AbDesign: An algorithm for combinatorial backbone design guided by natural conformations and sequences

Computational design of protein function has made substantial progress, generating new enzymes, binders, inhibitors, and nanomaterials not previously seen in nature. However, the ability to design new protein backbones for function—essential to exert control over all polypeptide degrees of freedom—remains a critical challenge. Most previous attempts to design new backbones computed the mainchain from scratch. Here, instead, we describe a combinatorial backbone and sequence optimization algorithm called AbDesign, which leverages the large number of sequences and experimentally determined molecular structures of antibodies to construct new antibody models, dock them against target surfaces and optimize their sequence and backbone conformation for high stability and binding affinity. We used the algorithm to produce antibody designs that target the same molecular surfaces as nine natural, high‐affinity antibodies; in five cases interface sequence identity is above 30%, and in four of those the backbone conformation at the core of the antibody binding surface is within 1 Å root‐mean square deviation from the natural antibodies. Designs recapitulate polar interaction networks observed in natural complexes, and amino acid sidechain rigidity at the designed binding surface, which is likely important for affinity and specificity, is high compared to previous design studies. In designed anti‐lysozyme antibodies, complementarity‐determining regions (CDRs) at the periphery of the interface, such as L1 and H2, show greater backbone conformation diversity than the CDRs at the core of the interface, and increase the binding surface area compared to the natural antibody, potentially enhancing affinity and specificity. Proteins 2015; 83:1385–1406. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  Shira Warszawski,et al.  A “Fuzzy”-Logic Language for Encoding Multiple Physical Traits in Biomolecules , 2014, Journal of molecular biology.

[2]  Costas D. Maranas,et al.  OptMAVEn – A New Framework for the de novo Design of Antibody Variable Region Models Targeting Specific Antigen Epitopes , 2014, PloS one.

[3]  David Baker,et al.  A Computationally Designed Inhibitor of an Epstein-Barr Viral Bcl-2 Protein Induces Apoptosis in Infected Cells , 2014, Cell.

[4]  Samuel L. DeLuca,et al.  Computational design of protein-small molecule interfaces. , 2014, Journal of structural biology.

[5]  Jiye Shi,et al.  SAbDab: the structural antibody database , 2013, Nucleic Acids Res..

[6]  David Baker,et al.  Computational design of a pH-sensitive IgG binding protein , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  Julie C. Mitchell,et al.  Community‐wide evaluation of methods for predicting the effect of mutations on protein–protein interactions , 2013, Proteins.

[8]  D. Baker,et al.  Computational design of a protein-based enzyme inhibitor. , 2013, Journal of molecular biology.

[9]  David Baker,et al.  Computational design of ligand-binding proteins with high affinity and selectivity , 2013, Nature.

[10]  Dan S. Tawfik,et al.  What makes a protein fold amenable to functional innovation? Fold polarity and stability trade-offs. , 2013, Journal of molecular biology.

[11]  U. Baxa,et al.  Structure of RSV Fusion Glycoprotein Trimer Bound to a Prefusion-Specific Neutralizing Antibody , 2013, Science.

[12]  N. Linden,et al.  Self-Assembling Cages from Coiled-Coil Peptide Modules , 2013, Science.

[13]  Ben M. Webb,et al.  Design of a single-chain polypeptide tetrahedron assembled from coiled-coil segments , 2013, Nature chemical biology.

[14]  Sarel J Fleishman,et al.  Emerging themes in the computational design of novel enzymes and protein–protein interfaces , 2013, FEBS letters.

[15]  Nicholas Sawyer,et al.  Protein–protein interactions: General trends in the relationship between binding affinity and interfacial buried surface area , 2013, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[16]  B. Kuhlman,et al.  A comparison of successful and failed protein interface designs highlights the challenges of designing buried hydrogen bonds , 2013, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[17]  David Baker,et al.  Computational design of novel protein binders and experimental affinity maturation. , 2013, Methods in enzymology.

[18]  Jack Snoeyink,et al.  Scientific benchmarks for guiding macromolecular energy function improvement. , 2013, Methods in enzymology.

[19]  Costas D. Maranas,et al.  MAPs: a database of modular antibody parts for predicting tertiary structures and designing affinity matured antibodies , 2013, BMC Bioinformatics.

