Vulvovaginal Symptoms in Women With Bacterial Vaginosis

OBJECTIVE: A substantial, but highly variable, percentage of women with bacterial vaginosis are said to be asymptomatic. The purpose of this study was to estimate the prevalence of symptoms among women with bacterial vaginosis compared with women without bacterial vaginosis by direct, explicit, and detailed questioning of these women. METHODS: Women presenting for a routine health care visit at 12 health department clinics in Birmingham, Alabama, were recruited to participate in a longitudinal study of vaginal flora. At the first visit, they underwent a pelvic examination, lower genital tract microbiological evaluation, and an interview that included detailed questions regarding lower genital tract symptoms. The prevalence of symptoms among women with and without bacterial vaginosis (Gram stain score 7 or higher) was compared. RESULTS: Among 2,888 women without gonorrhea, Chlamydia, or trichomonas, 75% of women with and 82% of women without bacterial vaginosis never noted any vaginal odor in the past 6 months (P < .001). The corresponding values were 63% and 65% for never noting vaginal “wetness” (P = .02); 58% and 57% for vaginal discharge (P = .65); 91% and 86% for irritation (P = .004); 88% and 85% for itching (P = .64); and 96% and 94% for dysuria (P = .002), respectively. Cumulatively, 58% of women with bacterial vaginosis noted odor, discharge, and/or wetness in the past 6 months compared with 57% of women without bacterial vaginosis (P = .70). CONCLUSION: The 2 classic symptoms of bacterial vaginosis discharge and odor are each reported by a minority of women with bacterial vaginosis and are only slightly more prevalent than among women without bacterial vaginosis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-3

[1]  C. Boyer,et al.  Bacterial Vaginosis in Sexually Experienced and Non–Sexually Experienced Young Women Entering the Military , 2003, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[2]  F. Khatun,et al.  Prevalence of selected reproductive tract infections among pregnant women attending an urban maternal and childcare unit in Dhaka, Bangladesh. , 2003, Journal of health, population, and nutrition.

[3]  D. Hellberg,et al.  The diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis and vaginal flora changes , 2001, Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

[4]  P. Nyirjesy Chronic vulvovaginal candidiasis. , 2001, American family physician.

[5]  T. Nansel,et al.  Women's Douching Practices and Related Attitudes: Findings from Four Focus Groups , 2001, Women & health.

[6]  H. Curtis What is normal vaginal flora? , 1997, Genitourinary medicine.

[7]  G. Hill,et al.  The microbiology of bacterial vaginosis. , 1993, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[8]  D. Eschenbach Bacterial vaginosis and anaerobes in obstetric-gynecologic infection. , 1993, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[9]  M A Krohn,et al.  Reliability of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis is improved by a standardized method of gram stain interpretation , 1991, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[10]  K. Holmes,et al.  Diagnosis and clinical manifestations of bacterial vaginosis. , 1988, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[11]  K. Holmes,et al.  Nonspecific vaginitis: Diagnostic criteria and microbial and epidemiologic associations , 1983 .

[12]  J. Dhar,et al.  What is normal vaginal flora? , 1997, British medical journal.