Local Nash Equilibrium in Social Networks

Nash equilibrium is widely present in various social disputes. As of now, in structured static populations, such as social networks, regular, and random graphs, the discussions on Nash equilibrium are quite limited. In a relatively stable static gaming network, a rational individual has to comprehensively consider all his/her opponents' strategies before they adopt a unified strategy. In this scenario, a new strategy equilibrium emerges in the system. We define this equilibrium as a local Nash equilibrium. In this paper, we present an explicit definition of the local Nash equilibrium for the two-strategy games in structured populations. Based on the definition, we investigate the condition that a system reaches the evolutionary stable state when the individuals play the Prisoner's dilemma and snow-drift game. The local Nash equilibrium provides a way to judge whether a gaming structured population reaches the evolutionary stable state on one hand. On the other hand, it can be used to predict whether cooperators can survive in a system long before the system reaches its evolutionary stable state for the Prisoner's dilemma game. Our work therefore provides a theoretical framework for understanding the evolutionary stable state in the gaming populations with static structures.

[1]  G. Szabó,et al.  Cooperation enhanced by inhomogeneous activity of teaching for evolutionary Prisoner's Dilemma games , 2006, q-bio/0610001.

[2]  C. Hauert,et al.  Models of cooperation based on the Prisoner's Dilemma and the Snowdrift game , 2005 .

[3]  M. A. Aziz-Alaoui,et al.  Fence-sitters Protect Cooperation in Complex Networks , 2013, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[4]  J M Smith,et al.  Evolution and the theory of games , 1976 .

[5]  Rense Corten,et al.  Game Theory Evolving: A Problem-Centered Introduction to Modeling Strategic Interaction (Second Edition) by Herbert Gintis , 2009, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[6]  Robert C. Wolpert,et al.  A Review of the , 1985 .

[7]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Statistical mechanics of complex networks , 2001, ArXiv.

[8]  Francisco C. Santos,et al.  How selection pressure changes the nature of social dilemmas in structured populations , 2012 .

[9]  M. A. Aziz-Alaoui,et al.  Emergence of Cooperation in Non-scale-free Networks , 2014, ArXiv.

[10]  J Gómez-Gardeñes,et al.  Dynamical organization of cooperation in complex topologies. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[11]  S. N. Dorogovtsev,et al.  Evolution of networks , 2001, cond-mat/0106144.

[12]  Dirk Semmann Conditional cooperation can hinder network reciprocity , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  C. Hauert,et al.  Evolutionary games and population dynamics: maintenance of cooperation in public goods games , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[14]  J. Nash Equilibrium Points in N-Person Games. , 1950, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  F. C. Santos,et al.  Scale-free networks provide a unifying framework for the emergence of cooperation. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[16]  Acknowledgments , 2006, Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology.

[17]  M. Perc,et al.  Towards effective payoffs in the prisoner’s dilemma game on scale-free networks , 2007, 0711.4028.

[18]  Martin T. Dove Structure and Dynamics , 2003 .

[19]  W. Hamilton,et al.  The evolution of cooperation. , 1984, Science.

[20]  M. Nowak,et al.  Evolutionary games and spatial chaos , 1992, Nature.

[21]  Michael Doebeli,et al.  Spatial structure often inhibits the evolution of cooperation in the snowdrift game , 2004, Nature.

[22]  Helen Henshaw,et al.  Application of health behaviour theory to hearing healthcare research: The state of play and beyond , 2016, International journal of audiology.

[23]  G. Szabó,et al.  Evolutionary games on graphs , 2006, cond-mat/0607344.

[24]  Herbert Gintis,et al.  Game Theory Evolving: A Problem-Centered Introduction to Modeling Strategic Interaction - Second Edition , 2009 .

[25]  Hugh Ward Game Theory and the Politics of Global Warming: The State of Play and beyond , 1996 .

[26]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Coevolutionary Games - A Mini Review , 2009, Biosyst..

[27]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Evolutionary dynamics of group interactions on structured populations: a review , 2013, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[28]  Paul E. Turner,et al.  Prisoner's dilemma in an RNA virus , 1999, Nature.

[29]  Martin A. Nowak,et al.  Evolutionary dynamics on graphs , 2005, Nature.

[30]  J. Hofbauer,et al.  Evolutionary game dynamics , 2011 .

[31]  K. Schlag Why Imitate, and If So, How?, : A Boundedly Rational Approach to Multi-armed Bandits , 1998 .

[32]  P. Taylor,et al.  Evolutionarily Stable Strategies and Game Dynamics , 1978 .

[33]  A. I.,et al.  Neural Field Continuum Limits and the Structure–Function Partitioning of Cognitive–Emotional Brain Networks , 2023, Biology.

[34]  Shilpa Chakravartula,et al.  Complex Networks: Structure and Dynamics , 2014 .

[35]  Mike Mesterton-Gibbons,et al.  Genetic and cultural evolution of cooperation , 2004 .

[36]  F. C. Santos,et al.  A new route to the evolution of cooperation , 2006, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[37]  F C Santos,et al.  Epidemic spreading and cooperation dynamics on homogeneous small-world networks. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[38]  H. Ohtsuki,et al.  A simple rule for the evolution of cooperation on graphs and social networks , 2006, Nature.

[39]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  The Structure and Function of Complex Networks , 2003, SIAM Rev..

[40]  J. Cuesta,et al.  Heterogeneous networks do not promote cooperation when humans play a Prisoner’s Dilemma , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[41]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[42]  F. C. Santos,et al.  Evolutionary dynamics of social dilemmas in structured heterogeneous populations. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[43]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[44]  M. A. O. Ignacio,et al.  How to cite this article , 2016 .

[45]  Steven D. Levitt,et al.  Testing Mixed-Strategy Equilibria When Players Are Heterogeneous: The Case of Penalty Kicks in Soccer , 2002 .

[46]  R. Axelrod More Effective Choice in the Prisoner's Dilemma , 1980 .