[20]  Liang Tong,et al.  Computational design of catalytic dyads and oxyanion holes for ester hydrolysis. , 2012, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[21]  D. Burton,et al.  Broadly Neutralizing Antibodies Present New Prospects to Counter Highly Antigenically Diverse Viruses , 2012, Science.

[22]  D. Baker,et al.  Computational Design of Self-Assembling Protein Nanomaterials with Atomic Level Accuracy , 2012, Science.

[23]  Brian Kuhlman,et al.  Structure-based design of supercharged, highly thermoresistant antibodies. , 2012, Chemistry & biology.

[24]  David Baker,et al.  Role of the Biomolecular Energy Gap in Protein Design, Structure, and Evolution , 2012, Cell.

[25]  I. Wilson,et al.  Broadly neutralizing antibodies against influenza virus and prospects for universal therapies. , 2012, Current opinion in virology.

[26]  Bryan S. Der,et al.  Metal-mediated affinity and orientation specificity in a computationally designed protein homodimer. , 2012, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[27]  P. Tessier,et al.  Structure-based design of conformation- and sequence-specific antibodies against amyloid β , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  Brian Kuhlman,et al.  Computational design of a symmetric homodimer using β-strand assembly , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  Kengo Kinoshita,et al.  Community-wide assessment of protein-interface modeling suggests improvements to design methodology. , 2011, Journal of molecular biology.

[30]  David Baker,et al.  Hotspot-centric de novo design of protein binders. , 2011, Journal of molecular biology.

[31]  Brian D. Weitzner,et al.  Benchmarking and Analysis of Protein Docking Performance in Rosetta v3.2 , 2011, PloS one.

[32]  Jens Meiler,et al.  RosettaScripts: A Scripting Language Interface to the Rosetta Macromolecular Modeling Suite , 2011, PloS one.

[33]  Timothy A. Whitehead,et al.  Computational Design of Proteins Targeting the Conserved Stem Region of Influenza Hemagglutinin , 2011, Science.

[34]  David Baker,et al.  A de novo protein binding pair by computational design and directed evolution. , 2011, Molecular cell.

[35]  D. Baker,et al.  Restricted sidechain plasticity in the structures of native proteins and complexes , 2011, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[36]  Roland L. Dunbrack,et al.  A new clustering of antibody CDR loop conformations. , 2011, Journal of molecular biology.

[37]  D. Baker,et al.  Structure-guided forcefield optimization , 2011, Proteins.

[38]  Jens Meiler,et al.  Bcl::Cluster: A method for clustering biological molecules coupled with visualization in the Pymol Molecular Graphics System , 2011, 2011 IEEE 1st International Conference on Computational Advances in Bio and Medical Sciences (ICCABS).

[39]  D. Baker,et al.  Alternate states of proteins revealed by detailed energy landscape mapping. , 2011, Journal of molecular biology.

[40]  C D Maranas,et al.  OptCDR: a general computational method for the design of antibody complementarity determining regions for targeted epitope binding. , 2010, Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS.

[41]  D. Baker,et al.  Elicitation of structure-specific antibodies by epitope scaffolds , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[42]  Jasmine L. Gallaher,et al.  Computational Design of an Enzyme Catalyst for a Stereoselective Bimolecular Diels-Alder Reaction , 2010, Science.

[43]  Thomas Szyperski,et al.  Computational design of a PAK1 binding protein. , 2010, Journal of molecular biology.

[44]  H. Komatsu [Antibody therapy in cancer]. , 2010, Nihon rinsho. Japanese journal of clinical medicine.

[45]  Andreas Lingel,et al.  Hedgehog Pathway Antagonist 5E1 Binds Hedgehog at the Pseudo-active Site , 2010, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[46]  Christian Bailly,et al.  Strategies and challenges for the next generation of therapeutic antibodies , 2010, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[47]  Ning Ma,et al.  BLAST+: architecture and applications , 2009, BMC Bioinformatics.

[48]  D. Kirchhofer,et al.  Unraveling the allosteric mechanism of serine protease inhibition by an antibody. , 2009, Structure.

[49]  Tanja Kortemme,et al.  Computer-aided design of functional protein interactions. , 2009, Nature chemical biology.

[50]  E. Coutsias,et al.  Sub-angstrom accuracy in protein loop reconstruction by robotics-inspired conformational sampling , 2009, Nature Methods.

[51]  Benjamin D. Sellers,et al.  Improving the species cross-reactivity of an antibody using computational design. , 2009, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters.

