Highway Vehicle Emissions Avoided by Diesel Passenger Rail Service Based on Real-World Data

Avoided emissions attributable to the reduction in personal automobile trips for passenger rail riders are quantified based on real-world measurements. The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) sponsors the Piedmont passenger rail service between Raleigh and Charlotte, NC. Per passenger-kilometer locomotive emissions were quantified based on portable emissions measurement system measured exhaust concentrations and duty cycles, or the fraction of trip time spent in each throttle notch setting of the prime mover engine, from 68 one-way trips of six Tier 0+ and Tier 1+ locomotives, and actual ridership data. Motor Vehicle Emissions Simulator (MOVES) software was used to estimate light-duty gasoline vehicle (LDGV) emission factors. Moving a passenger from an LDGV to a Piedmont train would lead to a net reduction in carbon dioxide (CO2) and carbon monoxide (CO) emissions by 44–94 %, respectively, between Raleigh and Charlotte, based on the assumption that the driver is the only LDGV passenger. However, locomotive nitrogen oxides (NOx), hydrocarbons (HC), and particulate matter (PM) emission factors were 4–11 times higher than for the LDGV, respectively. Delays for either the train or highway vehicles did not substantially alter the key findings. If a Tier 4 locomotive was used, NOx, PM, and HC emission rates would be 90–99 % lower than current NCDOT locomotives. The use of real-world data representative of actual train operations provides an accurate basis for comparing rail and personal vehicle energy use and emissions and for identifying key factors affecting variability in the comparison.

[1]  Thomas W. Kirchstetter,et al.  Measurement of black carbon emissions from in-use diesel-electric passenger locomotives in California , 2015 .

[2]  Paul Komor Reducing energy use in US freight transport , 1995 .

[3]  H Christopher Frey,et al.  On-Road Measurement of Vehicle Tailpipe Emissions Using a Portable Instrument , 2003, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[4]  A. Horvath,et al.  Evaluation of life-cycle air emission factors of freight transportation. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[5]  Ps Analytical Ltd,et al.  Environmental Technology Verification Report , 2001 .

[6]  H. Frey,et al.  Effects of Errors on Vehicle Emission Rates from Portable Emissions Measurement Systems , 2013 .

[7]  H. Christopher Frey,et al.  Comparison of Locomotive Emissions Measured during Dynamometer versus Rail Yard Engine Load Tests , 2013 .

[8]  M. Vojtíšek-Lom,et al.  Vehicle mass emissions measurements using a portable 5-gas exhaust analyzer and engine computer data , 2009 .

[9]  Nagui M. Rouphail,et al.  Effect of Arterial Signalization and Level of Service on Measured Vehicle Emissions , 2003 .

[10]  Arpad Horvath,et al.  Environmental Assessment of Freight Transportation in the U.S. (11 pp) , 2006 .

[11]  Nam Seok Kim,et al.  Assessment of CO2 emissions for truck-only and rail-based intermodal freight systems in Europe , 2009 .

[12]  Matthew Barth,et al.  Emissions Analysis of Southern California Metrolink Commuter Rail , 1996 .

[13]  Robert Dunn,et al.  Influence of Duty Cycles and Fleet Profile on Emissions From Locomotives in Canada , 2002 .

[14]  Alexander Kolb,et al.  Calculation of energy consumption and pollutant emissions on freight transport routes , 1995 .

[15]  H. Frey,et al.  Fuel use and emissions comparisons for alternative routes, time of day, road grade, and vehicles based on in-use measurements. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[16]  A. Horvath,et al.  Life-cycle assessment of high-speed rail: the case of California , 2010 .

[17]  Matthew Barth,et al.  EMISSIONS COMPARISON BETWEEN TRUCK AND RAIL: CASE STUDY OF CALIFORNIA I-40 , 1996 .

[18]  Stephen G. Ritchie,et al.  Air Pollution Impacts of Shifting Freight from Truck to Rail at California's San Pedro Bay Ports , 2010 .

[19]  A. Horvath,et al.  High-speed rail with emerging automobiles and aircraft can reduce environmental impacts in California’s future , 2012 .

[20]  H. Frey,et al.  Variability in Light-Duty Gasoline Vehicle Emission Factors from Trip-Based Real-World Measurements. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[21]  Mark A. Delucchi EMISSIONS OF CRITERIA POLLUTANTS, TOXIC AIR POLLUTANTS AND GREENHOUSE GASES FROM THE USE OF ALTERNATIVE TRANSPORTATION MODES AND FUELS. , 1996 .

[22]  Daniel A. Burgard,et al.  Spectroscopy Applied to On-Road Mobile Source Emissions , 2006, Applied spectroscopy.

[23]  H. Christopher Frey,et al.  Comparison of Over-the-Rail and Rail Yard Measurements of Diesel Locomotives. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[24]  H. Christopher Frey,et al.  Portable Emission Measurement System for Emissions of Passenger Rail Locomotives , 2012 .

[25]  M. Vojtíšek-Lom,et al.  Development Of Heavy-Duty Diesel Portable, On-Board Mass Exhaust Emissions Monitoring System With NOx, CO2 And Qualitative PM Capabilities , 2001 .