Relation of cue to consequence in avoidance learning
暂无分享,去创建一个
An audiovisual stimulus was made contingent upon the rat’s licking at the water spout, thus making it analogous with a gustatory stimulus. When the audiovisual stimulus and the gustatory stimulus were paired with electric shock the avoidance reactions transferred to the audiovisual stimulus, but not the gustatory stimulus. Conversely, when both stimuli were paired with toxin or x-ray the avoidance reactions transferred to the gustatory stimulus, but not the audiovisual stimulus. Apparently stimuli are selected as cues dependent upon the nature of the subsequent reinforcer.
[1] I. Krechevsky. Hereditary nature of "hypotheses." , 1933 .
[2] S. A. Barnett,et al. The Rat: A Study in Behavior. , 1977 .
[3] M. Nachman. Learned aversion to the taste of lithium chloride and generalization to other salts. , 1963, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.
[4] R. A. Koelling,et al. A comparison of aversions induced by x-rays, toxins, and drugs in the rat. , 1967, Radiation research. Supplement.