From maternity paper hand-held records to electronic health records: what do women tell us about their use?

The paper hand-held record (PHR) has been used extensively in general practice (GP) shared care management of pregnant women, and recently, the first Mater Shared Electronic Health Record (MSEHR) was introduced. The aim of this qualitative study was to examine women's experiences using the records and the contribution of the records to integrate care. At the 36-week antenatal visit in a maternity tertiary centre clinic, women were identified as a user of either the PHR or the MSEHR and organised into Phase 1 and Phase 2 studies respectively. Fifteen women were interviewed in Phase 1 and 12 women in Phase 2. Semi-structured interviews were used for data collection, and analysed using qualitative content analysis. Four main themes were identified: (1) purpose of the record, (2) perceptions of the record; (3) content of the record, and (4) sharing the record. Findings indicate that the PHR is a well-liked maternity tool. The findings also indicate there is under-usage of the MSEHR due to health-care providers failing to follow up and discuss the option of using the electronic health record option or if a woman has completed the log-in process. This paper adds to an already favourable body of knowledge about the use of the PHR. It is recommended that continued implementation of the MSEHR be undertaken to facilitate its use.

[1]  B. Fisher,et al.  How patients use access to their full health records: a qualitative study of patients in general practice , 2009, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[2]  Margrit Schreier,et al.  Qualitative Content Analysis in Practice , 2012 .

[3]  Brit Ross Winthereik,et al.  Shared care and boundaries: lessons from an online maternity record. , 2008, Journal of health organization and management.

[4]  Michael E. Miller,et al.  Electronic Health Records , 2014, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[5]  Dimitra I. Petrakaki,et al.  Implementation and adoption of nationwide electronic health records in secondary care in England: qualitative analysis of interim results from a prospective national evaluation , 2010, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[6]  A. Skuse,et al.  Pregnant women's use of information and communications technologies to access pregnancy-related health information in South Australia. , 2013, Australian journal of primary health.

[7]  H. Dickhaus,et al.  Classification of Sleep Stages Using Multi-wavelet Time Frequency Entropy and LDA , 2010, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[8]  J Draper,et al.  Should women carry their antenatal records? , 1986, British medical journal.

[9]  J Webster,et al.  Sharing Antenatal Care: Client Satisfaction and Use of the ‘Patient‐held Record’ , 1996, The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology.

[10]  K. Mahomed,et al.  Home-Based Mother's Record: Operational Feasibility, Understanding and Usage in a Rural Community in Zimbabwe , 2000, Tropical doctor.

[11]  A Lovell,et al.  The St. Thomas's Hospital maternity case notes study: a randomised controlled trial to assess the effects of giving expectant mothers their own maternity case notes. , 1987, Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology.

[12]  Rebekah L. Gardner,et al.  Beyond the focus group: understanding physicians' barriers to electronic medical records. , 2012, Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety.

[13]  M. Patton Qualitative research & evaluation methods , 2002 .

[14]  B. Selwyn,et al.  Evaluation of the home-based maternal record: a WHO collaborative study. , 1993, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[15]  I. Merkatz,et al.  Using an Electronic Medical Record to Improve Communication Within a Prenatal Care Network , 2005, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[16]  Gordon P. Brooks,et al.  Initial Scale Development: Sample Size for Pilot Studies , 2010 .

[17]  S. Hamilton Obstetric record card for use in general practice. , 1956, The Practitioner.

[18]  D Elbourne,et al.  The Newbury Maternity Care Study: a randomized controlled trial to assess a policy of women holding their own obstetric records , 1987, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[19]  H. Phipps,et al.  Carrying their own medical records: the perspective of pregnant women , 2001, The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology.

[20]  Tina Janamian,et al.  In a maternity shared-care environment, what do we know about the paper hand-held and electronic health record: a systematic literature review , 2014, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.

[21]  David Chan,et al.  Access to web-based personalized antenatal health records for pregnant women: a randomized controlled trial. , 2008, Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada : JOGC = Journal d'obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada : JOGC.

[22]  Juozas Kurmanavicius,et al.  Notes on a stick: use and acceptability of woman-held maternity notes. , 2010, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[23]  Trisha Greenhalgh,et al.  How to read a paper: Papers that go beyond numbers (qualitative research) , 1997 .

[24]  Donald W. Miller,et al.  Prenatal care: a strategic first step toward EMR acceptance. , 2003, Journal of healthcare information management : JHIM.

[25]  Claudia Pagliari,et al.  Potential of electronic personal health records , 2007, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[26]  Donald W. Miller Using an electronic medical record to improve communication within a prenatal care network. , 2005, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[27]  K. Howell An Introduction to the Philosophy of Methodology , 2012 .

[28]  J. Turner,et al.  Birth in the 21st century. Notes from a visit to the New Aquatic Maternity Centre, Ostend, Belgium. , 2000, Midwifery today with international midwife.

[29]  P. Liamputtong Qualitative Research Methods , 2005 .

[30]  A. Hoerbst,et al.  Electronic Health Records , 2010, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[31]  C. Homer,et al.  The Introduction of a Woman‐Held Record into a Hospital Antenatal Clinic: The Bring Your Own Records Study , 1999, The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology.