Optimized model of oriented-line-target detection using vertical and horizontal filters.

A line-element target differing sufficiently in orientation from a background of line elements can be visually detected easily and quickly; orientation thresholds for such detection are lowest when the background elements are all vertical or all horizontal. A simple quantitative model of this performance was constructed from three processing stages: (1) linear filtering by two classes of anisotropic filters, (2) nonlinear point transformation, and (3) estimation of a signal-to-noise ratio based on responses to images with and without a target. A Monte Carlo optimization procedure (simulated annealing) was used to determine the model parameter values required for providing an accurate description of psychophysical data on orientation increment thresholds.

[1]  D. G. Albrecht,et al.  Spatial frequency selectivity of cells in macaque visual cortex , 1982, Vision Research.

[2]  R. L. Valois,et al.  The orientation and direction selectivity of cells in macaque visual cortex , 1982, Vision Research.

[3]  A. Treisman Preattentive processing in vision , 1985, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[4]  I. Introduction Nonlinear Operators for Improving Texture Segmentation Based on Features Extracted by Spatial Filtering , 1990 .

[5]  C Marendaz,et al.  Effect of gravitational cues on visual search for orientation. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[7]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Visual search for oriented lines: the role of angular relations between targets and distractors. , 1992, Spatial vision.

[8]  R A Young,et al.  The Gaussian derivative model for spatial vision: I. Retinal mechanisms. , 1988, Spatial vision.

[9]  P Perona,et al.  Preattentive texture discrimination with early vision mechanisms. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[10]  S P McKee,et al.  Interference with line-orientation sensitivity. , 1976, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[11]  James R. Bergen,et al.  Parallel versus serial processing in rapid pattern discrimination , 1983, Nature.

[12]  R. Baddeley,et al.  A statistical analysis of natural images matches psychophysically derived orientation tuning curves , 1991, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[13]  D. Regan,et al.  Postadaptation orientation discrimination. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[14]  H. Nothdurft Feature analysis and the role of similarity in preattentive vision , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[15]  D. Foster,et al.  Horizontal—vertical filters in early vision predict anomalous line-orientation identification frequencies , 1991, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[16]  K. Ruddock,et al.  Effects of stimulus complexity on simple spatial discriminations. , 1990, Spatial vision.

[17]  B Julesz,et al.  "Where" and "what" in vision. , 1985, Science.

[18]  J. Beck,et al.  Discriminability of differences in line slope and in line arrangement as a function of mask delay , 1972 .

[19]  J. Wolfe,et al.  The role of categorization in visual search for orientation. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  J. Beck,et al.  The effects of concentrated and distributed attention on peripheral acuity , 1973 .

[21]  P. Schiller,et al.  Quantitative studies of single-cell properties in monkey striate cortex. II. Orientation specificity and ocular dominance. , 1976, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  Bruce E. Rosen,et al.  Genetic Algorithms and Very Fast Simulated Reannealing: A comparison , 1992 .

[23]  William H. Press,et al.  Simulated Annealing Optimization over Continuous Spaces , 1991 .

[24]  D. Foster,et al.  Asymmetries in oriented-line detection indicate two orthogonal filters in early vision , 1991, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[25]  B. S. Rubenstein,et al.  Spatial variability as a limiting factor in texture-discrimination tasks: implications for performance asymmetries. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[26]  Michael Bach,et al.  Asymmetries in preattentive line detection , 1994, Vision Research.

[27]  A Javadnia,et al.  The limits of parallel processing in the visual discrimination of orientation and magnification. , 1988, Spatial vision.