What form of memory underlies novelty preferences?

Novelty preferences (longer fixations on new stimuli than on previously presented stimuli) are widely used to assess memory in nonverbal populations, such as human infants and experimental animals, yet important questions remain about the nature of the processes that underlie them. We used a classical conditioning paradigm to test whether novelty preferences reflect (1) a stimulus-driven bias toward novelty in visual selective attention or (2) explicit memory for old stimuli. Results indicated that conditioning affected adults’ looking behavior in the visual paired comparison, but not their recognition memory judgments. Furthermore, the typically observed novelty preference occurred only when a bias toward novelty had no competition from a bias toward salience due to conditioning. These results suggest that novelty preferences may reflect attentional processes and implicit memory to a greater degree than explicit memory, a finding with important implications for understanding memory in nonverbal populations and the development of memory in humans.

[1]  J. Mandler How to build a baby: On the development of an accessible representational system☆ , 1988 .

[2]  J. Bachevalier,et al.  The Hippocampal/Parahippocampal Regions and Recognition Memory: Insights from Visual Paired Comparison versus Object-Delayed Nonmatching in Monkeys , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[3]  J. M. Vanderplas,et al.  Complexity, association value, and practice as factors in shape recognition following paired associates training. , 1959, Journal of experimental psychology.

[4]  L. Squire,et al.  The visual paired-comparison task as a measure of declarative memory. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  M. Haith Who put the cog in infant cognition ? Is rich interpretation too costly ? , 1998 .

[6]  Robert M. Nosofsky,et al.  Dissociations Between Categorization and Recognition in Amnesic and Normal Individuals: An Exemplar-Based Interpretation , 1998 .

[7]  J M VANDERPLAS,et al.  The association value of random shapes. , 1959, Journal of experimental psychology.

[8]  F. Baeyens,et al.  Contingency awareness in evaluative conditioning: A case for unaware affective-evaluative learning , 1990 .

[9]  Matthew Flatt,et al.  PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers , 1993 .

[10]  A. Gottfried,et al.  FAMILIARITY AND NOVELTY PREFERENCES IN INFANT RECOGNITION MEMORY: IMPLICATIONS FOR INFORMATION PROCESSING , 1982 .

[11]  H. Begleiter,et al.  A neurophysiologic correlate of visual short-term memory in humans. , 1993, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[12]  T. Palmeri,et al.  Learning About Categories in the Absence of Training: Profound Amnesia and the Relationship Between Perceptual Categorization and Recognition Memory , 1999 .

[13]  M. W. Brown,et al.  Neuronal activity related to visual recognition memory: long-term memory and the encoding of recency and familiarity information in the primate anterior and medial inferior temporal and rhinal cortex , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[14]  E. Miller,et al.  Habituation-like decrease in the responses of neurons in inferior temporal cortex of the macaque , 1991, Visual Neuroscience.

[15]  R. Zajonc,et al.  Affective discrimination of stimuli that cannot be recognized. , 1980, Science.

[16]  R. Desimone,et al.  The representation of stimulus familiarity in anterior inferior temporal cortex. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[18]  D. Schacter,et al.  Infants, Amnesics, and Dissociable Memory Systems , 1984 .

[19]  R. L. Fantz Visual Experience in Infants: Decreased Attention to Familiar Patterns Relative to Novel Ones , 1964, Science.

[20]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms for visual memory and their role in attention. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  Zili Liu,et al.  Dissociating stimulus information from internal representation—a case study in object recognition , 1999, Vision Research.

[22]  P. Lang,et al.  International Affective Picture System (IAPS): Instruction Manual and Affective Ratings (Tech. Rep. No. A-4) , 1999 .

[23]  O. Pascalis,et al.  Recognition memory in 3- to 4-day-old human neonates. , 1994, Neuroreport.

[24]  C. Rovee-Collier Dissociations in infant memory: rethinking the development of implicit and explicit memory. , 1997, Psychological review.

[25]  B. Hood Is looking good enough or does it beggar belief? , 2004, Developmental science.

[26]  Malcolm W. Brown,et al.  Different Contributions of the Hippocampus and Perirhinal Cortex to Recognition Memory , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  Judith F. Feldman,et al.  Infant visual recognition memory: independent contributions of speed and attention. , 2003, Developmental psychology.

[28]  Charles A. Nelson,et al.  The Ontogeny of Human Memory: A Cognitive Neuroscience Perspective. , 1995 .

[29]  B. Roder,et al.  Infants' Preferences for Familiarity and Novelty During the Course of Visual Processing. , 2000, Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies.

[30]  L R Squire,et al.  On the development of declarative memory. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[31]  Denis Mareschal,et al.  An Interacting Systems Model of Infant Habituation , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[32]  G. M. Reicher,et al.  Familiarity of background characters in visual scanning. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[33]  M. W. Brown,et al.  Effects of the novelty or familiarity of visual stimuli on the expression of the immediate early gene c-fos in rat brain , 1995, Neuroscience.

[34]  L. Oakes,et al.  Short- and long-term memory in infancy and early childhood : taking the first steps toward remembering , 2007 .