Voluntary Motor Output Is Altered by Spike-Timing-Dependent Changes in the Human Corticospinal Pathway

Repeated pairs of timed presynaptic and postsynaptic potentials cause lasting changes in efficacy of transmission at many synapses. The corticospinal tract is the major pathway controlling voluntary movement in humans, and corticospinal neurons have monosynaptic connections to motoneurons of many muscles. We hypothesized that corticospinal transmission in humans could be altered by delivering, to the corticospinal–motoneuronal synapses, timed pairs of presynaptic volleys (produced by cortical stimulation) and antidromic postsynaptic volleys (by peripheral nerve stimulation). To test corticospinal transmission, electrical cervicomedullary stimuli evoked motor responses [cervicomedullary motor-evoked potentials (CMEPs)] in biceps brachii before and for 1 h after conditioning with 50 paired cortical and peripheral nerve stimuli. Seven interstimulus intervals (ISIs) of conditioning stimulus pairs were tested on different days. With one ISI (+3 ms; cortical before peripheral nerve stimulation), CMEPs were significantly increased in size by 33 ± 30% (mean ± SD; n = 7) from 4 until 32 min after conditioning. With two other ISIs (−13 ms, +22 ms), CMEPs were decreased from ∼30 until 60 min after conditioning (by 25 ± 23% and 27 ± 32%; n = 8). The remaining ISIs produced no changes. In a second study, subjects performed weak bilateral voluntary elbow flexion contractions before and after conditioning of the right elbow flexors. Conditioning ISIs that increased or decreased CMEPs similarly increased or decreased voluntary force and EMG on the right. Thus, depending on their timing, repeated paired stimuli can potentiate or depress corticospinal transmission, and these changes are functionally relevant. We suggest that bidirectional spike-timing-dependent plasticity can be induced at corticospinal–motoneuronal synapses and can influence voluntary motor output.

[1]  L. Cohen,et al.  A temporally asymmetric Hebbian rule governing plasticity in the human motor cortex. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  H. Markram,et al.  Regulation of Synaptic Efficacy by Coincidence of Postsynaptic APs and EPSPs , 1997, Science.

[3]  Katsumi Nakajima,et al.  Direct and indirect pathways for corticospinal control of upper limb motoneurons in the primate. , 2004, Progress in brain research.

[4]  D. Feldman,et al.  Timing-Based LTP and LTD at Vertical Inputs to Layer II/III Pyramidal Cells in Rat Barrel Cortex , 2000, Neuron.

[5]  E Henneman,et al.  Terminals of Single Ia Fibers: Distribution within a Pool of 300 Homonymous Motor Neurons , 1968, Science.

[6]  B Bigland-Ritchie,et al.  Motor-unit discharge rates in maximal voluntary contractions of three human muscles. , 1983, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  Y. Dan,et al.  Spike timing-dependent plasticity: a Hebbian learning rule. , 2008, Annual review of neuroscience.

[8]  M. Poo,et al.  Calcium stores regulate the polarity and input specificity of synaptic modification , 2000, Nature.

[9]  D. Debanne,et al.  Long‐term synaptic plasticity between pairs of individual CA3 pyramidal cells in rat hippocampal slice cultures , 1998, The Journal of physiology.

[10]  C D Marsden,et al.  Percutaneous electrical stimulation of corticospinal pathways at the level of the pyramidal decussation in humans , 1991, Annals of neurology.

[11]  G. Bi,et al.  Synaptic modification by correlated activity: Hebb's postulate revisited. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.

[12]  S C Gandevia,et al.  Noninvasive stimulation of the human corticospinal tract. , 2004, Journal of applied physiology.

[13]  G. Bi,et al.  Synaptic Modifications in Cultured Hippocampal Neurons: Dependence on Spike Timing, Synaptic Strength, and Postsynaptic Cell Type , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  C. Crone,et al.  Amplitude of the maximum motor response (Mmax) in human muscles typically decreases during the course of an experiment , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[15]  Stephan Riek,et al.  The sites of neural adaptation induced by resistance training in humans , 2002, The Journal of physiology.