[52]  A. Biegert,et al.  Sequence context-specific profiles for homology searching , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[53]  L. A. Clark,et al.  An antibody loop replacement design feasibility study and a loop-swapped dimer structure. , 2008, Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS.

[54]  D. Baker,et al.  RosettaHoles: Rapid assessment of protein core packing for structure prediction, refinement, design, and validation , 2008, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[55]  Y. Guan,et al.  Heterosubtypic Neutralizing Monoclonal Antibodies Cross-Protective against H5N1 and H1N1 Recovered from Human IgM+ Memory B Cells , 2008, PloS one.

[56]  Colin A. Smith,et al.  Backrub-like backbone simulation recapitulates natural protein conformational variability and improves mutant side-chain prediction. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.

[57]  Peter Timmerman,et al.  Affinity maturation of antibodies assisted by in silico modeling , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[58]  David Baker,et al.  Macromolecular modeling with rosetta. , 2008, Annual review of biochemistry.

[59]  Sachdev S Sidhu,et al.  Submitting antibodies to binding arbitration. , 2008, Nature chemical biology.

[60]  Stephen L Mayo,et al.  A de novo designed protein–protein interface , 2007, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[61]  Brian Kuhlman,et al.  High-resolution design of a protein loop , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[62]  Bruce Tidor,et al.  Computational design of antibody-affinity improvement beyond in vivo maturation , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.

[63]  D. Filpula Antibody engineering and modification technologies. , 2007, Biomolecular engineering.

[64]  Igor N. Berezovsky,et al.  Positive and Negative Design in Stability and Thermal Adaptation of Natural Proteins , 2006, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[65]  Jens Meiler,et al.  New algorithms and an in silico benchmark for computational enzyme design , 2006, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[66]  M. Luftig,et al.  Structural basis for HIV-1 neutralization by a gp41 fusion intermediate–directed antibody , 2006, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[67]  Woody Sherman,et al.  Affinity enhancement of an in vivo matured therapeutic antibody using structure‐based computational design , 2006, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[68]  Ruth Nussinov,et al.  PatchDock and SymmDock: servers for rigid and symmetric docking , 2005, Nucleic Acids Res..

[69]  M. Little,et al.  Single-chain Antibodies for the Conformation-specific Blockade of Activated Platelet Integrin Α Iib Β 3 Designed by Subtractive Selection from Naïve Human Phage Libraries , 2022 .

[70]  B Tidor,et al.  Substantial energetic improvement with minimal structural perturbation in a high affinity mutant antibody. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[71]  Ana Cauerhff,et al.  Structural mechanism for affinity maturation of an anti-lysozyme antibody. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[72]  D. Baker,et al.  Design of a Novel Globular Protein Fold with Atomic-Level Accuracy , 2003, Science.

[73]  Jeffrey J. Gray,et al.  Protein-protein docking with simultaneous optimization of rigid-body displacement and side-chain conformations. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[74]  Peter G Schultz,et al.  Structural plasticity and the evolution of antibody affinity and specificity. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[75]  S. Wodak,et al.  Assessment of blind predictions of protein–protein interactions: Current status of docking methods , 2003, Proteins.

[76]  Adrian A Canutescu,et al.  Cyclic coordinate descent: A robotics algorithm for protein loop closure , 2003, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[77]  Masayuki Oda,et al.  Thermodynamic and kinetic aspects of antibody evolution during the immune response to hapten. , 2003, Molecular immunology.

[78]  D. Baker,et al.  A simple physical model for binding energy hot spots in protein–protein complexes , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[79]  J. Kirsch,et al.  How do two unrelated antibodies, HyHEL‐10 and F9.13.7, recognize the same epitope of hen egg‐white lysozyme? , 2002, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[80]  R. Wetzel,et al.  Conformational Abs recognizing a generic amyloid fibril epitope , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[81]  W. Delano The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System , 2002 .

[82]  L. Presta,et al.  The 1.85 A resolution crystal structures of tissue factor in complex with humanized Fab D3h44 and of free humanized Fab D3h44: revisiting the solvation of antigen combining sites. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[83]  R C Stevens,et al.  A comparative analysis of the immunological evolution of antibody 28B4. , 2001, Biochemistry.

[84]  B. Stoddard,et al.  Structure of a factor VIII C2 domain-immunoglobulin G4kappa Fab complex: identification of an inhibitory antibody epitope on the surface of factor VIII. , 2001, Blood.

