Smart Divert: A New Mars Robotic Entry, Descent, and Landing Architecture

This study investigates the performance and feasibility of a new entry, descent, and landing architecture onMars, termed Smart Divert, for landing in one of a number of small safe zones surrounded by hazardous terrain. Smart Divert consists of a ballistic entry followed by supersonic parachute deployment. After parachute release, the vehicle diverts to one ofmany predefined, fuel-optimal safe zone sites. The Smart Divert concept does not require hypersonic guidance or real-time terrain recognition. Instead, it relies on a priori orbital observations to identify small, multiple safe zones within a larger hazardous region and additional terminal descent propellant to land at the fuel-optimal safe zone.Before launch,mission designers could trade thenumber and size of the safe zones as part of the landing site selection process.Reasonable propellantmass fractions of 0.3 canbe achievedby initiating the divert at 5 kmaltitude, providing a 10 km horizontal divert capability. The number of safe zones is shown to be a function of landing ellipse size. Assuming Mars Science Laboratory state-of-the-art interplanetary navigation, four safe zone sites, randomly placed throughout the landing ellipse to simulate unknowndestinations of futuremissions, require a propellantmass fraction less than 0.3 for 97% of the cases analyzed. The unconstrained optimal arrangement of four safe zone sites within the same landing ellipse reduced the required propellant mass fraction from 0.3 to 0.22. The propellant mass fraction may be further reduced as the number of safe zone sites is increased. An example scenario using rock count data for the Phoenix landing site region demonstrates that Smart Divert can be implemented to land in previously unreachable terrain for a propellant mass fraction of 0.2.

[1]  Gavin Mendeck,et al.  Guidance Design for Mars Smart Landers Using the Entry Terminal Point Controller , 2002 .

[2]  Richard W. Powell,et al.  Systems for pinpoint landing at Mars , 2004 .

[3]  D.S. Adams,et al.  Phoenix Mars Scout Landing Risk Assessment , 2008, 2008 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[4]  Robert D. Braun,et al.  Guidance, Navigation, and Control System Performance Trades for Mars Pinpoint Landing , 2010 .

[5]  Christopher N. D'Souza,et al.  AN OPTIMAL GUIDANCE LAW FOR PLANETARY LANDING , 1997 .

[6]  Robert D. Braun,et al.  Guidance, Navigation, and Control Technology System Trades for Mars Pinpoint Landing , 2008 .

[7]  Robert D. Braun,et al.  Fully-propulsive Mars atmospheric transit strategies for high-mass payload missions , 2009, 2009 IEEE Aerospace conference.

[8]  S. Ploen,et al.  Performance trades for Mars pinpoint landing , 2006, 2006 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[9]  J. Balaram,et al.  Mars Science Laboratory Simulations for Entry, Descent, and Landing , 2006 .

[10]  Cheng-Chih Chu Development of advanced entry, descent, and landing technologies for future Mars missions , 2006, 2006 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[11]  C.D. Epp,et al.  Autonomous Precision Landing and Hazard Detection and Avoidance Technology (ALHAT) , 2007, 2007 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[12]  R. Manning,et al.  Mars Exploration Entry, Descent, and Landing Challenges , 2007 .

[13]  Raymond E. Arvidson,et al.  Phoenix Landing Site Hazard Assessment and Selection , 2009 .

[14]  Larry H. Matthies,et al.  MER-DIMES: a planetary landing application of computer vision , 2005, 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05).

[15]  Raymond E. Arvidson,et al.  Landing Site Dispersion Analysis and Statistical Assessment for the Mars Phoenix Lander , 2008 .