Iso-orientation areas in the foveal cone mosaic

The quality of the foveal cone mosaic in human and primate retinas is a basic parameter of spatial vision function. The present study uses digital-texture analysis procedures to analyze the crystalline order of inner segment sections containing the rod-free portions of foveal cone mosaics. Definition of the cone cross-sectional centers made possible by adequate preprocessing allows precise mapping of lattice vertices and differentiation of hexagonal positions by procedures for direct neighbor recognition. In a further step, the existence of subunits within the hexagonal areas is revealed by the determination of axial orientation. The lattice of the subunits is characterized by similar orientation and high positional correlation of its hexagonal units. The axial orientation of the areas differs from that of neighboring subunits by angular shifts of 10-15 deg and linear series of nonhexagonal irregularities demarcate the borders. Although larger patches with continuous hexagonal order occur in the surrounding rod-free regions, elevated degrees of disorder (30%) are found within the foveolar center (ca. 300 cones). Analysis of a mosaic showing labeled B cones (Szél et al., 1988) demonstrates that lattice disorder is in part associated with the blue cone subpopulation. The foveal mosaic from a glaucomatuous eye reveals severe lattice degradation throughout the rod-free zone, presumably due to extensive receptor loss. The low-frequency superstructure results in local sets of sampling grids (5'-8') with differing orientational bias. Besides a horizontal/vertical difference of mosaic compression (ca. 1:1.15), the present analysis gives no hints for the existence of systematic meridional anisotropies at the receptor mosaic level. The study reveals a discontinuous organization of the foveal mosaic and points to possible sources for the induction and location of lattice disorder.

[1]  S. Schein,et al.  Density profile of blue-sensitive cones along the horizontal meridian of macaque retina. , 1985, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[2]  J. Provis,et al.  Development of the human retina: Patterns of cell distribution and redistribution in the ganglion cell layer , 1985, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[3]  D. W. Heeley,et al.  Spatial frequency discrimination at different orientations , 1989, Vision Research.

[4]  A. Cowey,et al.  The lengths of thefibres of henle in the retina of macaque monkeys: Implications for vision , 1988, Neuroscience.

[5]  Á. Szél,et al.  Identification of the blue‐sensitive cones in the mammalian retina by anti‐visual pigment antibody , 1988, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[6]  A J Ahumada,et al.  Cone sampling array models. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[7]  A. Cowey,et al.  The ganglion cell and cone distributions in the monkey's retina: Implications for central magnification factors , 1985, Vision Research.

[8]  W. H. Miller,et al.  Does cone positional disorder limit resolution? , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[9]  J. Hirsch,et al.  Quality of the primate photoreceptor lattice and limits of spatial vision , 1984, Vision Research.

[10]  A. Hendrickson,et al.  Photoreceptor topography of the retina in the adult pigtail macaque (Macaca nemestrina) , 1989, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[11]  Christine A. Curcio,et al.  The spatial resolution capacity of human foveal retina , 1989, Vision Research.

[12]  R. Marc,et al.  Chromatic organization of primate cones. , 1977, Science.

[13]  Gerald Westheimer,et al.  Optical Properties of Vertebrate Eyes , 1972 .

[14]  J. Yellott Spectral consequences of photoreceptor sampling in the rhesus retina. , 1983, Science.

[15]  W S Geisler,et al.  Physical limits of acuity and hyperacuity. , 1984, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[16]  David Williams Aliasing in human foveal vision , 1985, Vision Research.

[17]  T. R. J. Bossomaier,et al.  Irregularity and aliasing: Solution? , 1985, Vision Research.

[18]  N J Coletta,et al.  Psychophysical estimate of extrafoveal cone spacing. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[19]  P K Ahnelt,et al.  Identification of a subtype of cone photoreceptor, likely to be blue sensitive, in the human retina , 1987, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[20]  A. Hendrickson,et al.  The morphological development of the human fovea. , 1984, Ophthalmology.

[21]  A. Hendrickson,et al.  Distribution of cones in human and monkey retina: individual variability and radial asymmetry. , 1987, Science.

[22]  D. Williams,et al.  Cone spacing and the visual resolution limit. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[23]  David Williams Topography of the foveal cone mosaic in the living human eye , 1988, Vision Research.

[24]  J. Yellott Spectral analysis of spatial sampling by photoreceptors: Topological disorder prevents aliasing , 1982, Vision Research.

[25]  J M Enoch,et al.  Optical modulation by the isolated retina and retinal receptors. , 1972, Vision research.

[26]  David R. Williams,et al.  Seeing through the photoreceptor mosaic , 1986, Trends in Neurosciences.

[27]  Gary D. Bernard,et al.  Averaging over the foveal receptor aperture curtails aliasing , 1983, Vision Research.

[28]  J. Hirsch,et al.  Orientation dependence of visual hyperacuity contains a component with hexagonal symmetry. , 1984, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[29]  F. Blodi Eugene Wolff's Anatomy of the Eye and Orbit , 1977 .