Electricity Market Monitoring and the Economics of Regulation

Restructuring of wholesale electricity markets in the U.S. has brought new institutions known as Regional Transmission Organizations (RTO) and Market Monitoring Institutions (MMI) that oversee competition in the energy markets that they operate. Both regulators and external observers have viewed MMIs as impartial observers intended to police these exchanges against the exercise of market power. The economics of regulation generally questions (but does not always reject) public interest interpretations on grounds that interest groups use politics and regulatory procedure to shape institutions to their advantage. MMIs in fact originated as a strategic move by California’s large utilities in connection with that state’s restructuring, intended to advantage them against competitors. The responses of MMIs to the economically efficient practice of “virtual bidding” in RTOs differed with the relative strengths of different interests in the governance of those organizations. As policy, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission should re-examine its endorsement of MMIs and consider centralizing their functions.

[1]  P. Joskow Markets for Power in the United States: An Interim Assessment , 2005 .

[2]  W. Emmons Implications of Ownership, Regulation, and Market Structure for Performance: Evidence from the U.S. Electric Utility Industry Before and After the New Deal , 1997, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[3]  Christopher R. Knittel,et al.  The Adoption of State Electricity Regulation: The Role of Interest Groups , 2006 .

[4]  J. Stiglitz,et al.  The Architecture of Economic Systems: Hierarchies and Polyarchies , 1984 .

[5]  Christopher R. Knittel,et al.  Inefficiencies and Market Power in Financial Arbitrage: A Study of California's Electricity Markets , 2004 .

[6]  P. Fox-Penner,et al.  Competition in Wholesale Electric Power Markets , 2002 .

[7]  Guy L. F. Holburn,et al.  Interest Group Representation in Administrative Institutions: The Impact of Consumer Advocates and Elected Commissioners on Regulatory Policy in the United States , 2002 .

[8]  P. Joskow,et al.  Political Constraints on Executive Compensation: Evidence from the Electric Utility Industry , 1994 .

[9]  James Barker,et al.  Governance and Regulation of Power Pools and System Operators: An International Comparison , 1997 .

[10]  John Maurice Clark,et al.  Toward a concept of workable competition , 1940 .

[11]  Walter Surratt The Analytical Approach to Measuring Horizontal Market Power in Electric Utility Markets: A Historical Perspective , 1998 .

[12]  Robert B. Wilson,et al.  Research Paper Series Graduate School of Business Stanford University Architecture of Power Markets Architecture of Power Markets 1 , 2022 .

[13]  G. Jarrell The Demand for State Regulation of the Electric Utility Industry , 1978, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[14]  W. Hogan Contract networks for electric power transmission , 1992 .

[15]  Robert J. Michaels,et al.  Games or Opportunities: Bidding in the California Markets , 2001 .

[16]  S. Borenstein,et al.  Measuring Market Inefficiencies in California's Restructured Wholesale Electricity Market , 2002 .

[17]  W. Primeaux,et al.  Regulator Selection Methods and Electricity Prices , 1986 .

[18]  G. Stigler The Theory of Economic Regulation , 2021, The Political Economy.

[19]  Catherine D. Wolfram,et al.  Measuring Duopoly Power in the British Electricity Spot Market , 1999 .

[20]  S. Peltzman Toward a More General Theory of Regulation , 1976, The Journal of Law and Economics.