Consequences of global climate change for geographic distributions of cerrado tree species

The present study applies a series of new techniques to understand the conservation of Cerrado tree species in the face of climate change. We applied techniques from the emerging field of ecological niche modeling to develop a first-pass assessment of likely effects of climate change on tree species’ distributions in the Cerrado biome by relating known occurrence points to electronic maps summarizing ecological dimensions. Distributional data represent 15,657 records for 162 tree species occurring in Cerrado. By focusing on the trees of one important and highly endemic biome, rather than the biota of a political unit, we were able to focus on developing biome-wide projections. An important limitation of this study is that only those species with more than 30 unique occurrence records were used-hence, the study is limited to those species of relatively broad geographic distribution, and does not take into account those species with narrower geographic distributions. Global climate change scenarios considered were drawn from the general circulation models of HadCM2; we assessed both a conservative and a less conservative scenario of how climates could change over the next 50 year using the (Hadley HHGSDX50 and HHGGAX50 scenarios, respectively): HHGSDX50 assumes 0.5%/yr CO2 increase, whereas HHGGAX50 assumes a 1%/yr CO2 increase. Results of predictions of present and future distributions varied widely among species. Present distributional models predicted areas of 655,211-2,287,482 out of the 2,496,230 km2 core area of Cerrado in Brazil. All models used to represent species’ present geographic ranges were highly statistically significant based on independent test data sets of point localities. Most species were projected to decline seriously in potential distributional area, with both scenarios anticipating losses of >50% of potential distributional area for essentially all species. Indeed, out of 162 species examined, between the two climate change scenarios, 18 (HHGSDX50 scenario) - 56 (HHGGAX50 scenario) were predicted to end up without habitable areas in the Cerrado region, and 91 (HHGSDX50 scenario) - 123 (HHGGAX50 scenario) species were predicted to decline by more than 90% in potential distributional area in the Cerrado region. Bearing in mind the limitations of the method, and considering its explicit assumptions, these results nevertheless should be cause for ample concern regarding Cerrado biodiversity. Since only 2.25% of the Cerrado biome is presently protected, this future scenario presents a pessimistic forecast, which would likely include widespread species loss from the biome, as well as dramatic shifts to the south and east, further complicating conservation planning efforts.

[1]  David R. B. Stockwell,et al.  Effects of sample size on accuracy of species distribution models , 2002 .

[2]  C. Atkinson,et al.  Interactions of climate change with biological invasions and land use in the Hawaiian Islands: Modeling the fate of endemic birds using a geographic information system , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  A. Peterson,et al.  Geographic analysis of conservation priority: endemic birds and mammals in Veracruz, Mexico , 2000 .

[4]  A. O. Nicholls,et al.  Measurement of the realized qualitative niche: environmental niches of five Eucalyptus species , 1990 .

[5]  J. A. Ratter,et al.  The Brazilian Cerrado Vegetation and Threats to its Biodiversity , 1997 .

[6]  Mark V. Lomolino An evaluation of alternative strategies for building networks of nature reserves , 1994 .

[7]  A. Peterson,et al.  Preliminary distributional analysis of US endangered bird species , 2000, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[8]  Eric Dinerstein,et al.  Beyond “Hotspots”: How to Prioritize Investments to Conserve Biodiversity in the Indo-Pacific Region , 1993 .

[9]  R. Leemans,et al.  Assessing effects of forecasted climate change on the diversity and distribution of European higher plants for 2050 , 2002 .

[10]  David R. B. Stockwell,et al.  Future projections for Mexican faunas under global climate change scenarios , 2002, Nature.

[11]  A. Peterson,et al.  PREDICTING SPECIES' GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTIONS BASED ON ECOLOGICAL NICHE MODELING , 2001 .

[12]  A. Peterson,et al.  Assessment of invasive potential of Homalodisca coagulata in western North America and south America , 2003 .

