Physics-based protein-structure prediction using a hierarchical protocol based on the UNRES force field: assessment in two blind tests.

Recent improvements in the protein-structure prediction method developed in our laboratory, based on the thermodynamic hypothesis, are described. The conformational space is searched extensively at the united-residue level by using our physics-based UNRES energy function and the conformational space annealing method of global optimization. The lowest-energy coarse-grained structures are then converted to an all-atom representation and energy-minimized with the ECEPP/3 force field. The procedure was assessed in two recent blind tests of protein-structure prediction. During the first blind test, we predicted large fragments of alpha and alpha+beta proteins [60-70 residues with C(alpha) rms deviation (rmsd) <6 A]. However, for alpha+beta proteins, significant topological errors occurred despite low rmsd values. In the second exercise, we predicted whole structures of five proteins (two alpha and three alpha+beta, with sizes of 53-235 residues) with remarkably good accuracy. In particular, for the genomic target TM0487 (a 102-residue alpha+beta protein from Thermotoga maritima), we predicted the complete, topologically correct structure with 7.3-A C(alpha) rmsd. So far this protein is the largest alpha+beta protein predicted based solely on the amino acid sequence and a physics-based potential-energy function and search procedure. For target T0198, a phosphate transport system regulator PhoU from T. maritima (a 235-residue mainly alpha-helical protein), we predicted the topology of the whole six-helix bundle correctly within 8 A rmsd, except the 32 C-terminal residues, most of which form a beta-hairpin. These and other examples described in this work demonstrate significant progress in physics-based protein-structure prediction.

[1]  R. Kubo.  GENERALIZED CUMULANT EXPANSION METHOD , 1962 .

[2]  C. Anfinsen.  Principles that govern the folding of protein chains. , 1973, Science.

[3]  S. Rackovsky,et al.  Calculation of protein backbone geometry from α‐carbon coordinates based on peptide‐group dipole alignment , 1993, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[4]  Manfred J. Sippl,et al.  Boltzmann's principle, knowledge-based mean fields and protein folding. An approach to the computational determination of protein structures , 1993, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[5]  H. Scheraga,et al.  Energy parameters in polypeptides. 10. Improved geometrical parameters and nonbonded interactions for use in the ECEPP/3 algorithm, with application to proline-containing peptides , 1994 .

[6]  D Fischer,et al.  Assigning amino acid sequences to 3‐dimensional protein folds , 1996, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[7]  A. Liwo,et al.  A united‐residue force field for off‐lattice protein‐structure simulations. I. Functional forms and parameters of long‐range side‐chain interaction potentials from protein crystal data , 1997 .

[8]  A. Liwo,et al.  A united‐residue force field for off‐lattice protein‐structure simulations. II. Parameterization of short‐range interactions and determination of weights of energy terms by Z‐score optimization , 1997 .

[9]  A. Liwo,et al.  United‐residue force field for off‐lattice protein‐structure simulations: III. Origin of backbone hydrogen‐bonding cooperativity in united‐residue potentials , 1998 .

[10]  S. Rackovsky,et al.  Conformational analysis of the 20-residue membrane-bound portion of melittin by conformational space annealing. , 1998, Biopolymers.

[11]  Ram Samudrala,et al.  Ab initio protein structure prediction using a combined hierarchical approach , 1999, Proteins.

[12]  A. Liwo,et al.  Calculation of protein conformation by global optimization of a potential energy function , 1999, Proteins.

[13]  A. Liwo,et al.  Protein structure prediction by global optimization of a potential energy function. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  A. Liwo,et al.  Energy-based de novo protein folding by conformational space annealing and an off-lattice united-residue force field: application to the 10-55 fragment of staphylococcal protein A and to apo calbindin D9K. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  C Venclovas,et al.  Processing and analysis of CASP3 protein structure predictions , 1999, Proteins.

[16]  T. N. Bhat,et al.  The Protein Data Bank , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..

[17]  김삼묘,et al.  “Bioinformatics” 특집을 내면서 , 2000 .

