Innovation Pathways in Bureaucratic Organizations: A Process Study of Technology Infusion at NASA

This paper uses a longitudinal case study of the infusion of new infrared sensor technology at NASA to illustrate limitations of current conceptual models of the innovation process in large bureaucratic organizations. Based on in-depth interviews with key participants, supplemented by a review of project reports, contract archives, publications and press coverage, the paper constructs a detailed process history of the multi-decade "innovation pathway" taken by the new sensor as it was matured from initial demonstration of the relevant scientific phenomena (conceptualization) through implementation on an earth observation satellite (actualization). This case illustrates that maturity is not always a monotonically increasing attribute of the technology, as assumed in current practice; it also explains how informal mechanisms (e.g., personal relationships) can serve as important enablers of transitions among different phases of the formal technology development process. Implications of these findings are discussed and a strategy for a more targeted follow-on study is outlined.

[1]  Richard P. Hallion,et al.  … the Heavens and the Earth: A Political History of the Space Age by Walter A. McDougall (review) , 2023 .

[2]  Robert A. Burgelman.  Strategy as Vector and the Inertia of Coevolutionary Lock-in , 2002 .

[3]  Richard E. Stockwell,et al.  The weapons acquisition process: An economic analysis , 1963 .

[4]  John Preston,et al.  Winning at New Products , 1988 .

[5]  H. Greve.  Exploration and exploitation in product innovation , 2007 .

[6]  John M. Logsdon.  The Decision to Go to the Moon: Project Apollo and the National Interest , 1970 .

[7]  L Leiserson,et al.  Project hindsight. , 1967, Science.

[8]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning , 2007 .

[9]  nasa,et al.  NASA Systems Engineering Handbook , 2007 .

[10]  H. Sapolsky.  The Polaris System Development: Bureaucratic and Programmatic Success in Government , 1972 .

[11]  Merton J. Peck,et al.  The weapons acquisition process: An economic analysis , 1964 .

[12]  A. Langley.  Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data , 1999 .

[13]  T. Allen.  Managing the flow of technology , 1977 .

[14]  Walter Adams,et al.  The Military-Industrial Complex: A Market Structure Analysis , 1972 .

[15]  Shelford Bidwell,et al.  The sources of military doctrine: France, Britain, and Germany between the world wars , 1986 .

[16]  M. Tushman,et al.  Ambidexterity as a Dynamic Capability: Resolving the Innovator's Dilemma , 2007 .

[17]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  The interplay between exploration and exploitation. , 2006 .

[18]  Mary J. Benner,et al.  Exploitation, Exploration, and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited , 2003 .

[19]  M. Tushman,et al.  Ambidexterity as a Dynamic Capability: Resolving the Innovator's Dilemma , 2007 .

[20]  A. Langley,et al.  A PROCESS STUDY OF NEW TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION IN SMALLER MANUFACTURING FIRMS , 1994 .

[21]  Lawrence B. Mohr,et al.  Explaining organizational behavior , 1982 .

[22]  John W. Kingdon.  Agendas, alternatives, and public policies , 1984 .

[23]  P. Hall.  Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences: ALIGNING ONTOLOGY AND METHODOLOGY IN COMPARATIVE POLITICS , 2003 .

[24]  Zoe Szajnfarber,et al.  Stitching the Patchwork Quilt: Integrating the Diverse Literatures Relevant to Complex Product Innovation in a Government Monospony , 2009 .

[25]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[26]  Tim Büthe,et al.  Taking Temporality Seriously: Modeling History and the Use of Narratives as Evidence , 2002, American Political Science Review.

[27]  Murzy D. Jhabvala,et al.  QWIP-based thermal infrared sensor for the Landsat Data Continuity Mission , 2009 .

[28]  A. Pettigrew.  Longitudinal Field Research on Change: Theory and Practice , 1990 .

[29]  T. Higgins.  Book reviewSystems engineering handbook: edited by R. E. Machol, W. P. Tanner, Jr., and S. N. Alexander. 1054 pages, diagrams, illustr., New York, McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1965. Price, $29.50 , 1966 .

[30]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[31]  Jon R. Lindsay.  War Upon the Map: The Politics of Military User Innovation , 2006 .

[32]  C. Wessner.  SBIR and the Phase III Challenge of Commercialization: Report of a Symposium , 2007 .

[33]  William Wunderle,et al.  Winning the Next War , 2008 .

[34]  Leonard E. Miller,et al.  NASA systems engineering handbook , 1995 .

[35]  Brian Sauser,et al.  A Systems Approach to Expanding the Technology Readiness Level within Defense Acquisition , 2008 .

[36]  Rosa Oppenheim,et al.  Winning at New Products , 1990 .