Sex differences in proximal humeral outline shape: elliptical Fourier functions.

A method is presented for the numerical analysis of sex differences in size and shape of the proximal humeral outlines using elliptical Fourier functions (EFFs). A skeletal sample consisting of right and left humeri pairs of 69 individuals, 36 males and 33 females, was used. The proximal superior view in the plane of the proximo-distal axis of each humerus was photographed and then 54 boundary points were located on the two-dimensional outline tracings. These points were digitized and used to compute EFFs with 27 harmonics. From the EFFs, a set of expected points on the proximal humeral outline was generated using the centroid as an origin. Superimposition of the male and female outlines on this centroid provided a detailed picture of the relative sex differences in size and shape with respect to that center. The bounded area of the proximal humeral outline showed statistically significant sex differences. Additionally, statistical results of the amplitudes derived from the "area-standardized" EFFs and visual assessments of the mean outline plots indicated significant sex differences in shape of the proximal humeral outlines. Focusing on localized regional differences, the greater tubercle was located more postero-medially and the lesser tubercle was located more anteriorly in the males compared to the females. Sex determinations from the proximal humeri were also examined with discriminant functions based on the amplitudes, which represent shape characteristics of the outline, and the hounded area. Using a cross-validation method, predictions of the percentages of cases correctly classified with the discriminant functions were ranged from 92.8% to 95.7% for the right and left humeral data. These results suggest that differences in size and shape of the proximal humeral outlines may be better predictors of sex when compared with conventional measurements of the humerus.

[1]  S. Collier Sexual dimorphism in relation to big-game hunting and economy in modern human populations. , 1993, American journal of physical anthropology.

[2]  J. Saunders,et al.  Observations of the Function of the Shoulder Joint , 1996, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[3]  S. Ferson,et al.  Measuring shape variation of two-dimensional outlines , 1985 .

[4]  F. P. Schulter-Ellis,et al.  Determination of sex with a discriminant analysis of new pelvic bone measurements: Part II. , 1985, Journal of forensic sciences.

[5]  T. Holland Sex assessment using the proximal tibia. , 1991, American journal of physical anthropology.

[6]  J V Taylor,et al.  Multiple discriminant function analysis of sex and race in the postcranial skeleton. , 1983, American journal of physical anthropology.

[7]  V F Ferrario,et al.  Fourier analysis of human soft tissue facial shape: sex differences in normal adults. , 1995, Journal of anatomy.

[8]  C. Giardina,et al.  Accuracy of curve approximation by harmonically related vectors with elliptical loci , 1977 .

[9]  F. P. Schulter-Ellis,et al.  Determination of sex by discriminant function analysis of postcranial skeletal measurements. , 1979, Journal of forensic sciences.

[10]  J. Arsuaga,et al.  Multivariate analysis of the sexual dimorphism of the hip bone in a modern human population and in early hominids. , 1994, American journal of physical anthropology.

[11]  H. Takayama An Examination of Photographic Measurement in Craniology , 1980 .

[12]  Charles R. Giardina,et al.  Elliptic Fourier features of a closed contour , 1982, Comput. Graph. Image Process..

[13]  K. An,et al.  Dynamic anterior stabilisers of the shoulder with the arm in abduction. , 1994, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[14]  M. Inoue Fourier analysis of the forehead shape of skull and sex determination by use of computer. , 1990, Forensic science international.

[15]  K. An,et al.  Stabilising function of the biceps in stable and unstable shoulders. , 1993, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[16]  Poppen Nk,et al.  Forces at the glenohumeral joint in abduction. , 1978 .

[17]  D. G. Steele,et al.  The estimation of sex on the basis of the talus and calcaneus. , 1976, American journal of physical anthropology.

[18]  Hideyuki Tanaka Numerical analysis of the proximal humeral outline: Bilateral shape differences , 1999, American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council.

[19]  Lestrel Pe Some approaches toward the mathematical modeling of the craniofacial complex. , 1989 .

[20]  F. Rohlf,et al.  A COMPARISON OF FOURIER METHODS FOR THE DESCRIPTION OF WING SHAPE IN MOSQUITOES (DIPTERA: CULICIDAE) , 1984 .

[21]  D. Holman,et al.  Determination of sex from arm bone measurements. , 1991, American journal of physical anthropology.

[22]  P. Lestrel,et al.  Longitudinal study of cranial base shape changes in Macaca nemestrina. , 1993, American journal of physical anthropology.

[23]  P. Lestrel Method for analyzing complex two‐dimensional forms: Elliptical Fourier functions , 1989, American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council.

[24]  D. V. Gerven,et al.  The contribution of size and shape variation to patterns of sexual dimorphism of the human femur , 1972 .

[25]  F. Prior,et al.  Size and shape of the hominoid distal femur: fourier analysis. , 1977, American journal of physical anthropology.

[26]  M Y Işcan,et al.  Sex determination from the tibia: standards for contemporary Japan. , 1994, Journal of forensic sciences.