[18]  Liam J. McGuffin,et al.  The PSIPRED protein structure prediction server , 2000, Bioinform..

[19]  A. Liwo,et al.  Cumulant-based expressions for the multibody terms for the correlation between local and electrostatic interactions in the united-residue force field , 2001 .

[20]  H. Scheraga,et al.  Optimization of Parameters in Macromolecular Potential Energy Functions by Conformational Space Annealing , 2001 .

[21]  Adam Liwo,et al.  Development of Physics-Based Energy Functions that Predict Medium-Resolution Structures for Proteins of the α, β, and α/β Structural Classes , 2001 .

[22]  Adam Liwo,et al.  Recent improvements in prediction of protein structure by global optimization of a potential energy function , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  Adam Liwo,et al.  Energy‐based reconstruction of a protein backbone from its α‐carbon trace by a Monte‐Carlo method , 2002, J. Comput. Chem..

[24]  A. Liwo,et al.  A method for optimizing potential-energy functions by a hierarchical design of the potential-energy landscape: Application to the UNRES force field , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  Adam Liwo,et al.  Evolution of physics‐based methodology for exploring the conformational energy landscape of proteins , 2002, J. Comput. Chem..

[26]  Zaida Luthey-Schulten,et al.  Folding funnels: The key to robust protein structure prediction , 2002, J. Comput. Chem..

[27]  K. Ginalski,et al.  Protein structure prediction of CASP5 comparative modeling and fold recognition targets using consensus alignment approach and 3D assessment , 2003, Proteins.

[28]  A. Liwo,et al.  Addition of side chains to a known backbone with defined side-chain centroids. , 2002, Biophysical chemistry.

[29]  Marcin Feder,et al.  A “FRankenstein's monster” approach to comparative modeling: Merging the finest fragments of Fold‐Recognition models and iterative model refinement aided by 3D structure evaluation , 2003, Proteins.

[30]  Adam Liwo,et al.  Molecular Simulation Study of the Potentials of Mean Force for the Interactions between Models of Like-Charged and between Charged and Nonpolar Amino Acid Side Chains in Water , 2003 .

[31]  A. Liwo,et al.  Molecular simulation study of cooperativity in hydrophobic association: clusters of four hydrophobic particles. , 2003, Biophysical chemistry.

[32]  Daisuke Kihara,et al.  TOUCHSTONE: A unified approach to protein structure prediction , 2003, Proteins.

[33]  H. Scheraga,et al.  Packing helices in proteins by global optimization of a potential energy function , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[34]  Adam Liwo,et al.  Determination of the Potentials of Mean Force for Rotation about Cα−Cα Virtual Bonds in Polypeptides from the ab Initio Energy Surfaces of Terminally Blocked Glycine, Alanine, and Proline† , 2003 .

[35]  Adam Liwo,et al.  Improved conformational space annealing method to treat β-structure with the UNRES force-field and to enhance scalability of parallel implementation , 2004 .

[36]  A. Liwo,et al.  Parametrization of Backbone−Electrostatic and Multibody Contributions to the UNRES Force Field for Protein-Structure Prediction from Ab Initio Energy Surfaces of Model Systems† , 2004 .

[37]  Adam Liwo,et al.  Optimization of the UNRES Force Field by Hierarchical Design of the Potential-Energy Landscape. 2. Off-Lattice Tests of the Method with Single Proteins , 2004 .

[38]  A. Liwo,et al.  Optimization of the UNRES Force Field by Hierarchical Design of the Potential-Energy Landscape. 3. Use of Many Proteins in Optimization , 2004 .

[39]  Adam Liwo,et al.  Prediction of the structures of proteins with the UNRES force field, including dynamic formation and breaking of disulfide bonds. , 2004, Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS.

[40]  Adam Liwo,et al.  Optimization of the UNRES Force Field by Hierarchical Design of the Potential-Energy Landscape. 1. Tests of the Approach Using Simple Lattice Protein Models , 2004 .

[41]  A. Liwo,et al.  Ab initio simulations of protein-folding pathways by molecular dynamics with the united-residue model of polypeptide chains. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.