Development of a Portable Device for Urodynamic Data Acquisition Suitable for Home Use

[1]  M. Skubic,et al.  Senior residents’ perceived need of and preferences for “smart home” sensor technologies , 2008, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[2]  J. G. Evans,et al.  Oxford textbook of geriatric medicine , 2000 .

[3]  S. Shiffman,et al.  Patient non-compliance with paper diaries , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[4]  S. Doumouchtsis,et al.  Fundamentals of urodynamic practice, based on International Continence Society good urodynamic practices recommendations , 2018, Neurourology and urodynamics.

[5]  A. Gammie,et al.  The fundamentals of uroflowmetry practice, based on International Continence Society good urodynamic practices recommendations , 2018, Neurourology and urodynamics.

[6]  M. Damaser,et al.  Ambulatory urodynamic monitoring: state of the art and future directions , 2019, Nature Reviews Urology.

[7]  M. Emberton,et al.  A systematic review of the reliability of frequency‐volume charts in urological research and its implications for the optimum chart duration , 2007, BJU international.

[8]  Andrew Gammie,et al.  International continence society guidelines on urodynamic equipment performance , 2014, Neurourology and urodynamics.

[9]  S. Baraković,et al.  Smart Ageing: Are We Succeeding? , 2019, IFMBE Proceedings.

[10]  Hashim Hashim,et al.  International Continence Society Good Urodynamic Practices and Terms 2016: Urodynamics, uroflowmetry, cystometry, and pressure‐flow study , 2017, Neurourology and urodynamics.

[11]  S. Colman,et al.  A validated patient reported measure of urinary urgency severity in overactive bladder for use in clinical trials. , 2005, The Journal of urology.

[12]  John G. Webster,et al.  Critical Review of Uroflowmetry Methods , 2018 .

[13]  Shaun Wen Huey Lee,et al.  The global burden of lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia: A systematic review and meta-analysis , 2017, Scientific Reports.