[13]  F. Chapin,et al.  Consequences of changing biodiversity , 2000, Nature.

[14]  V. Sánchez‐Cordero,et al.  Conservatism of ecological niches in evolutionary time , 1999, Science.

[15]  Robert P. Anderson,et al.  Geographical distributions of spiny pocket mice in South America: insights from predictive models , 2002 .

[16]  A. Townsend Peterson,et al.  Prioritization of areas in China for the conservation of endangered birds using modelled geographical distributions , 2002 .

[17]  C. Klink,et al.  Ecological impact of agricultural development in the Brazilian cerrados. , 1993 .

[18]  A. Peterson,et al.  Ecologic Niche Modeling and Potential Reservoirs for Chagas Disease, Mexico. , 2002, Emerging infectious diseases.

[19]  A. Peterson Projected climate change effects on Rocky Mountain and Great Plains birds: generalities of biodiversity consequences , 2003 .

[20]  David R. B. Stockwell,et al.  Genetic Algorithms II , 1999 .

[21]  N. Myers Threatened biotas: "Hot spots" in tropical forests , 1988, The Environmentalist.

[22]  David R. B. Stockwell,et al.  Induction of sets of rules from animal distribution data: a robust and informative method of data analysis , 1992 .

[23]  J. Grinnell Field Tests of Theories Concerning Distributional Control , 1917, The American Naturalist.

[24]  Robert J. Marquis,et al.  18. Biodiversity and Conservation Priorities in the Cerrado Region , 2002 .

[25]  Manuela M. P. Huso,et al.  A comparison of reserve selection algorithms using data on terrestrial vertebrates in Oregon , 1997 .

[26]  Daniel C. Nepstad,et al.  Land-use in Amazonia and the Cerrado of Brazil: State of Knowledge and GIS Database , 1997 .

[27]  A. Peterson,et al.  Effects of global climate change on geographic distributions of Mexican Cracidae , 2001 .

[28]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. , 2000, Science.

[29]  P. Oliveira,et al.  17. Pollination and Reproductive Biology in Cerrado Plant Communities , 2002 .

[30]  A. Peterson,et al.  Prediction of bird community composition based on point‐occurrence data and inferential algorithms: a valuable tool in biodiversity assessments , 2002 .

[31]  R. Mittermeier,et al.  Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities , 2000, Nature.

[32]  Michael S. Gaines,et al.  Analysis of adaptation in heterogeneous landscapes: Implications for the evolution of fundamental niches , 1992, Evolutionary Ecology.

[33]  D. Carson,et al.  Climate modelling: Achievements and prospects , 1999 .

[34]  J. Lawton,et al.  Making mistakes when predicting shifts in species range in response to global warming , 1998, Nature.

[35]  Robert P. Anderson,et al.  Evaluating predictive models of species’ distributions: criteria for selecting optimal models , 2003 .

[36]  A. Peterson,et al.  Predicting the potential invasive distributions of four alien plant species in North America , 2003, Weed Science.

[37]  K. Wessels,et al.  Vulnerability of South African animal taxa to climate change , 2002 .

[38]  David R. B. Stockwell,et al.  The GARP modelling system: problems and solutions to automated spatial prediction , 1999, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[39]  J. A. Ratter,et al.  Analysis of the floristic composition of the Brazilian cerrado vegetation II: Comparison of the woody vegetation of 98 areas , 1996 .

[40]  Robert J. Marquis,et al.  The Cerrados of Brazil: Ecology and Natural History of a Neotropical Savanna , 2002 .

[41]  R. Mittermeier,et al.  Hotspots: Earth's Biologically Richest and Most Endangered Terrestrial Ecoregions , 2000 .

[42]  T. Nudds,et al.  Effects of Climate Change and Land Use on Duck Abundance in Canadian Prairie‐Parklands , 1995 .

[43]  A. Peterson,et al.  Sensitivity of distributional prediction algorithms to geographic data completeness , 1999 .