Refractory Sampling Links Efficiency and Costs of Sensory Encoding to Stimulus Statistics

Sensory neurons integrate information about the world, adapting their sampling to its changes. However, little is understood mechanistically how this primary encoding process, which ultimately limits perception, depends upon stimulus statistics. Here, we analyze this open question systematically by using intracellular recordings from fly (Drosophila melanogaster and Coenosia attenuata) photoreceptors and corresponding stochastic simulations from biophysically realistic photoreceptor models. Recordings show that photoreceptors can sample more information from naturalistic light intensity time series (NS) than from Gaussian white-noise (GWN), shuffled-NS or Gaussian-1/f stimuli; integrating larger responses with higher signal-to-noise ratio and encoding efficiency to large bursty contrast changes. Simulations reveal how a photoreceptor's information capture depends critically upon the stochastic refractoriness of its 30,000 sampling units (microvilli). In daylight, refractoriness sacrifices sensitivity to enhance intensity changes in neural image representations, with more and faster microvilli improving encoding. But for GWN and other stimuli, which lack longer dark contrasts of real-world intensity changes that reduce microvilli refractoriness, these performance gains are submaximal and energetically costly. These results provide mechanistic reasons why information sampling is more efficient for natural/naturalistic stimulation and novel insight into the operation, design, and evolution of signaling and code in sensory neurons.

[1]  Mikko Juusola,et al.  Compound eyes and retinal information processing in miniature dipteran species match their specific ecological demands , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  M Järvilehto,et al.  Contrast gain, signal-to-noise ratio, and linearity in light-adapted blowfly photoreceptors , 1994, The Journal of general physiology.

[3]  R. Frolov,et al.  Postembryonic Developmental Changes in Photoreceptors of the Stick Insect Carausius morosus Enhance the Shift to an Adult Nocturnal Life-Style , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  V. Hateren,et al.  Processing of natural time series of intensities in the early visual system of the blowfly , 1997 .

[5]  Matthew C Smear,et al.  Perception of sniff phase in mouse olfaction , 2011, Nature.

[6]  B W Knight,et al.  Adapting bump model for ventral photoreceptors of Limulus , 1982, The Journal of general physiology.

[7]  D J Field,et al.  Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[8]  C. Darwin Charles Darwin The Origin of Species by means of Natural Selection or The Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life , 2004 .

[9]  T. J. Wardill,et al.  Multiple Spectral Inputs Improve Motion Discrimination in the Drosophila Visual System , 2012, Science.

[10]  S. Grill,et al.  Photomechanical Responses in Drosophila Photoreceptors , 2012 .

[11]  H. P. Snippe,et al.  Phototransduction in primate cones and blowfly photoreceptors: different mechanisms, different algorithms, similar response , 2005, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[12]  D. G. Stavenga,et al.  Angular and spectral sensitivity of fly photoreceptors. III. Dependence on the pupil mechanism in the blowfly Calliphora , 2004, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[13]  N. Urban,et al.  Intrinsic biophysical diversity decorrelates neuronal firing while increasing information content , 2010, Nature Neuroscience.

[14]  B. Minke The History of the Prolonged Depolarizing Afterpotential (PDA) and Its Role in Genetic Dissection of Drosophila Phototransduction , 2012, Journal of neurogenetics.

[15]  Roger C. Hardie,et al.  Light Adaptation in Drosophila Photoreceptors: II. Rising Temperature Increases the Bandwidth of Reliable Signaling , 2001 .

[16]  J. H. van Hateren,et al.  A theory of maximizing sensory information , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[17]  James Theiler,et al.  Testing for nonlinearity in time series: the method of surrogate data , 1992 .

[18]  Roger C. Hardie,et al.  Light Adaptation in Drosophila Photoreceptors: I. Response Dynamics and Signaling Efficiency at 25°C , 2001 .

[19]  Roger C. Hardie,et al.  Feedback Network Controls Photoreceptor Output at the Layer of First Visual Synapses in Drosophila , 2006, The Journal of general physiology.

[20]  V. Hateren,et al.  Processing of natural time series of intensities by the visual system of the blowfly , 1997, Vision Research.

[21]  S. Benzer,et al.  Behavioral genetics of thermosensation and hygrosensation in Drosophila. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  S. Laughlin,et al.  Transducer noise in a photoreceptor , 1979, Nature.

