Steady-state evoked potentials to tag specific components of nociceptive cortical processing

Studies have shown that the periodic repetition of a stimulus induces, at certain stimulation frequencies, a sustained electro-cortical response of corresponding frequency, referred to as steady-state evoked potential (SSEP). Using infrared laser stimulation, we recently showed that SSEPs can be used to explore nociceptive cortical processing. Here, we implemented a novel approach to elicit such responses, using a periodic intra-epidermal electrical stimulation of cutaneous Aδ-nociceptors (Aδ-SSEPs). Using a wide range of frequencies (3-43 Hz), we compared the scalp topographies and temporal dynamics of these Aδ-SSEPs to the Aβ-SSEPs elicited by non-nociceptive transcutaneous electrical stimulation, as well as to the transient ERPs elicited by the onsets of the 10-s stimulation trains, applied to the left and right hand. At 3 Hz, we found that the topographies of Aβ- and Aδ-SSEPs were both maximal at the scalp vertex, and resembled closely that of the late P2 wave of transient ERPs, suggesting activity originating from the same neuronal populations. The responses also showed marked habituation, suggesting that they were mainly related to unspecific, attention-related processes. In contrast, at frequencies >3 Hz, the topographies of Aβ- and Aδ-SSEPs were markedly different. Aβ-SSEPs were maximal over the contralateral parietal region, whereas Aδ-SSEPs were maximal over midline frontal regions, thus indicating an entrainment of distinct neuronal populations. Furthermore, the responses showed no habituation, suggesting more obligatory and specific stages of sensory processing. Taken together, our results indicate that Aβ- and Aδ-SSEPs offer a unique opportunity to study the cortical representation of nociception and touch.

[1]  Anthony K. P. Jones,et al.  The cortical representation of pain , 1999, PAIN.

[2]  D. A. Thomas,et al.  Response properties and organization of nociceptive neurons in area 1 of monkey primary somatosensory cortex. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  C. Herrmann.  Human EEG responses to 1–100 Hz flicker: resonance phenomena in visual cortex and their potential correlation to cognitive phenomena , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[4]  A Z Snyder,et al.  Steady-state vibration evoked potentials: descriptions of technique and characterization of responses. , 1992, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[5]  L. V. D. Heiden.  Steady-state evoked potentials for Brain Computer Interface , 2009 .

[6]  Matthias M. Müller,et al.  Sustained spatial attention to vibration is mediated in primary somatosensory cortex , 2007, NeuroImage.

[7]  A. Cichocki,et al.  Steady-state visually evoked potentials: Focus on essential paradigms and future perspectives , 2010, Progress in Neurobiology.

[8]  Steven G. Johnson,et al.  FFTW: an adaptive software architecture for the FFT , 1998, Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, ICASSP '98 (Cat. No.98CH36181).

[9]  P. Strick,et al.  The Spinothalamic System Targets Motor and Sensory Areas in the Cerebral Cortex of Monkeys , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  R. Treede,et al.  Nerve fibre discharges, cerebral potentials and sensations induced by CO2 laser stimulation. , 1984, Human neurobiology.

[11]  A. Mouraux,et al.  Determinants of laser-evoked EEG responses: pain perception or stimulus saliency? , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  M. Bach,et al.  Do's and don'ts in Fourier analysis of steady-state potentials , 2004, Documenta Ophthalmologica.

[13]  E. Valentini,et al.  The primary somatosensory cortex largely contributes to the early part of the cortical response elicited by nociceptive stimuli , 2011, NeuroImage.

[14]  A. Carmon,et al.  Evoked cerebral responses to noxious thermal stimuli in humans , 1976, Experimental Brain Research.

[15]  Fred Tam,et al.  Magnetoencephalographic study of vibrotactile evoked transient and steady-state responses in human somatosensory cortex , 2006, NeuroImage.

[16]  W. Miltner,et al.  Scalp topography of ultralate (C-fibres) evoked potentials following thulium YAG laser stimuli to tiny skin surface areas in humans , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[17]  Rolf-Detlef Treede,et al.  Laser-evoked potentials are graded and somatotopically organized anteroposteriorly in the operculoinsular cortex of anesthetized monkeys. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  Shozo Tobimatsu,et al.  Steady-state vibration somatosensory evoked potentials: physiological characteristics and tuning function , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[19]  Luis Garcia-Larrea,et al.  Somatosensory volleys and cortical evoked potentials: ‘First come, first served’? , 2004, Pain.

[20]  Gian Domenico Iannetti,et al.  The primary somatosensory cortex largely contributes to the early part of the cortical response elicited by nociceptive stimuli , 2011, NeuroImage.

[21]  G. Plourde.  Auditory evoked potentials. , 2006, Best practice & research. Clinical anaesthesiology.

[22]  A Mouraux,et al.  Are the processes reflected by late and ultra-late laser evoked potentials specific of nociception? , 2006, Supplements to Clinical neurophysiology.

[23]  A. Mouraux,et al.  Low intensity intra-epidermal electrical stimulation can activate Aδ-nociceptors selectively , 2010, PAIN.

[24]  A. Apkarian,et al.  Cortical representation of pain: functional characterization of nociceptive areas near the lateral sulcus , 2000, Pain.

[25]  S A Hillyard,et al.  Feature-selective attention enhances color signals in early visual areas of the human brain , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  „Resonance-like“ Frequencies of Sensorimotor Areas Evoked by Repetitive Tactile Stimulation - Resonanzeffekte in sensomotorischen Arealen, evoziert durch rhythmische taktile Stimulation , 2001, Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering.

[27]  B L Whitsel,et al.  Response of anterior parietal cortex to different modes of same-site skin stimulation. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  B Bromm,et al.  Late somatosensory evoked cerebral potentials in response to cutaneous heat stimuli. , 1988, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[29]  Mark Tommerdahl,et al.  Area 3a neuron response to skin nociceptor afferent drive. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[30]  A Mouraux,et al.  Across-trial averaging of event-related EEG responses and beyond. , 2008, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[31]  Erkki Oja,et al.  Independent component analysis: algorithms and applications , 2000, Neural Networks.

[32]  R. Kakigi,et al.  Preferential stimulation of Aδ fibers by intra-epidermal needle electrode in humans , 2002, Pain.

[33]  D. Regan,et al.  Human brain electrophysiology , 1989 .

[34]  P. M. Rossini,et al.  Recommendations for the clinical use of somatosensory-evoked potentials , 2008, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[35]  Rolf-Detlef Treede,et al.  Dipole source analyses of laser evoked potentials obtained from subdural grid recordings from primary somatic sensory cortex. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[36]  L. Garcia-Larrea,et al.  Contribution of attentional and cognitive factors to laser evoked brain potentials , 2003, Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology.

[37]  A. Mouraux,et al.  From the neuromatrix to the pain matrix (and back) , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[38]  A. Mouraux,et al.  Nociceptive Steady-State Evoked Potentials Elicited by Rapid Periodic Thermal Stimulation of Cutaneous Nociceptors , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[39]  M. Frot,et al.  Brain generators of laser-evoked potentials: from dipoles to functional significance , 2003, Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology.

[40]  A. Mouraux,et al.  The pain matrix reloaded A salience detection system for the body , 2011, Progress in Neurobiology.

[41]  D. Regan.  Human brain electrophysiology: Evoked potentials and evoked magnetic fields in science and medicine , 1989 .