Open-source image registration for MRI–TRUS fusion-guided prostate interventions

PurposeWe propose two software tools for non-rigid registration of MRI and transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) images of the prostate. Our ultimate goal is to develop an open-source solution to support MRI–TRUS fusion image guidance of prostate interventions, such as targeted biopsy for prostate cancer detection and focal therapy. It is widely hypothesized that image registration is an essential component in such systems.MethodsThe two non-rigid registration methods are: (1) a deformable registration of the prostate segmentation distance maps with B-spline regularization and (2) a finite element-based deformable registration of the segmentation surfaces in the presence of partial data. We evaluate the methods retrospectively using clinical patient image data collected during standard clinical procedures. Computation time and Target Registration Error (TRE) calculated at the expert-identified anatomical landmarks were used as quantitative measures for the evaluation.ResultsThe presented image registration tools were capable of completing deformable registration computation within 5 min. Average TRE was approximately 3 mm for both methods, which is comparable with the slice thickness in our MRI data. Both tools are available under nonrestrictive open-source license.ConclusionsWe release open-source tools that may be used for registration during MRI–TRUS-guided prostate interventions. Our tools implement novel registration approaches and produce acceptable registration results. We believe these tools will lower the barriers in development and deployment of interventional research solutions and facilitate comparison with similar tools.

[1]  Kemal Tuncali,et al.  Transperineal in-bore 3-T MR imaging-guided prostate biopsy: a prospective clinical observational study. , 2015, Radiology.

[2]  Aaron Fenster,et al.  Efficient Convex Optimization Approach to 3D Non-rigid MR-TRUS Registration , 2013, MICCAI.

[3]  Naira Muradyan,et al.  Prebiopsy magnetic resonance imaging and prostate cancer detection: comparison of random and targeted biopsies. , 2013, The Journal of urology.

[4]  H. Si,et al.  Adaptive tetrahedral mesh generation by constrained Delaunay refinement , 2008 .

[5]  Wendy L. Smith,et al.  Prostate volume contouring: a 3D analysis of segmentation using 3DTRUS, CT, and MR. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[6]  Luciant D. Wolfsberger,et al.  Variability in MRI vs. ultrasound measures of prostate volume and its impact on treatment recommendations for favorable-risk prostate cancer patients: a case series , 2014, Radiation oncology.

[7]  Calvin R. Maurer,et al.  A Linear Time Algorithm for Computing Exact Euclidean Distance Transforms of Binary Images in Arbitrary Dimensions , 2003, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[8]  Andras Lasso,et al.  PLUS: Open-Source Toolkit for Ultrasound-Guided Intervention Systems , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[9]  Aaron Fenster,et al.  Clinical application of a 3D ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy system. , 2011, Urologic oncology.

[10]  Stephan E Maier,et al.  Multiparametric MRI of prostate cancer: An update on state‐of‐the‐art techniques and their performance in detecting and localizing prostate cancer , 2013, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[11]  Nassir Navab,et al.  An Open Source Multimodal Image-Guided Prostate Biopsy Framework , 2014, CLIP@MICCAI.

[12]  T. Krouskop,et al.  Elastic Moduli of Breast and Prostate Tissues under Compression , 1998, Ultrasonic imaging.

[13]  Kemal Tuncali,et al.  Image registration for targeted MRI‐guided transperineal prostate biopsy , 2012, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[14]  Baris Turkbey,et al.  Current status of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasonography fusion software platforms for guidance of prostate biopsies , 2014, BJU international.

[15]  Andriy Myronenko,et al.  Point Set Registration: Coherent Point Drift , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[16]  Xavier Leroy,et al.  Prostate cancer diagnosis: multiparametric MR-targeted biopsy with cognitive and transrectal US-MR fusion guidance versus systematic biopsy--prospective multicenter study. , 2013, Radiology.

[17]  William M. Wells,et al.  Two solutions for registration of ultrasound to MRI for image-guided prostate interventions , 2012, 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[18]  I. Kaplan,et al.  Real time MRI-ultrasound image guided stereotactic prostate biopsy. , 2002, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[19]  Zeike A. Taylor,et al.  MR to ultrasound registration for image-guided prostate interventions , 2012, Medical Image Anal..

[20]  N. Dubrawsky Cancer statistics , 1989, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[21]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer statistics, 2013 , 2013, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[22]  Milan Sonka,et al.  3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network. , 2012, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[23]  Gabor Fichtinger,et al.  OpenIGTLink: an open network protocol for image‐guided therapy environment , 2009, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[24]  L. Kiemeney,et al.  Changes in prostate shape and volume and their implications for radiotherapy after introduction of endorectal balloon as determined by MRI at 3T. , 2009, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.