When the Brain Decides

Humans can make fast and highly efficient decisions by using simple heuristics that are assumed to exploit basic cognitive functions. In the study reported here, we used event-related potentials (ERPs) to disclose the psychological mechanisms underlying one of the most frugal decision rules, namely, the recognition heuristic. According to this heuristic, whenever two objects have to be ranked by a specific criterion and only one object is recognized, the recognized object is ranked higher than the unrecognized object. Using a standard recognition-heuristic paradigm, we predicted participants’ decisions by analyzing an ERP correlate of familiarity-based recognition occurring 300 to 450 ms after stimulus onset. The measure remained a significant predictor even when later ERP correlates were taken into account. These findings are evidence for the thesis that simple heuristics exploit basic cognitive processes. Specifically, the findings show that familiarity—that is, recognition in the absence of recollection—contributes to decisions made on the basis of such heuristics.

[1]  A. Mecklinger,et al.  Intra- and Inter-Item Associations Doubly Dissociate the Electrophysiological Correlates of Familiarity and Recollection , 2006, Neuron.

[2]  Hiroki R. Hayama,et al.  Electrophysiological dissociation of the neural correlates of recollection and familiarity , 2006, Brain Research.

[3]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  The recognition heuristic: A decade of research , 2011, Judgment and Decision Making.

[4]  G. Gigerenzer On Narrow Norms and Vague Heuristics: A Reply to Kahneman and Tversky (1996) , 1996 .

[5]  A. Yonelinas The Nature of Recollection and Familiarity: A Review of 30 Years of Research , 2002 .

[6]  P. Todd,et al.  Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart , 1999 .

[7]  Lael J. Schooler,et al.  Why You Think Milan is Larger than Modena: Neural Correlates of the Recognition Heuristic , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[8]  S. Broyles,et al.  Regression coefficient analysis for correlated binomial outcomes , 2000 .

[9]  Christian Frings,et al.  Who will win Wimbledon? The recognition heuristic in predicting sports events , 2006 .

[10]  Ehren L. Newman,et al.  Moderate excitation leads to weakening of perceptual representations. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[11]  Michael D. Rugg,et al.  Dissociation of the neural correlates of implicit and explicit memory , 1998, Nature.

[12]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  Models of ecological rationality: the recognition heuristic. , 2002, Psychological review.

[13]  Julian N. Marewski,et al.  The recognition heuristic in memory‐based inference: is recognition a non‐compensatory cue? , 2008 .

[14]  E. Wilding In what way does the parietal ERP old/new effect index recollection? , 2000, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[15]  M. Rugg,et al.  Event-related potentials and recognition memory , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[16]  M. Rugg,et al.  Separating the Brain Regions Involved in Recollection and Familiarity in Recognition Memory , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  H. Eichenbaum,et al.  The medial temporal lobe and recognition memory. , 2007, Annual review of neuroscience.

[18]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  Heuristic decision making. , 2011, Annual review of psychology.

[19]  D Kahneman,et al.  On the reality of cognitive illusions. , 1996, Psychological review.

[20]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  Can ignorance beat the stock market , 1999 .