Size and stability of vertebrate leks

Lek size varies greatly among lekking species. At present there is no explicit theoretical explanation for this diversity. We extend an existing model of optimal lek size that incorporates female mating preferences and male-male contest competition. The model shows that variation in lek size is predicted by the interaction between lek size, overall copulation rate and the proportion of copulations accruing to males of different rank. In species where females prefer to mate on the largest leks and high-ranking males are able to monopolize females irrespective of the size of the lek, the maximum lek size will be large. Conversely, in species where females show weak preference for mating on large leks or increasing lek size quickly results in scramble competition, the maximum lek size will be smaller. Thus, differences between species in lek size may be due largely to differences in the extent to which high-ranking males can monopolize mating opportunities. Leks become unstable and break down when high-ranking males can no longer get their 'expected' copulation success. Therefore, the mechanism that generates male clustering, that is, sexual parasitism of high-ranking males by subordinates, also sets a limit to the largest stable lek size. Copyright 1999 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.

[1]  Hanna Kokko,et al.  Measures of Inequality Are Not Equal , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[2]  Rufus A. Johnstone,et al.  Imperfect female choice and male mating skew on leks of different sizes , 1999, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[3]  H. Kokko,et al.  Individual mating success, lek stability, and the neglected limitations of statistical power , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[4]  H. Kokko The Lekking Game: Can Female Choice Explain Aggregated Male Displays? , 1997 .

[5]  H. Kokko,et al.  Measuring the Mating Skew , 1997, The American Naturalist.

[6]  F. Widemo,et al.  The Social Implications of traditional use of lek sites in the ruff Philomachus pugnax , 1997 .

[7]  Ross H. Crozier,et al.  Reproductive skew simplified , 1996 .

[8]  W. Sutherland From Individual Behaviour to Population Ecology , 1996 .

[9]  Fredrik Widemo,et al.  Measuring sexual selection , 1995, Nature.

[10]  W. Sutherland,et al.  Measuring sexual selection , 1995, Nature.

[11]  Widemo,et al.  Beauty is in the eye of the beholder: causes and consequences of variation in mating preferences. , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[12]  Fredrik Widemo Competition for females on leks when male competitive abilities differ: empirical test of a model , 1998 .

[13]  F. Widemo,et al.  Lek size, male mating skew and the evolution of lekking , 1995, Nature.

[14]  Fredrik Widemo Distribution models and the evolution of lekking : with empirical tests on the ruff, Philomachus pugnax , 1995 .

[15]  R. H. Wiley Lekking in Birds and Mammals: Behavioral and Evolutionary Issues , 1991 .