Spatial partitions systematize visual search and enhance target memory

Humans are remarkably capable of finding desired objects in the world, despite the scale and complexity of naturalistic environments. Broadly, this ability is supported by an interplay between exploratory search and guidance from episodic memory for previously observed target locations. Here we examined how the environment itself may influence this interplay. In particular, we examined how partitions in the environment—like buildings, rooms, and furniture—can impact memory during repeated search. We report that the presence of partitions in a display, independent of item configuration, reliably improves episodic memory for item locations. Repeated search through partitioned displays was faster overall and was characterized by more rapid ballistic orienting in later repetitions. Explicit recall was also both faster and more accurate when displays were partitioned. Finally, we found that search paths were more regular and systematic when displays were partitioned. Given the ubiquity of partitions in real-world environments, these results provide important insights into the mechanisms of naturalistic search and its relation to memory.

[1]  Alan Kingstone,et al.  Balancing energetic and cognitive resources: Memory use during search depends on the orienting effector , 2014, Cognition.

[2]  I. Gilchrist,et al.  Evidence for a systematic component within scan paths in visual search , 2006 .

[3]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  Cognitive maps in children and men. , 1974, Child development.

[4]  Carlo De Lillo,et al.  Imposing structure on a Corsi-type task: Evidence for hierarchical organisation based on spatial proximity in serial-spatial memory , 2004, Brain and Cognition.

[5]  Antonio Torralba,et al.  Contextual guidance of eye movements and attention in real-world scenes: the role of global features in object search. , 2006, Psychological review.

[6]  Melina A. Kunar,et al.  The role of memory and restricted context in repeated visual search , 2008, Perception & psychophysics.

[7]  J. Jonides,et al.  Evidence of hierarchies in cognitive maps , 1985, Memory & cognition.

[8]  Kazuhiko Yokosawa,et al.  Visual search in divided areas: Dividers initially interfere with and later facilitate visual search , 2013, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[9]  Xin Chen,et al.  Real-world visual search is dominated by top-down guidance , 2006, Vision Research.

[10]  Rajesh P. N. Rao,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article EYE MOVEMENTS REVEAL THE SPATIOTEMPORAL DYNAMICS OE VISUAL SEARCH , 2022 .

[11]  Rajesh P. N. Rao,et al.  Eye movements in iconic visual search , 2002, Vision Research.

[12]  C. Koch,et al.  Computational modelling of visual attention , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[13]  Iain D. Gilchrist,et al.  Visual search and foraging compared in a large-scale search task , 2008, Cognitive Processing.

[14]  T. McNamara,et al.  Spatial and temporal contributions to the structure of spatial memory. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[15]  M. Eckstein,et al.  Attentional Cues in Real Scenes, Saccadic Targeting, and Bayesian Priors , 2006 .

[16]  Andrew P. Duchon,et al.  Do Humans Integrate Routes Into a Cognitive Map? Map- Versus Landmark-Based Navigation of Novel Shortcuts , 2005 .

[17]  L. Itti,et al.  Modeling the influence of task on attention , 2005, Vision Research.

[18]  Albert C. Stevens,et al.  Distortions in judged spatial relations , 1978, Cognitive Psychology.

[19]  M. Brodeur,et al.  The Bank of Standardized Stimuli (BOSS), a New Set of 480 Normative Photos of Objects to Be Used as Visual Stimuli in Cognitive Research , 2010, PloS one.

[20]  E. Farmer,et al.  Visual search through color displays: Effects of target-background similarity and background uniformity , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[21]  D. Ballard,et al.  Memory Representations in Natural Tasks , 1995, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[22]  M. Chun,et al.  Perceptual constraints on implicit learning of spatial context , 2002 .

[23]  R. Klein,et al.  On the manifestations of memory in visual search. , 2000, Spatial vision.

[24]  Jeremy M. Wolfe,et al.  Guided Search 4.0: Current Progress With a Model of Visual Search , 2007, Integrated Models of Cognitive Systems.

[25]  Gregory J. Zelinsky,et al.  Scene context guides eye movements during visual search , 2006, Vision Research.

[26]  C. Koch,et al.  A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention , 2000, Vision Research.

[27]  J. Wolfe,et al.  When does repeated search in scenes involve memory? Looking at versus looking for objects in scenes. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[28]  Eva Bertha Kemps,et al.  Effects of Complexity on Visuo-spatial Working Memory , 1999 .

[29]  Alan Kingstone,et al.  Endogenous strategy in exploration. , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[30]  B. Tversky Spatial mental models , 1991 .

[31]  J. Wolfe,et al.  The interplay of episodic and semantic memory in guiding repeated search in scenes , 2013, Cognition.

[32]  Laurent Itti,et al.  A Goal Oriented Attention Guidance Model , 2002, Biologically Motivated Computer Vision.

[33]  Andrew Hollingworth,et al.  Guidance of visual search by memory and knowledge. , 2012, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation.

[34]  T. McNamara Mental representations of spatial relations , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.

[35]  Eyal M. Reingold,et al.  Area activation: a computational model of saccadic selectivity in visual search , 2003, Cogn. Sci..

[36]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Grouping processes in visual search: Effects with single- and combined-feature targets , 1989 .

[37]  M. Chun,et al.  Contextual Cueing: Implicit Learning and Memory of Visual Context Guides Spatial Attention , 1998, Cognitive Psychology.

[38]  E. Kemps,et al.  Complexity effects in visuo-spatial working memory: Implications for the role of long-term memory , 2001, Memory.

[39]  Daniel Smilek,et al.  Item-specific location memory in visual search , 2010, Vision Research.

[40]  C. J. Erkelens,et al.  Control of fixation duration in a simple search task , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[41]  B Hommel,et al.  Hierarchical coding in the perception and memory of spatial layouts , 2000, Psychological research.

[42]  Melissa Kirby,et al.  Spatial working memory in immersive virtual reality foraging: Path organization, traveling distance and search efficiency in humans (Homo sapiens) , 2014, American journal of primatology.

[43]  C Bundesen,et al.  Color segregation and visual search , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[44]  Robert Cohen,et al.  Cognitive Maps of a Naturalistic Setting. , 1978 .

[45]  A. Treisman Perceptual grouping and attention in visual search for features and for objects. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[46]  Yuhong V. Jiang,et al.  What is learned in spatial contextual cuing— configuration or individual locations? , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.

[47]  Daniel Smilek,et al.  Memory benefits during visual search depend on difficulty , 2012 .

[48]  Krista A. Ehinger,et al.  Modelling search for people in 900 scenes: A combined source model of eye guidance , 2009 .

[49]  K. Cherry,et al.  Individual difference and contextual variables influence spatial memory in younger and older adults. , 1993, Psychology and aging.

[50]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  Examining eye movements in visual search through clusters of objects in a circular array , 2014, Journal of cognitive psychology.

[51]  J. Henderson Human gaze control during real-world scene perception , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.