Effects of matrix composition and configuration on forest bird movements in a fragmented Afromontane biodiversity hot spot

Persistence of forest-dependent species in fragmented landscapes strongly relies on sufficient dispersal between patches, making it important to understand how animal movements are affected by the intervening matrix. Movements can be influenced through selection or avoidance of land cover based on their perceived suitability for foraging or providing cover. The composition and configuration of the matrix will, therefore, most likely be an important factor to consider when estimating connectivity between patches. To address this, we performed translocation experiments to understand how forest birds used different land cover types in a fine-grained matrix of a fragmented Afromontane biodiversity hotspot (Taita Hills, Kenya). Our results revealed that use of land cover types for both the forest specialist Cabanis’s greenbul Phyllastrephus cabanisi and for the forest generalist white-starred robin Pogonocichla stellata was disproportional to their availability. However, this effect was influenced by matrix configuration; in patchy matrices, land cover selection was more pronounced compared with more uniform matrices, especially for the forest specialist. At the scale of movement steps, risk avoidance seemed to be a strong factor in the route decisions for both species. Observed steps contained on average lower proportions of open land cover and did less frequently intersect built-up areas than expected. P. stellata did not differentiate between the alternative land cover types, whereas P. cabanisi preferred steps that contained more indigenous forest. The observed negative relationship between degree of forest dependency and matrix permeability implies that for members of the Taita bird community, which are even more dependent on intact forest habitat (i.e. the critically endangered Taita thrush Turdus helleri), current permeability of the matrix may be even lower. Matrix restoration to improve connectivity may, therefore, be a crucial instrument for the long-term survival of forest-dependent species in these fragmented Afromontane landscapes.

[1]  C. C. Clair,et al.  Factors affecting the permeability of transportation and riparian corridors to the movements of songbirds in an urban landscape , 2009 .

[2]  Luc Lens,et al.  Airborne remote sensing of spatiotemporal change (1955-2004) in indigenous and exotic forest cover in the Taita Hills, Kenya , 2009, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[3]  A. Balmford,et al.  Reconciling Food Production and Biodiversity Conservation: Land Sharing and Land Sparing Compared , 2011, Science.

[4]  N. Burgess,et al.  Conservation implications of deforestation across an elevational gradient in the Eastern Arc Mountains, Tanzania , 2009 .

[5]  David V. Fairclough,et al.  Choerodon schoenleinii. In: IUCN 2011. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2011.2 , 2004 .

[6]  J M J Travis,et al.  Risky movement increases the rate of range expansion , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[7]  L. Lens,et al.  Using science to guide conservation: From landscape modelling to increased connectivity in the Taita Hills, SE Kenya , 2011 .

[8]  L. Fahrig,et al.  Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure , 1993 .

[9]  Luc Lens,et al.  Ranging behaviour and habitat use by an Afrotropical songbird in a fragmented landscape , 2007 .

[10]  P. Stouffer,et al.  Use of Amazonian Forest Fragments by Understory Insectivorous Birds , 1995 .

[11]  Peter P. Marra,et al.  Matrix mediates avian movements in tropical forested landscapes: Inference from experimental translocations , 2010 .

[12]  A. Estrada,et al.  Anthropogenic landscape changes and avian diversity at Los Tuxtlas, Mexico , 2004, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[13]  E. K. Urban,et al.  The Birds of Africa , 1982 .

[14]  B. Manly,et al.  Resource selection by animals: statistical design and analysis for field studies. , 1994 .

[15]  R. L..  The Birds of Africa , 1900, Nature.

[16]  M. Fortin,et al.  INFLUENCE OF FOREST COVER ON THE MOVEMENTS OF FOREST BIRDS: A HOMING EXPERIMENT , 2001 .

[17]  Luc Lens,et al.  Fluctuating asymmetry increases with habitat disturbance in seven bird species of a fragmented afrotropical forest , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[18]  M. Villard,et al.  Permeability of three boreal forest landscape types to bird movements as determined from experimental translocations , 2002 .

[19]  W. Newmark.  Tropical forest fragmentation and the local extinction of understory birds in the eastern Usambara Mountains, Tanzania , 1991 .

[20]  Jean Paul Metzger,et al.  Using gap‐crossing capacity to evaluate functional connectivity of two Atlantic rainforest birds and their response to fragmentation , 2008 .

[21]  Adam S Hadley,et al.  Tropical deforestation alters hummingbird movement patterns , 2009, Biology Letters.

[22]  Marc Bélisle,et al.  MEASURING LANDSCAPE CONNECTIVITY: THE CHALLENGE OF BEHAVIORAL LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY , 2005 .

[23]  S. L. Lima,et al.  SEARCH STRATEGIES FOR LANDSCAPE‐LEVEL INTERPATCH MOVEMENTS , 1999 .

[24]  Neil D. Burgess,et al.  Correlations among species distributions, human density and human infrastructure across the high biodiversity tropical mountains of Africa , 2007 .

[25]  Colleen Cassady St. Clair,et al.  Functional responses in habitat selection by tropical birds moving through fragmented forest. , 2010 .

[26]  María del Mar Delgado,et al.  Changes of movement patterns from early dispersal to settlement , 2009, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[27]  Cameron S Gillies,et al.  Riparian corridors enhance movement of a forest specialist bird in fragmented tropical forest , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  K. Barton.  MuMIn : multi-model inference, R package version 0.12.0 , 2009 .

[29]  C. Peres,et al.  Avian life‐history determinants of local extinction risk in a hyper‐fragmented neotropical forest landscape , 2008 .

[30]  N. D. Burgessa,et al.  The biological importance of the Eastern Arc Mountains of Tanzania and Kenya , 2006 .

[31]  Kathryn E Sieving,et al.  An Experimental Test of Matrix Permeability and Corridor Use by an Endemic Understory Bird , 2006, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[32]  R. Mittermeier,et al.  Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities , 2000, Nature.

[33]  W. Newmark,et al.  Ranging behavior and habitat selection of terrestrial insectivorous birds in north‐east Tanzania: implications for corridor design in the Eastern Arc Mountains , 2010 .

[34]  K. E. Hodges,et al.  Effect of habitat area and isolation on fragmented animal populations , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  Benjamin M Bolker,et al.  Effects of Landscape Corridors on Seed Dispersal by Birds , 2005, Science.

[36]  J. Ragle,et al.  IUCN Red List of Threatened Species , 2010 .

[37]  Luc Lens,et al.  Avian Persistence in Fragmented Rainforest , 2002, Science.

[38]  Lenore Fahrig,et al.  Connectivity Conservation: Landscape connectivity: a return to the basics , 2006 .

[39]  Luc Lens,et al.  Genetic signature of population fragmentation varies with mobility in seven bird species of a fragmented Kenyan cloud forest , 2011, Molecular ecology.

[40]  C. Peres,et al.  Rapid avifaunal collapse along the Amazonian deforestation frontier , 2006 .

[41]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[42]  D. Edwards,et al.  Wildlife‐friendly oil palm plantations fail to protect biodiversity effectively , 2010 .

[43]  C. Bradshaw,et al.  Primary forests are irreplaceable for sustaining tropical biodiversity , 2011, Nature.

[44]  P. Pellikka,et al.  Modelling agricultural expansion in Kenya's Eastern Arc Mountains biodiversity hotspot. , 2010 .

[45]  Cameron S Gillies,et al.  Fine-scale movement decisions of tropical forest birds in a fragmented landscape. , 2011, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.