Plagiarism, cultural diversity and metaphor—implications for academic staff development

Plagiarism is a complex, culturally loaded concept which causes much anxiety for both academics and students. Exactly what constitutes plagiarism is dependent on a number of contextual factors. Despite the difficulties associated with defining and detecting plagiarism, it is said to be on the increase, and students from ‘other cultures’ are frequently highlighted as being perpetrators of this crime against the academic community of enlightened Western scholars. Metaphors of war and battle are common in the discourse of plagiarism which also has clear links to the discourse of Orientalism as described by Edward Said. The paper argues that it is time to change the metaphor and to see teaching to avoid plagiarism as an intercultural encounter rather than a battle that needs to be won. It discusses the implications of viewing plagiarism as a culturally constructed concept and describes four Focus Areas for academic staff development designed to create an academic culture that deters plagiarism by encouraging recognition of and engagement with cultural diversity.

[1]  J. Gundara.  Interculturalism, Education and Inclusion , 2000 .

[2]  A. Lathrop,et al.  Student Cheating and Plagiarism in the Internet Era: A Wake-Up Call , 2000 .

[3]  Ruth Vinz,et al.  On Writing Qualitative Research: Living by Words , 1997 .

[4]  J. Bessant.  Dawkins' Higher Education Reforms and How Metaphors Work in Policy Making , 2002 .

[5]  J. Bianco,et al.  Striving for the third place: intercultural competence through language education , 1999 .

[6]  Kate Cadman,et al.  Writing and Identity. The Discoursal Construction of Identity in Academic Writing: Roz Ivanic. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1998. ISBN: 90 272 1798 X (Eur) /1-556 19-323-8 (US) , 2002 .

[7]  K. Rajagopalan.  English and the discourses of colonialism , 1999 .

[8]  D. Bligh.  Learning to teach in higher education , 1993 .

[9]  A. Liddicoat,et al.  Striving for Third Place: Consequences and Implications , 1999 .

[10]  A. Pennycook.  Borrowing Others' Words: Text, Ownership, Memory, and Plagiarism , 1996 .

[11]  N. Fairclough.  Discourse and social change , 1992 .

[12]  M. Foucault.  The archaeology of knowledge , 1970 .

[13]  Ron Scollon,et al.  Plagiarism and ideology: Identity in intercultural discourse , 1995, Language in Society.

[14]  Critical Enquiry.,et al.  Before we hand that highwayman - the LAS advisers' perspective on plagiarism. , 2003 .

[15]  Glenn D. Deckert.  Perspectives on Plagiarism from ESL Students in Hong Kong. , 1993 .

[16]  S. J. Davis,et al.  Teaching Practices That Encourage or Eliminate Student Plagiarism. , 1994 .

[17]  S. Volet,et al.  Common misconceptions about students from South‐East Asia studying in Australia , 1997 .

[18]  Lenora C. Thompson,et al.  But I Changed Three Words! Plagiarism in the ESL Classroom. , 1995 .

[19]  G. Gutting.  The archaeology of knowledge , 1989 .

[20]  Richard G. Harris,et al.  Anti-Plagiarism Strategies for Research Papers , 2002 .

[21]  Tak Shing Ha,et al.  Borderless Education and Teaching and Learning Cultures: The Case of Hong Kong , 1998 .

[22]  Yaying Zhang.  English and the Discourses of Colonialism , 2002 .

[23]  Janette Ryan,et al.  A Guide to Teaching International Students , 1999 .

[24]  R. Ivanič.  Writing and identity , 1998 .