[16]  S. Miller,et al.  Excitation of the corticospinal tract by electromagnetic and electrical stimulation of the scalp in the macaque monkey. , 1990, The Journal of physiology.

[17]  E. Fetz,et al.  Tests for presynaptic modulation of corticospinal terminals from peripheral afferents and pyramidal tract in the macaque , 2006, The Journal of physiology.

[18]  P. J. Sjöström,et al.  Rate, Timing, and Cooperativity Jointly Determine Cortical Synaptic Plasticity , 2001, Neuron.

[19]  Johannes J. Letzkus,et al.  Learning Rules for Spike Timing-Dependent Plasticity Depend on Dendritic Synapse Location , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  N. Spruston,et al.  Action potential initiation and backpropagation in neurons of the mammalian CNS , 1997, Trends in Neurosciences.

[21]  J. Nielsen,et al.  Is presynaptic inhibition distributed to corticospinal fibres in man? , 1994, The Journal of physiology.

[22]  E Henneman,et al.  Quantitative measures of output of a motoneuron pool during monosynaptic reflexes. , 1974, Journal of Neurophysiology.

[23]  B. Day,et al.  Stimulation of the human motor cortex through the scalp , 1991, Experimental physiology.

[24]  P Ashby,et al.  Corticospinal projections to upper limb motoneurones in humans. , 1992, The Journal of physiology.

[25]  J. Kleim,et al.  Motor training induces experience-specific patterns of plasticity across motor cortex and spinal cord. , 2006, Journal of applied physiology.

[26]  E. Kunesch,et al.  Timing‐dependent plasticity in human primary somatosensory cortex , 2005, The Journal of physiology.

[27]  S. Gandevia,et al.  The effect of electrical stimulation of the corticospinal tract on motor units of the human biceps brachii , 2002, The Journal of physiology.

[28]  P J Delwaide,et al.  Corticomotoneuronal synaptic connections in normal man: an electrophysiological study. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[29]  M. Häusser,et al.  Dendritic coincidence detection of EPSPs and action potentials , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[30]  Simon C Gandevia,et al.  Depression of Activity in the Corticospinal Pathway during Human Motor Behavior after Strong Voluntary Contractions , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[31]  S C Gandevia,et al.  Group III and IV muscle afferents differentially affect the motor cortex and motoneurones in humans , 2008, The Journal of physiology.

[32]  A. McComas,et al.  Potentiation and depression of the M wave in human biceps brachii. , 1996, The Journal of physiology.

[33]  Y. Dan,et al.  Spike Timing-Dependent Plasticity of Neural Circuits , 2004, Neuron.

[34]  S C Gandevia,et al.  Impaired response of human motoneurones to corticospinal stimulation after voluntary exercise , 1999, The Journal of physiology.

[35]  G. A. Robinson,et al.  Adaptation of cat motoneurons to sustained and intermittent extracellular activation. , 1993, The Journal of physiology.

[36]  P. J. Sjöström,et al.  Dendritic excitability and synaptic plasticity. , 2008, Physiological reviews.

[37]  E Henneman,et al.  Rank order of motoneurons within a pool: law of combination. , 1974, Journal of neurophysiology.

[38]  W. Levy,et al.  Temporal contiguity requirements for long-term associative potentiation/depression in the hippocampus , 1983, Neuroscience.

[39]  L. Cohen,et al.  Induction of plasticity in the human motor cortex by paired associative stimulation. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[40]  M. Larkum,et al.  Propagation of action potentials in the dendrites of neurons from rat spinal cord slice cultures. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[41]  Homonymous and heteronymous monosynaptic reflexes in biceps brachii , 1995, Muscle & nerve.

[42]  S. Gandevia,et al.  Interaction of transcranial magnetic stimulation and electrical transmastoid stimulation in human subjects , 2002, The Journal of physiology.