Value of spatial data: networked performance beyond economic rhetoric

Assessing the economic value of spatial data is problematic for various reasons – conceptual as well as operational. The paper argues that understanding the value of spatial data will benefit from the market discourse and salient conditions can be identified when viewed in terms of market transactions rather than in terms of neoclassical economic rhetoric. Therefore, spatial data markets can best be understood as socio-technical actor networks. Moreover, spatial data are multifaceted and are likely understood differently by different people. Space matters but differently at different spatial levels, and different decision-making contexts and styles may require different types of data and information. Hence, the paper argues that the value of spatial data is added through a complex value network rather than a sequential value chain. Consequently, the SDI-assessment discourse is of particular relevance for assessing the value of spatial data when understood as networked performance; specifically, the multi-view approach. In conclusion, the paper recommends a deliberative, pragmatic and actor-network focus on spatial data and transdisciplinary framing of assessing their value.

[1]  Piotr Jankowski,et al.  Toward a Framework for Research on Geographic Information-Supported Participatory Decision-Making , 2003 .

[2]  C. Kwa.  Romantic and Baroque Conceptions of Complex Wholes in the Sciences , 2020, Complexities.

[3]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  A framework for collaboration and knowledge management , 2001, Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[4]  Neil Fligstein,et al.  Markets as Politics: A Political‐Cultural Approach to Market Institutions , 1996 .

[5]  Roger F. Tomlinson,et al.  Geographic Information Systems—a new frontier , 1990 .

[6]  J. Crompvoets,et al.  A Network Perspective on Spatial Data Infrastructures: Application to the Sub‐national SDI of Flanders (Belgium) , 2009 .

[7]  Massimo Craglia,et al.  Introduction to the International Journal of Spatial Data Infrastructures Research , 2006, Int. J. Spatial Data Infrastructures Res..

[8]  B. Flyvbjerg.  Making Social Science Matter , 2001 .

[9]  J Harlan,et al.  Research and Theory in Advancing Spatial Data Infrastructure Concepts , 2007 .

[10]  Jonathan Rosenhead,et al.  Planning under Uncertainty: II. A Methodology for Robustness Analysis , 1980 .

[11]  Geert Bouckaert,et al.  Managing Performance: International Comparisons , 2007 .

[12]  Mark J. Safferstone.  Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy , 1999 .

[13]  Mei-Po Kwan,et al.  Introduction: Critical GIS , 2005, Cartogr. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Geovisualization.

[14]  Jean Hartley,et al.  Case study research , 2004 .

[15]  Malcolm J. Bowman,et al.  Proceedings of the Workshop , 1978 .

[16]  Herbert A. Simon.  The new science of management decision. , 1960 .

[17]  B. Nicolescu,et al.  Transdisciplinarity-Past, Present and Future , 2009 .

[18]  R. Coase.  The Institutional Structure of Production , 1992 .

[19]  Abbas Rajabifard,et al.  A Multi-view Framework to Assess Spatial Data Infrastructures , 2008 .

[20]  Jennifer E. Rowley,et al.  The wisdom hierarchy: representations of the DIKW hierarchy , 2007, J. Inf. Sci..

[21]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Information Technology and Social Transformation: GIS for Forestry Management in India , 2001, Inf. Soc..

[22]  R. Coase.  The Nature of the Firm , 1937 .

[23]  P. Burrough.  Principles of Geographical Information Systems for Land Resources Assessment , 1986 .

[24]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  Investigating Information Systems with Ethnographic Research , 1999, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[25]  Roger A. Longhorn,et al.  Geographic information - value, pricing, production, and consumption , 2007 .

[26]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[27]  Daniel L. Sherrell,et al.  Communications of the Association for Information Systems , 1999 .

[28]  Ian Masser.  GIS Worlds: Creating Spatial Data Infrastructures , 2005 .

[29]  B. Barr.  Geographic Information: a resource, a commodity, an asset or an infrastructure? , 1997 .

[30]  W. H. Erik de Man,et al.  Establishing a geographical information system in relation to its use A process of strategic choices , 1988, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[31]  Jens Beckert.  The social order of markets , 2009 .

[32]  Annemarie Mol,et al.  Complexities: An Introduction , 2002, Complexities.

[33]  A. Krek,et al.  Quantifying transaction costs of geoinformation: Experiments in national information structures in Sweden and Germany , 2009 .

[34]  E. Ü. Yücesoy.  Everyday Urban Public Space: Turkish Immigrant Women's Perspective , 2008 .

[35]  Gerd Infanger.  Planning under uncertainty , 1992 .

[36]  Jonathan Rosenhead,et al.  Planning Under Uncertainty: 1. The Inflexibility of Methodologies , 1980 .

[37]  W.H.E. de Man,et al.  Are spatial data infrastructures special , 2007 .

[38]  J. Law.  Actor-network theory and material semiotics , 2009 .

[39]  S. L. Star,et al.  The Ethnography of Infrastructure , 1999 .

[40]  Manfred A. Max-Neef.  Foundations of transdisciplinarity , 2005 .

[41]  M. Callon.  What Does It Mean to Say That Economics Is Performative? , 2006, Do Economists Make Markets?.

[42]  Barry Smith.  Objects and their environments: From Aristotle to ecological ontology , 2001 .

[43]  Dorothea Hilhorst,et al.  Mapping Vulnerability: Disasters, Development and People , 2004 .

[44]  O. Williamson.  Transaction Cost Economics: How It Works; Where It is Headed , 1998 .

[45]  M. Callon,et al.  Некоторые элементы социологии перевода: приручение морских гребешков и рыболовов бухты Сен-Бриё , 2017 .