[23]  Eng-Leng Mah,et al.  Photoreceptor processing improves salience facilitating small target detection in cluttered scenes. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[24]  S. Laughlin,et al.  Fly Photoreceptors Demonstrate Energy-Information Trade-Offs in Neural Coding , 2007, PLoS biology.

[25]  Mikko Vähäsöyrinki,et al.  Robustness of Neural Coding in Drosophila Photoreceptors in the Absence of Slow Delayed Rectifier K+ Channels , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  G D Lewen,et al.  Neural coding of naturalistic motion stimuli , 2001, Network.

[27]  Mikko Juusola,et al.  Visual Coding in Locust Photoreceptors , 2008, PloS one.

[28]  Mikko Juusola,et al.  Stimulus History Reliably Shapes Action Potential Waveforms of Cortical Neurons , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[29]  D. G. Stavenga,et al.  Spectral effects of the pupil in fly photoreceptors , 1982, Journal of comparative physiology.

[30]  Joseph J Atick,et al.  Could information theory provide an ecological theory of sensory processing? , 2011, Network.

[31]  Barbara Blakeslee,et al.  The intracellular pupil mechanism and photoreceptor signal: noise ratios in the fly Lucilia cuprina , 1987, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[32]  Gonzalo G. de Polavieja,et al.  The Rate of Information Transfer of Naturalistic Stimulation by Graded Potentials , 2003, The Journal of general physiology.

[33]  R. Hardie,et al.  Single photon responses in Drosophila photoreceptors and their regulation by Ca2+ , 2000, The Journal of physiology.

[34]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[35]  Aurel A. Lazar,et al.  Information representation with an ensemble of Hodgkin-Huxley neurons , 2007, Neurocomputing.

[36]  Rob R. de Ruyter van Steveninck,et al.  The metabolic cost of neural information , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[37]  Gordon L. Fain,et al.  Phototransduction and the Evolution of Photoreceptors , 2010, Current Biology.

[38]  Troy W. Margrie,et al.  A biophysical signature of network affiliation and sensory processing in mitral cells , 2012, Nature.

[39]  A. Martin Ion production in argon ion engine discharges , 1972 .

[40]  Gonzalo G de Polavieja Reliable biological communication with realistic constraints. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[41]  M. Juusola Linear and non-linear contrast coding in light-adapted blowfly photoreceptors , 1993, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[42]  Gonzalo G de Polavieja,et al.  Structure of deviations from optimality in biological systems , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[43]  Qasim Zaidi,et al.  Neuronal nonlinearity explains greater visual spatial resolution for darks than lights , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[44]  Zheng Lei Network adaptation improves temporal representation of naturalistic stimuli in Drosophila eye , 2009 .

[45]  Alexander Borst,et al.  ON and OFF pathways in Drosophila motion vision , 2010, Nature.

[46]  D Marr,et al.  Theory of edge detection , 1979, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[47]  Gonzalo G. de Polavieja,et al.  Network Adaptation Improves Temporal Representation of Naturalistic Stimuli in Drosophila Eye: I Dynamics , 2009, PloS one.

[48]  Simon B Laughlin,et al.  Neural images of pursuit targets in the photoreceptor arrays of male and female houseflies Musca domestica , 2003, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[49]  W. Bialek,et al.  Naturalistic stimuli increase the rate and efficiency of information transmission by primary auditory afferents , 1995, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[50]  F. Harris On the use of windows for harmonic analysis with the discrete Fourier transform , 1978, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[51]  J. H. Hateren,et al.  Information theoretical evaluation of parametric models of gain control in blowfly photoreceptor cells , 2001, Vision Research.

[52]  Matti Weckström,et al.  Large Functional Variability in Cockroach Photoreceptors: Optimization to Low Light Levels , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[53]  D. Stavenga,et al.  Insect pupil mechanisms , 1990, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[54]  K. Hamdorf,et al.  Microvillar components of light adaptation in blowflies , 1990, The Journal of general physiology.

[55]  Stephen A. Billings,et al.  Stochastic, Adaptive Sampling of Information by Microvilli in Fly Photoreceptors , 2012, Current Biology.

[56]  H. B. Barlow,et al.  Possible Principles Underlying the Transformations of Sensory Messages , 2012 .

[57]  Charles P. Ratliff,et al.  Retina is structured to process an excess of darkness in natural scenes , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.