Assessing Stalking Behaviors in a Control Balance Theory Framework

Tittle’s control balance theory is a modern exemplar of theoretical integration premised on the ratio of perceived control exerted versus control subjected, which predicts the probability of deviant acts. Although the theory offers promise for contextualizing both perpetration and victimization, relatively few empirical tests have been conducted to date. This study describes stalking as a crime representing a unique manifestation of power dynamics and perceived control imbalances for both offenders and victims. Using a large college student sample, we assess the empirical associations between control balance and stalking perpetration and victimization outcomes, including gender-specific models, featuring several different operationalizations of the control balance ratio. Results suggest partial support for the theory, demonstrating that control surpluses are associated with stalking perpetration among men, while control deficits are associated with stalking perpetration and victimization among women, net of controls. Implications for control balance theory and stalking research are discussed.

[1]  Matt R. Nobles,et al.  Protection Against Pursuit: A Conceptual and Empirical Comparison of Cyberstalking and Stalking Victimization Among a National Sample , 2014 .

[2]  Jeffrey A. Bouffard,et al.  Non-Response Bias with a Web-Based Survey of College Students: Differences from a Classroom Survey About Carrying Concealed Handguns , 2012 .

[3]  Mick P. Couper,et al.  The Future of Modes of Data Collection , 2011 .

[4]  Cortney A. Franklin An Investigation of the Relationship between Self-Control and Alcohol-Induced Sexual Assault Victimization , 2011 .

[5]  Matt R. Nobles,et al.  Method behind the madness: An examination of stalking measurements , 2011 .

[6]  Ronald L. Akers,et al.  Is stalking a learned phenomenon? An empirical test of social learning theory , 2011 .

[7]  Fawn T. Ngo,et al.  Cybercrime Victimization: An Examination of Individual and Situational Level Factors , 2011 .

[8]  Matt R. Nobles,et al.  Look who's stalking: Obsessive pursuit and attachment theory , 2010 .

[9]  Matt R. Nobles,et al.  Career Dimensions of Stalking Victimization and Perpetration , 2009 .

[10]  Angela R. Gover,et al.  The Effects of Low Self-Control and Childhood Maltreatment on Stalking Victimization among Men and Women , 2009 .

[11]  Michael D. Reisig,et al.  Perceived Risk of Internet Theft Victimization , 2009 .

[12]  Heith Copes,et al.  Self-Control, Prison Victimization, and Prison Infractions , 2009 .

[13]  M. Rand,et al.  National Crime Victimization Survey: Stalking Victimization in the United States , 2009 .

[14]  Brian K. Payne,et al.  Using Student Samples in Criminological Research , 2008 .

[15]  Xiaohe Xu,et al.  Self-Control, Intimate Partner Abuse, and Intimate Partner Victimization: Testing the General Theory of Crime in Thailand , 2008 .

[16]  Michael D. Reisig,et al.  LOW SELF‐CONTROL, ROUTINE ACTIVITIES, AND FRAUD VICTIMIZATION* , 2008 .

[17]  P. Chisnall Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method , 2007, Journal of Advertising Research.

[18]  Stephen W. Baron,et al.  Street Youth Crime: A Test of Control Balance Theory , 2007 .

[19]  Bonnie S. Fisher,et al.  Self-control, Victimization, and their Influence on Risky Lifestyles: A Longitudinal Analysis Using Panel Data , 2006 .

[20]  Alex R. Piquero,et al.  Control balance and exploitative corporate crime , 2006 .

[21]  Andrea D Finney Domestic violence, sexual assault and stalking: Findings from the 2004/05 British Crime Survey: (634612007-001) , 2006 .

[22]  George E. Higgins,et al.  Control Balance Theory and Violence: An Examination of Contingencies , 2005 .

[23]  Theodore R. Curry Integrating Motivating and Constraining Forces in Deviance Causation: A Test of Causal Chain Hypotheses in Control Balance Theory , 2005 .

[24]  A. Piquero,et al.  Self-Control, Violent Offending, and Homicide Victimization: Assessing the General Theory of Crime , 2005 .

[25]  A. Piquero,et al.  Self-Control, Violent Offending, and Homicide Victimization , 2005 .

[26]  Emma Tonin The attachment styles of stalkers , 2004 .

[27]  Charles R. Tittle,et al.  Refining control balance theory , 2004 .

[28]  George E. Higgins,et al.  Control balance theory and exploitation: an examination of contingencies , 2004 .

[29]  Michael D. Kaplowitz,et al.  A Comparison of Web and Mail Survey Response Rates , 2004 .

[30]  Kirk W. Elifson,et al.  Integrating the general theory of crime into an explanation of violent victimization among female offenders , 2004 .

[31]  L. Sculthorpe Victims of Stalking , 2004 .