[85]  K. Rao,et al.  Maturation of an antibody response is governed by modulations in flexibility of the antigen-combining site. , 2000, Immunity.

[86]  D. Baker,et al.  Native protein sequences are close to optimal for their structures. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[87]  M. Glennie,et al.  Clinical trials of antibody therapy. , 2000, Immunology today.

[88]  Haruki Nakamura,et al.  H3‐rules: identification of CDR‐H3 structures in antibodies , 1999, FEBS letters.

[89]  C. Chothia,et al.  The atomic structure of protein-protein recognition sites. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[90]  E. Getzoff,et al.  Structural basis for the binding of an anti-cytochrome c antibody to its antigen: crystal structures of FabE8-cytochrome c complex to 1.8 A resolution and FabE8 to 2.26 A resolution. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[91]  L. Prasad,et al.  The 2.5 A resolution structure of the jel42 Fab fragment/HPr complex. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[92]  A. Lesk,et al.  Standard conformations for the canonical structures of immunoglobulins. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[93]  Haruki Nakamura,et al.  Structural classification of CDR‐H3 in antibodies , 1996, FEBS letters.

[94]  E L Sonnhammer,et al.  The imprint of somatic hypermutation on the repertoire of human germline V genes. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[95]  H. Wolfson,et al.  Shape complementarity at protein–protein interfaces , 1994, Biopolymers.

[96]  Roland L. Dunbrack,et al.  Conformational analysis of the backbone-dependent rotamer preferences of protein sidechains , 1994, Nature Structural Biology.

[97]  T. Bhat,et al.  Bound water molecules and conformational stabilization help mediate an antigen-antibody association. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[98]  P Davies,et al.  Optimal humanization of 1B4, an anti-CD18 murine monoclonal antibody, is achieved by correct choice of human V-region framework sequences. , 1993, Journal of immunology.

[99]  G. Winter,et al.  Antibody framework residues affecting the conformation of the hypervariable loops. , 1992, Journal of molecular biology.

[100]  J Saldanha,et al.  Humanization of a mouse monoclonal antibody by CDR-grafting: the importance of framework residues on loop conformation. , 1991, Protein engineering.

[101]  E. Padlan,et al.  A possible procedure for reducing the immunogenicity of antibody variable domains while preserving their ligand-binding properties. , 1991, Molecular immunology.

[102]  César Milstein,et al.  Man-made antibodies , 1991, Nature.

[103]  E. Kabat,et al.  Sequences of proteins of immunological interest , 1991 .

[104]  A Tramontano,et al.  Framework residue 71 is a major determinant of the position and conformation of the second hypervariable region in the VH domains of immunoglobulins. , 1990, Journal of molecular biology.

[105]  A. Lesk,et al.  Conformations of immunoglobulin hypervariable regions , 1989, Nature.

[106]  Lutz Riechmann,et al.  Reshaping human antibodies for therapy , 1988, Nature.

[107]  A. Lesk,et al.  Canonical structures for the hypervariable regions of immunoglobulins. , 1987, Journal of molecular biology.

[108]  P. T. Jones,et al.  Replacing the complementarity-determining regions in a human antibody with those from a mouse , 1986, Nature.

[109]  A M Lesk,et al.  Evolution of proteins formed by beta-sheets. II. The core of the immunoglobulin domains. , 1982, Journal of molecular biology.

[110]  G J Williams,et al.  The Protein Data Bank: a computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. , 1978, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics.

[111]  H. Bilofsky,et al.  Unusual distributions of amino acids in complementarity-determining (hypervariable) segments of heavy and light chains of immunoglobulins and their possible roles in specificity of antibody-combining sites. , 1977, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[112]  E. Padlan,et al.  Structural basis for the specificity of antibody–antigen reactions and structural mechanisms for the diversification of antigen-binding specificities , 1977, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[113]  M. Wilchek,et al.  A homologous series of affinity labeling reagents and their use in the study of antibody binding sites. , 1971, Biochemistry.

[114]  T. T. Wu,et al.  AN ANALYSIS OF THE SEQUENCES OF THE VARIABLE REGIONS OF BENCE JONES PROTEINS AND MYELOMA LIGHT CHAINS AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS FOR ANTIBODY COMPLEMENTARITY , 1970, The Journal of experimental medicine.