FLOvane: A New Approach for High-Pressure Vane Design

This paper presents a new unconventional philosophy for high-pressure (HP) vane design. It is proposed that the most natural design starting point for admitting and accelerating flow with minimum loss and secondary flow is a trumpet-shaped flow-path which gradually turns to the desired angle. Multiple trumpet-shaped inlets are seamlessly blended into the (annular or partitioned) combustor walls resulting in a highly lofted flow-path, rather than a traditional flow-path defined by distinct airfoil and endwall surfaces. We call this trumped-shaped inlet the fully lofted oval vane (FLOvane). The purpose of this paper is to describe the FLOvane concept and to present back-to-back CFD analyses of two current industrial gas turbines with conventional and FLOvanemodified designs. The resulting designs diverge significantly from conventional designs in terms of both process and final geometric form. Computational fluid dynamic predictions for the FLOvane-modified designs show improved aerodynamic performance characteristics, reduced heat load, improved cooling performance, improved thermal-mechanical life, and improved stage/engine efficiency. The mechanisms for improved performance include reduction of secondary flows, reduced mixing of coolant flow with the mainstream flow, reduced skin friction, and improved coolant distribution. In the two current industrial gas turbine engines, the absolute (percentage point) improvement in stage isentropic efficiency when the FLOvane design was included was estimated at 0.33% points and 0.40% points without cooling flow reduction, and 1.5% points in one case and much more is expected for the other case when cooling flow reductions were accounted for.

[1]  Richard J Goldstein,et al.  Influence of Blade Leading Edge Geometry on Turbine Endwall Heat (Mass) Transfer , 2006 .

[2]  Liping Xu,et al.  Blade Lean and Shroud Leakage Flows in Low Aspect Ratio Turbines , 2012 .

[3]  J. H. Horlock,et al.  Limitations on Gas Turbine Performance Imposed by Large Turbine Cooling Flows , 2000 .

[4]  Graham Pullan,et al.  The Influence of Sweep on Axial Flow Turbine Aerodynamics at Mid-Span , 2006 .

[5]  Sumanta Acharya,et al.  Experimental Investigation of Secondary Flow Structure in a Blade Passage With and Without Leading Edge Fillets , 2007 .

[6]  Graham Pullan,et al.  Influence of Sweep on Axial Flow Turbine Aerodynamics at Midspan , 2007 .

[7]  T. I-P. Shih,et al.  Controlling Secondary-Flow Structure by Leading-Edge Airfoil Fillet and Inlet Swirl to Reduce Aerodynamic Loss and Surface Heat Transfer , 2003 .

[8]  R. Reed The Superalloys: Fundamentals and Applications , 2006 .

[9]  Karen A. Thole,et al.  Computational Design and Experimental Evaluation of Using a Leading Edge Fillet on a Gas Turbine Vane , 2002 .

[10]  Terrence W. Simon,et al.  Turbine Endwall Aerodynamics and Heat Transfer , 2006 .

[11]  S. Harrison,et al.  The influence of blade lean on turbine losses , 1990 .

[12]  Graham Pullan,et al.  The Influence of Sweep on Axial Flow Turbine Aerodynamics in the Endwall Region , 2008 .

[13]  Andrew T. Lethander,et al.  Vane-Endwall Junction Optimization to Reduce Turbine Vane Passage Adiabatic Wall Temperatures , 2004 .