Minimum 0-extension problems on directed metrics

For a metric $\mu$ on a finite set $T$, the minimum 0-extension problem 0-Ext$[\mu]$ is defined as follows: Given $V\supseteq T$ and $\ c:{V \choose 2}\rightarrow \mathbf{Q_+}$, minimize $\sum c(xy)\mu(\gamma(x),\gamma(y))$ subject to $\gamma:V\rightarrow T,\ \gamma(t)=t\ (\forall t\in T)$, where the sum is taken over all unordered pairs in $V$. This problem generalizes several classical combinatorial optimization problems such as the minimum cut problem or the multiterminal cut problem. The complexity dichotomy of 0-Ext$[\mu]$ was established by Karzanov and Hirai, which is viewed as a manifestation of the dichotomy theorem for finite-valued CSPs due to Thapper and Živný. In this paper, we consider a directed version $\overrightarrow{0}$-Ext$[\mu]$ of the minimum 0-extension problem, where $\mu$ and $c$ are not assumed to be symmetric. We extend the NP-hardness condition of 0-Ext$[\mu]$ to $\overrightarrow{0}$-Ext$[\mu]$: If $\mu$ cannot be represented as the shortest path metric of an orientable modular graph with an orbit-invariant ``directed'' edge-length, then $\overrightarrow{0}$-Ext$[\mu]$ is NP-hard. We also show a partial converse: If $\mu$ is a directed metric of a modular lattice with an orbit-invariant directed edge-length, then $\overrightarrow{0}$-Ext$[\mu]$ is tractable. We further provide a new NP-hardness condition characteristic of $\overrightarrow{0}$-Ext$[\mu]$, and establish a dichotomy for the case where $\mu$ is a directed metric of a star.