement.

[1]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 1983 .

[2]  P. Pintrich,et al.  Reliability and Predictive Validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (Mslq) , 1993 .

[3]  Mable B. Kinzie,et al.  Student Achievement and Attitudes in a Pilot Study Comparing an Interactive Videodisc Simulation to Conventional Dissection. , 1994 .

[4]  D. Bandalos,et al.  Effects of math self-concept, perceived self-efficacy, and attributions for failure and success on test anxiety , 1995 .

[5]  D. Hodson.  Laboratory work as scientific method: three decades of confusion and distortion , 1996 .

[6]  V. Hodapp,et al.  The multidimensionality of test anxiety: A test of different models , 1997 .

[7]  W. V. van Joolingen,et al.  Scientific Discovery Learning with Computer Simulations of Conceptual Domains , 1998 .

[8]  Ton de Jong,et al.  Scientific Discovery Learning with Computer Simulations of Conceptual Domains , 1998 .

[9]  David M. Shannon,et al.  The Patterns of Adaptive Learning Survey: A Comparison across Grade Levels , 2002 .

[10]  Vincent N. Lunetta,et al.  The Laboratory in Science Education: Foundations for the Twenty-First Century , 2004 .

[11]  W. McKeachie,et al.  The Making of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire , 2005 .

[12]  Alija Kulenović,et al.  Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing , 1999 .

[13]  Sami Sahin,et al.  COMPUTER SIMULATIONS IN SCIENCE EDUCATION: Implications for Distance Education , 2006 .

[14]  Jeffrey V. Nickerson,et al.  Hands-on, simulated, and remote laboratories: A comparative literature review , 2006, CSUR.

[15]  N. Reid,et al.  The role of laboratory work in university chemistry , 2007 .

[16]  Randy Elliot Bennett,et al.  Problem Solving in Technology-Rich Environments. A Report from the NAEP Technology-Based Assessment Project, Research and Development Series. NCES 2007-466. , 2007 .

[17]  D. Treagust,et al.  Achieving Greater Feedback and Flexibility Using Online Pre-Laboratory Exercises with Non-Major Chemistry Students. , 2007 .

[18]  Loretta L. Jones,et al.  Impact of a pre-laboratory organic-extraction simulation on comprehension and attitudes of undergraduate chemistry students , 2008 .

[19]  Michael J Timms,et al.  Using Simulations to Support Powerful Formative Assessments of Complex Science Learning , 2009 .

[20]  Barbara C. Buckley,et al.  Examining the Relationship Between Students’ Understanding of the Nature of Models and Conceptual Learning in Biology, Physics, and Chemistry , 2011 .

[21]  M. Credé,et al.  A meta-analytic review of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire , 2011 .

[22]  Jody Clarke‐Midura,et al.  Technology Based Assessment for 21st Century Skills: Theoretical and Practical Implications from Modern Research , 2012 .

[23]  Janice D. Gobert,et al.  From Log Files to Assessment Metrics: Measuring Students' Science Inquiry Skills Using Educational Data Mining , 2013, Journal of the Learning Sciences.

[24]  V. Shute,et al.  Stealth Assessment: Measuring and Supporting Learning in Video Games , 2013 .

[25]  Jacqueline P. Leighton,et al.  Students’ interpersonal trust and attitudes towards standardised tests: exploring affective variables related to student assessment , 2014 .

[26]  Jonathan M. Vitale,et al.  Taking advantage of automated assessment of student‐constructed graphs in science , 2015 .

[27]  M. Dresel,et al.  Learning from errors: A model of individual processes , 2016 .

[28]  Patrick C. Kyllonen,et al.  Socio‐emotional and Self‐management Variables in Learning and Assessment , 2016 .

[29]  Jacqueline P. Leighton,et al.  Using Errors to Enhance Learning Feedback in Computer Programming , 2016 .

[30]  Jacqueline P. Leighton,et al.  A pedagogical alliance for trust, wellbeing and the identification of errors for learning and formative assessment , 2018 .