[46]  M. Lawas,et al.  The resource user's knowledge, the neglected input in land resource management : the case of the Kankanaey farmers in Benguet, Philippines , 1997 .

[47]  A.J.J. van der Valk,et al.  Interdisciplinary and Transdisciplinary Landscape Studies : Potential and Limitations DELTA SERIES 2 , Wageningen , 2003 .

[48]  David Thacher.  Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society , 2005 .

[49]  Claude Caron,et al.  Evaluating the socio-economic impact of Geographic Information: A classification of the literature , 2008, Int. J. Spatial Data Infrastructures Res..

[50]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  Management information systems : conceptual foundations, structure, and development , 1985 .

[51]  D. Hilhorst.  Complexity and diversity: unlocking social domains of disaster response , 2003 .

[52]  R. Kaplinsky.  Globalisation and Unequalisation: What Can Be Learned from Value Chain Analysis? , 2000 .

[53]  John Doyle,et al.  Complexity and robustness , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[54]  Claude Caron,et al.  The Value Chain Approach to Evaluate the Economic Impact of Geographic Information: Towards a New Visual Tool , 2009 .

[55]  Paul J. Densham.  Research Initiative Six: Spatial Decision Support Systems- Scientific Report for the Specialist Meeting (90-5) , 1990 .

[56]  David M. Mark,et al.  Geographical categories: an ontological investigation , 2001, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[57]  Patrik Aspers.  Knowledge and valuation in markets , 2009 .

[58]  Jonas Hedman,et al.  Broadening Information Systems Evalutation Through Narratives , 2005 .

[59]  Michael F. Goodchild,et al.  Geographical information science , 1992, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[60]  G. P. Guarín.  Integrating local knowkledge into GIS-based flood risk assessment : the case of Traingulo and Mabolo communities in Naga city, The Philippines , 2008 .

[61]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Infrastructure and Ethnographic Practice , 2002, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[62]  Brian T. Pentland,et al.  Narrative methods in collaborative systems research , 1999, Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 1999. HICSS-32. Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers.

[63]  Paul M. Gregory.  Fashion and Monopolistic Competition , 1948, Journal of Political Economy.

[64]  R. Normann,et al.  From value chain to value constellation: designing interactive strategy. , 1993, Harvard business review.

[65]  S. Woolgar.  Configuring the User: The Case of Usability Trials , 1990 .

[66]  Martin Frické,et al.  The knowledge pyramid: a critique of the DIKW hierarchy , 2009, J. Inf. Sci..

[67]  I F Matiushin,et al.  [Science and practice]. , 1968, Sovetskoe zdravookhranenie.

[68]  B. Latour.  Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory , 2005 .

[69]  J. Whitney.  Case Study Research , 1999 .

[70]  Giacomo Rambaldi,et al.  Who owns the Map Legend , 2005 .

[71]  O. Williamson.  The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead , 2000 .

[72]  Francis Harvey.  Constructing GIS: Actor Networks of Collaboration , 2001 .

[73]  Patrik Aspers.  Book Review: Donald MacKenzie, Fabian Muniesa and Lucia Siu(eds) Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics , 2008 .

[74]  T. Purcell,et al.  MULTIPLE MENTAL SPACES , 2001 .

[75]  M.-F. Garcia.,et al.  The Social Construction of a Perfect Market: The Strawberry Auction at Fontaines-en-Sologne , 2010 .

[76]  B. Nicolescu.  Manifesto of Transdisciplinarity , 2002 .

[77]  A. Kellerman,et al.  The Constitution of Society : Outline of the Theory of Structuration , 2015 .

[78]  Barbara Tversky,et al.  Structures Of Mental Spaces , 2003 .

[79]  W. Powell,et al.  Institutions , 2010 .

[80]  D. North,et al.  Economic performance through time , 2012 .

[81]  Wei Li,et al.  Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance , 2009, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[82]  B. Flyvbjerg,et al.  Making Social Science Matter: Why Social Inquiry Fails and How It Can Succeed Again , 2001 .

[83]  R. Putnam.  Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital , 1995, The City Reader.

[84]  George A. Akerlof.  The Market for “Lemons”: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism , 1970 .

[85]  M. Callon.  The Sociology of an Actor-Network: The Case of the Electric Vehicle , 1986 .

[86]  E. Ostrom.  Understanding Institutional Diversity , 2005 .

[87]  Nicholas Chrisman,et al.  Full Circle : More than just Social Implications of GIS , 2000 .

[88]  Knut H. Rolland,et al.  Balancing the Local and the Global in Infrastructural Information Systems , 2002, Inf. Soc..

[89]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Studying Information Technology in Organizations: Research Approaches and Assumptions , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[90]  L. Robbins,et al.  An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science. , 1934 .

[91]  Fabrizio Ferraro,et al.  Economics Language and Assumptions: How Theories Can Become Self-Fulfilling , 2003 .

[92]  W. H. Erik de Man.  Understanding SDI; complexity and institutionalization , 2006, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[93]  Eugene W. Martin,et al.  Actor-networks and implementation: examples from conservation GIS in Ecuador , 2000, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[94]  Abbas Rajabifard,et al.  Assessing the worldwide developments of national spatial data clearinghouses , 2004, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[95]  Arnold K. Bregt,et al.  Theoretical introduction to the multi-view framework to assess SDIs , 2008 .

[96]  Piotr Jankowski,et al.  Building Spatial Decision Support Tools for Individuals and Groups , 2003, J. Decis. Syst..

[97]  M. Porter.  Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance , 1985 .

[98]  E. Ostrom.  COPING WITH TRAGEDIES OF THE COMMONS , 1999 .

[99]  Martin Landau,et al.  FEDERALISM. REDUNDANCY AND SYSTEM RELIABILITY , 1973 .