An optical comparison of silicone and EVA encapsulants under various spectra

Under the AM1–5g spectrum, the efficiency of a c-Si module can be increased by 0.5–1.5% (relative) by using a silicone encapsulant rather than EVA. This increase is primarily due to photons of wavelengths less than ∼400 nm being transmitted by silicone but blocked by EVA. The highest increase in efficiency arises for cells with a good ‘blue response’ and for silicones of a higher refractive index. In this work we show that when calculated for the AM1–5g spectrum, the optical advantage of silicone over EVA tends to be an underestimate of what can be expected in the field. This is because incident spectra are frequently ‘bluer’ than the AM1–5g spectrum, particularly in summer and on cloudy days. In such cases, a larger fraction of photons have a wavelength less than 400 nm. With ray tracing, we find that the relative advantage of silicone over EVA is increased by an additional 0.3% on a sunny summer day in Phoenix AZ, and by 0.7% on a cloudy summer day in Brownsville TX. Still greater increases are expected for maritime climates and for installations with high albedo.

[1]  Nick E. Powell,et al.  Improved spectral response of silicone encapsulanted photovoltaic modules , 2010, 2010 35th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference.

[2]  Giso Hahn,et al.  Increased internal quantum efficiency of encapsulated solar cells by using two-component silicone as encapsulant material , 2008 .

[3]  J. A. del Cueto,et al.  Investigating the seasonal performance of amorphous silicon single- and multi-junction modules , 2003, 3rd World Conference onPhotovoltaic Energy Conversion, 2003. Proceedings of.

[4]  Nick E. Powell,et al.  An optical comparison of silicone and EVA encapsulants for conventional silicon PV modules: A ray-tracing study , 2009, 2009 34th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC).

[5]  Michael D. Kempe,et al.  Accelerated UV test methods and selection criteria for encapsulants of photovoltaic modules , 2008, 2008 33rd IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference.

[6]  Ann Walstrom Norris,et al.  The effect of damp‐heat and UV aging tests on the optical properties of silicone and EVA encapsulants , 2011 .

[7]  Ann Walstrom Norris,et al.  The effect of accelerated aging tests on the optical properties of silicone and EVA encapsulants , 2009 .

[8]  Takashi Minemoto,et al.  Impact of spectral irradiance distribution and temperature on the outdoor performance of amorphous Si photovoltaic modules , 2007 .

[9]  B. Marion,et al.  Validation of a Photovoltaic Module Energy Ratings Procedure at NREL , 1999 .

[10]  C. Bohren Atmospheric Optics , 2003 .

[11]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[12]  Ann Walstrom Norris,et al.  Silicones for Photovoltaic Encapsulation , 2008 .

[13]  R. M. Swanson,et al.  MANUFACTURE OF SOLAR CELLS WITH 21% EFFICIENCY , 2004 .

[14]  Keith Emery,et al.  Spectral effects on PV-device rating , 1992 .

[15]  S. Nann,et al.  Solar spectral irradiance under clear and cloudy skies : measurements and a semiempirical model , 1991 .