[32]  A. Piquero,et al.  Control Ratios and Defiant Acts of Deviance: Assessing Additive and Conditional Effects with Constraints and Impulsivity , 2003 .

[33]  Alex R. Piquero,et al.  Extending Tittle's Control Balance Theory to Account for Victimization , 2003 .

[34]  J. J. Haugaard,et al.  Stalking and Other Forms of Intrusive Contact After the Dissolution of Adolescent Dating or Romantic Relationships , 2003, Violence and Victims.

[35]  Keith E. Davis,et al.  Stalking and Psychological Abuse: Common Factors and Relationship-Specific Characteristics , 2003, Violence and Victims.

[36]  Francis T. Cullen,et al.  BEING PURSUED: STALKING VICTIMIZATION IN A NATIONAL STUDY OF COLLEGE WOMEN* , 2002 .

[37]  Richard A. Wright,et al.  A study of individual and situational antecedents of violent victimization , 2002 .

[38]  Andy Hochstetler,et al.  An exploratory assessment of tittle's control balance theory: Results from the national youth survey , 2002 .

[39]  Alex R. Piquero,et al.  Applying Tittle’s control balance theory to police deviance , 2001 .

[40]  Alex R. Piquero,et al.  Applying Rasch modeling to the validity of a control balance scale , 2001 .

[41]  Matthew Hickman, Alex Piquero exploring the relationships between gender, control balance, and deviance , 2001 .

[42]  W. Fremouw,et al.  An investigation of the psychological characteristics of stalkers: empathy, problem-solving, attachment and borderline personality features. , 2001, Journal of forensic sciences.

[43]  Nancy Thoennes,et al.  Extent, nature, and consequences of intimate partner violence , 2000 .

[44]  M. Couper A REVIEW OF ISSUES AND APPROACHES , 2000 .

[45]  B Bjerregaard,et al.  An Empirical Study of Stalking Victimization , 2000, Violence and Victims.

[46]  C. Leukefeld,et al.  Stalking as a Variant of Intimate Violence: Implications From a Young Adult Sample , 2000, Violence and Victims.

[47]  Russell E. Palarea,et al.  Breaking Up is Hard To Do: Unwanted Pursuit Behaviors Following the Dissolution of a Romantic Relationship , 2000, Violence and Victims.

[48]  K. Davis,et al.  Stalking Perpetrators and Psychological Maltreatment of Partners: Anger-Jealousy, Attachment Insecurity, Need for Control, and Break-Up Context , 2000, Violence and Victims.

[49]  P. Tjaden,et al.  Extent, nature, and consequences of intimate partner violence , 2000 .

[50]  Jan M. Chaiken,et al.  The Sexual Victimization of College Women , 2000 .

[51]  Christopher J. Schreck Criminal victimization and low self-control: An extension and test of a general theory of crime , 1999 .

[52]  C. R. Tittle,et al.  Continuing the Discussion of Control Balance , 1999 .

[53]  Alex R. Piquero,et al.  AN EMPIRICAL TEST OF TITTLE'S CONTROL BALANCE THEORY* , 1999 .

[54]  Richard Tewksbury,et al.  A Routine Activity Theory Explanation for Women's Stalking Victimizations , 1999, Violence against Women.

[55]  K. Sheehan Response Variation in E-Mail Surveys: An Exploration , 1999 .

[56]  Nancy Thoennes,et al.  Stalking in America : findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey , 1998 .

[57]  J R Meloy,et al.  A comparative study of psychotic and nonpsychotic stalking. , 1997, The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.

[58]  W. Fremouw,et al.  Stalking on campus: the prevalence and strategies for coping with stalking. , 1997, Journal of forensic sciences.

[59]  Charles R. Tittle Thoughts Stimulated by Braithwaite's Analysis of Control Balance Theory , 1997 .

[60]  J. Braithwaite Charles Tittle's Control Balance and Criminological Theory , 1997 .

[61]  P E Mullen,et al.  The impact of stalkers on their victims , 1997, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[62]  Brent G. Dennis,et al.  Sex-Related Offenses and Fear of Crime on Campus , 1996 .

[63]  Ngaire Naffine,et al.  Feminism and criminology , 1996 .

[64]  Harold G. Grasmick,et al.  Testing the Core Empirical Implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi's General Theory of Crime , 1993 .

[65]  佐竹 元一郎,et al.  Applied Linear Statistical Models--Regression,Analysis of Variance,and Experimental Designs 3rd ed./John Neter et al.(1990) , 1991 .

[66]  D. Dillman The Design and Administration of Mail Surveys , 1991 .

[67]  M. Krohn,et al.  Theoretical Integration in the Study of Deviance and Crime: Problems and Prospects. , 1990 .